Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The question of mathematical social theory revisited: Some methodological considerations

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methodologically, the most advanced social science discipline is considered economics, especially its neoclassical version. A number of practitioners in the other social sciences, especially sociology and political science, perceive economics as a scientific exemplar in methodological (and theoretical) terms. This methodological exemplar has been, particularly in the last decades, attempted to emulate by some of these social scientists. The outcome of this emulation, by adopting and extending its methods, of neoclassical economics in parts (but not all) of sociology, political science, and elsewhere has been rational choice theory as a general social paradigm. This paper tries to show that many misapplications of the methodology of neoclassical economics in rational choice theory have ensued from such methodological emulation. That neoclassical economics does not necessarily contain or lead to a mathematical rational choice model is the core argument of this paper. The paper fills in a gap created by the current literature’s focus on the methodological bases of mathematical rational choice theory in neoclassical economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, Peter. 1992. “Is Rational Choice Theory a Rational Choice of Theory?” Pp. 189–203 in James Coleman and Thomas Fararo (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “Putting Social Theory Right?” Sociological Theory 18: 518–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, Frank. 1997. “Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of Consumption.” Journal of Economic Issues 31:651–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, George. 2002. “Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior.” American Economic Review 92: 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allais, Maurice. 1997. “An Outline of My Main Contribution to Economic Science.” American Economic Review 87: S3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret and Jonathan Tritter. 2000. Rational Choice Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth. 1997. “Invaluable Goods.” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 757–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth and Gerard Debreu. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica 22: 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. L. 1993. Behavioral Foundations of Economies. London: St. Mattin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. Accounting For Tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary and Kevin Murphy. 2000. Social Economics. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. 2001. “No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists.“ Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond. 1981. The Logic of Social Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “Limitations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 817–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Mathieu. 1997. “Mirowski’s Thesis and the ’Integrability Problem.’” Journal of Economic Issues 31: 741–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James. 1989. “Rationality and Society.” Rationality and Society 1: 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Economic Sociology.” Pp. 3–26 in Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, John. 1996. “Why Bounded Rationality?” Journal of Economic Literature 34: 669–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, Gerard. 1969. “Valuation Equilibrium and Pareto Optimum.” Pp. 39–45 in Kenneth Arrow and Tibor Scitovsky (Eds.), Readings in Welfare Economics. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Haan, Wouter, Garey Ramey, and Joel Watson. 2000. “Job Destruction and Propagation of Shocks. “ American Economic Review 90: 482–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, John. 1993. “Philosophical Foundations of Social Economics: Marx, Schumpeter, and Keynes.” Pp. 32–44 in Edward Boyle (Ed.), Social Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1999. Essays in Socio-Economics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas. 1993. “General Social Equilibrium: Toward Theoretical Synthesis.” Sociological Theory 11: 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Social Action Systems. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert. 1996. “The Political Economy of Preference Falsification.” Journal of Economic Literature 34: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, Wade. 2001. Reflection Without Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael and Satoshi Kanazawa. 1997. “Sociological Rational Choice Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1998. “The Approach of Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36: 166–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, Edgar and Michael Hechter. 1998. “The Debate on Historical Sociology Rational Choice Theory and Its Critics.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 758–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, Siegwart. 1992. “The Method of Decreasing Abstraction.” Pp. 3–20 in James Coleman and Thomas Fararo (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, Michael and Andreas Flache. 1995. “Beyond Rationality in Models of Choice.” Annual Review Of Sociology 21: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, Louis and Joseph Ostroy. 2001. “Perfect Competition and the Creativity of the Market.” Journal of Economic Literature 39: 479–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Howard. 1982. Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald. 1994. “Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. The Vices of Economists-The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat Than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, James. 1994. “Weak Ties, Employment, and Inequality: An Equilibrium Analysis.” American Journal of ’Sociology 99: 1212–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1989. The Rationality of Political Protest. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirker, Reinhard and Hermann Rauchenschwandnter. 1998. “Sense of Community-A Fundamental Concept of Institutional Economics.” Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics 154: 406–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George. 1990. “The Current Status of Sociological Theory: The New Synthesis.” Pp. 3–38 in George Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander. 1996. Economics-Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns’. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul. 1983. Foundations Of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciulli, David. 1992. “Weaknesses in Rational Choice Theory’s Contribution to Comparative Research.” Pp. 164–188 in James Coleman and Thomas Fararo (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert. 1957. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil. 1992. “The Rational Choice Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Rationality and Society 4: 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert. 1990. Economics and Sociology. Pp. 275–282 in Richard Swedberg (Ed.), Economics and Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, Ron. 1999. “The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 33: 230–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002 “Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics.” American Economic Review 92: 460–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, Richard. 1991. Schumpeter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 1981. “Where Do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 87: 517–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilier, David. 1992. “The Principle of Rational Choice and the Problem of a Satisfactory Theory.” Pp 49–77 in James Coleman And Thomas Fararo (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, Leland. 1990. “Buchanan on Scope and Method.” Constitutional Political Economy 1: 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neodassicism, and the Market Test.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology at the University of North Texas, USA

    Milan Zafirovski (professor)

Authors
  1. Milan Zafirovski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zafirovski, M. The question of mathematical social theory revisited: Some methodological considerations. Am Soc 34, 59–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-003-1016-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-003-1016-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation