Skip to main content
Log in

Worlds come apart: Systems theory versus critical theory. Drama in the history of sociology in the twentieth century

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article places an episode in the history of sociological theory into intellectual history in the twentieth century. The perspective is chronological as well as contextual. The themes are two theoretical approaches, both embedded in both American and German history, Parsonian Systems Theory and “Frankfurt School” Critical Theory. The chronology shown spanned mainly from the 1940s to the 1960s. The context of the two theories is a period that is crucial in twentieth century history. The protagonists of the two approaches were, in the 1940s, Americans and Germans exiled in the United States. In the 1950s, both approaches were affected by McCarthyism in different ways. The 1960s, however, were the culmination. The dynamics of the two approaches led into a schism which came into the open on the occasion of the 1964 German Sociology Conference in Heidelberg celebrating Max Weber. The article shows the stages in the evolution of the schism, emulating three acts in a drama. The final split was over whether Weber or Marx should be the classic whose oeuvre was to influence sociological thinking today. My aim is to exemplify how these two authoritative approaches in sociological theory, far from escaping the vagaries and vicissitudes of their times, were embedded in twentieth-century history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, Nathan W., and Marie Jahoda. 1950. Anti-Semitism and Emotional Disorder: A Psycho-analytic Interpretation. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1946. “Anti-Semitism and Fascist Propaganda.” In: Ernst Simmel (ed.), Anti-Semitism—a Social Disease. New York: International Universities Press, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Berlin and Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1952a. “Zur gegenwärtigen Situation der empirischen Sozialforschung in Deutschland.” In: Empirische Sozialforschung: Meinungsund Marktforschung Methoden und Probleme. Frankfurt am Main: Institut zur Förderung öffentlicher Angelegenheiten e.V., 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1952b. “Die revidierte Psychoanalyse,” reprinted: Adorno, Gesammelte Schriften (editor, Rolf Tiedemann), vol. 8, Soziologische Schriften I, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1972, 20-41.

  • —1955a. Prismen: Kulturkritik und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955b. “Zum Verhältnis von Soziologie und Psychologie.” In: Sociologica: Aufsätze Max Horkheimer zum Sechzigsten Geburtstag gewidmet. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt 1955, 11–45; translated: “Sociology and Psychology,” New Left Review, vol. 46, 1967, 63-80, and vol. 47, 1968, 79-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1957. “Soziologie und empirische Sozialforschung.” In: Klaus Ziegler, Wesen und Wirklichkeit des Menschen: Festschrift für Helmuth Plessner. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 245–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1962. “Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 14, 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. “Rede beim offiziellen Empfang im Heidelberger Schloss,” in: Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute. Tübingen: Mohr, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1967. “Vorrede,” in: Joachim Bergmann, Die Theorie des sozialen Systems von Talcott Parsons, Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. “Einleitung,” in: Adorno et al., Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 7–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford (in collaboration with Betty Aron, Maria Hertz Levinson, and William Morrow). 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Ralf Dahrendorf, Harald Pilot, Hans Albert, Jürgen Habermas, and Karl Popper. 1969. Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, Clemens, Günter C. Behrmann, Michael Bock, Harald Homann, and Friedrich Tenbruck. Die intellektuelle Gründung der Bundesrepublik: Eine Wirkungsgeschichte der Frankfurter Schule. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

  • Alexander, Jeffrey. 1983. The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, vol. 4, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard. 1960. Max Weber—An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard 1965. “Diskussionsbeitrag,” in: Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute, 184-191.

  • Bendix, Reinhard 1971. “Two Sociological Traditions,” in: Bendix and Guenther Roth, Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press, 282–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Joachim. 1967. Die Theorie des sozialen Systems von Talcott Parsons. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, vol. 20. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, Bruno, and Morris Janowitz. 1950. Dynamics of Prejudice: A Psychoanalytic and Sociological Study of Veterans. New York: Harper and Brothers (reissued: New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierstedt, Robert. 1981. American Sociological Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, Charles (ed.). 1991. Talcott Parsons. The Early Essays. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Carl. 1964. “The Storm Over Weber,” Encounter, vol. 23, No. 8, 57–59 (Aug., 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Richard, and Marie Jahoda (eds.). 1954. Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritarian Personality. “ Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Jean M. 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1958. “Out of Utopia,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 64, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile. 1893. De la division du travail social. Étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. Translated by George Simpson: The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Macmillan 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1946. “The Anti-Semitic Personality. A Research Report.” In: Ernst Simmel (ed), Anti-Semitism—a Social Disease. New York: International Universities Press, 96–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, Uta. 1993a (ed.), Talcott Parsons on National Socialism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1993b. “Talcott Parsons’s Sociology of National Socialism.” In: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 1-77.

  • — 1996. “Scholarship, Not Scandal.” Sociological Forum, vol. 11, 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —1999. “National Socialism and the Politics of The Structure of Social Action.” In: Bernard Barber and Gerhardt (eds.), Agenda for Sociology. Classic Sources and Current Uses of Talcott Parsons’s Work. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 87–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 2001. Idealtypus: Zur methodologischen Begründung der modernen Soziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp

  • —. 2002. Talcott Parsons—An Intellectual Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen, 1965. “Diskussionsbeitrag,” in Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute. Tübingen: Mohr, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Ludwig von Friedeburg, Egon Becker, and Christoph Oehler. 1961. Student und Politik. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heinz. 1939. Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950a. “Technical Implications of Ego Psychology.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 20, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950b. “The Application of Psychoanalytic Concepts to Social Science,” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 19, 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and Ernst Kris. 1946. “Comments on the Formation of the Psychic Structure,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, vol. 2, 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, Roscoe C. 1994. Developments on American Sociological Theory, 1915–1950. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Gisela J. Hinkle. 1954. The Development of Modern Sociology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max. 1937. “Traditionelle und kritische Theorie.” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 6, 245–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. “Die Juden und Europa.” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 8, 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1946. “Sociological Background of the Psychoanalytic Approach.” In: Ernst Simmel (ed.), Anti-Semitism—a Social Disease. New York: International Universities Press, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1959. “Philosophie und Soziologie,” in: Verhandlungen des Vierzehnten Deutschen Soziologentages in Berlin, Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1965. “Einleitung zur Diskussion,” zu “Diskussion zum Thema: Wertfreiheit und Objektivität,” in: Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute. Verhandlungen des 15. Deutschen Soziologentages. Tübingen: Mohr, 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse et al., 1936. Studien über Autorität und Familie. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and Theodor W. Adorno. 1947. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. Soziologische Exkurse. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt; translated: Aspects of Sociology, by The Frankfurt Institute for Social Reseach, London: Heinemann 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Aldous. 1932. Brave New World. A Novel. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, Marie. 1954. “Introduction,” in: Richard Christie and Jahoda (eds.), Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritarian Personality, “ 11-23.

  • Jay, Martin. 1973. The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaesler, Dirk (ed.). 1999. Klassiker der soziologischen Theorie. Munich: Hanser (2 vols.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Daniel, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1944. “A Scale for the Measurement of Anti-Semitism.” Journal of Psychology, vol. 7, 339–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, Leo, and Norbert Guterman. 1950. Prophets of Deceit: A Study of the Technique of the American Agitator. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. 1950. Freedom, Power, and Democratic Planning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1965a. “Industrialisierung und Kapitalismus,” in: Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute, 161-180.

  • -. 1965b. “Schlusswort,” in Otto Stammer (ed.), 216-218.

  • Maslow, A.H. 1943. “The Authoritarian Character Structure,” Journal of Social Psychology, S.P.S.S.I. Bulletin, vol. 18, 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massing, Paul W. 1950. Rehearsal for Destruction: A Study of Political Anti-Semitism in Imperial Germany. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action,” American Sociological Review, vol. 1, 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1949. “Manifest and Latent Function,” in: Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press 1957 (2nd edition), 19–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1959. Max Weber und die deutsche Politik 1890–1920. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 2nd revised edition, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Benjamin 1965. “Diskussionsbeitrag,” in: Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute, 192-201.

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory With Special Reference to a Group of Four Recent European Writers. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1942a. “Max Weber and the Contemporary Political Crisis.” Review of Politics, vol. 4. Reprinted in: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter 1993, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1942b. “Some Sociological Aspects of the Fascist Movements,” Social Forces, vol. 17. Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1942c. “Propaganda and Social Control.” Psychiatry, vol. 5. Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1942d. “The Sociology of Modern Anti-Semitism.” In Isaac Graeber and Stuart Britt Henderson (eds.), Jews in a Gentile World. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1945a. “The Problem of Controlled Institutional Change. An Essay in Applied Social Science.” Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, {pp291-324}.

  • —1945b. “Racial and Religious Differences as Factors in Group Tensions.” In: Lyman Bryson, Louis Finckelstein, and Robert McIver (eds), Approaches to Unity. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 275-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1947. “Certain Primary Sources and Patterns of Aggression in the Social Structure of the Western World.” Psychiatry, vol. 10. Reprinted: Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “Psychoanalysis and Social Structure.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 19, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1952. “The Superego and the Theory of Social Systems,” Psychiatry, vol. 15, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1953. “Psychoanalysis and Social Science with Special Reference to the Oedipus Problem,” in: Franz Alexander and Helen Ross (eds.), Twenty Years of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton, 186–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1954. “The Father Symbol: An Appraisal in the Light of Psychoanalytic and Sociological Theory.” In: Lyman Bryson, Louis Finkelstein, and Robert McIver (eds.), Symbols and Values. Thirteenth Symposium of the Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion. New York: Harper and Row, 523–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1957. “The Distribution of Power in American Social Structure,” World Politics, vol. 10, 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1959. “Some Problems Confronting Sociology as a Profession.” American Sociological Review, vol. 24, 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott 1963 “On the Concept of Political Power.” Reprinted: Parsons, Politics and Social Structure. New York: Free Press 1969, 352-404.

  • - Parsons, Talcott 1965a. “Wertfreiheit und Objektivität.” In: Otto Stammer ed., Max Weber und die Soziologie heute, 39-64.

  • — 1965b. “Evaluation and Objectivity,” in: Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Society, New York: Free Press 1967, 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965c. “Max Weber, 1864-1964,” American Sociological Review, vol. 30, 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1965d. “Unity and Diversity in the Modern Intellectual Disciplines: The Role of the Social Sciences,” Daedalus, vol. 94, 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1967. “Some Comments on the Sociology of Karl Marx,” in: Sociological Theory and Modem Society, 102-135.

  • — 1980. “The Circumstances of My Encounter with Max Weber.” In Robert K. Merton and Matilda White Riley (eds.), Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation, Glimpses of the American Experience. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Edward Shils (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and Renée Fox. 1952. “Illness, Therapy, and the Modern Urban Family,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 8, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Edward A. Shils, and Robert F. Bales. 1953. Working Papers in the Theory of Action ncoe IL Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and Robert F. Bales. 1955. Family Socialization and Interaction Process London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, Fritz. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins. The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Reprinted: Hanover and London: University Press of New England 1990.

  • Sanford, R. Nevitt and Else Frenkel-Brunswik. 1945. “Some Personality Factors in Anti-Semitism,” Journal of Psychology, vol. 20, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward A. 1954. “Authoritarianism—‘Right’ or ‘Left’?” In Richard Christie and Marie Jahoda (eds.), Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritarian Personality,” 24-49.

  • Simmel, Ernst (ed.). 1946. Anti-Semitism—a Social Disease. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Piritim. 1928. Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stammer, Otto (ed). 1965. Max Weber und die Soziologie heute. Verhandlungen des Fünfzehnten Deutschen Soziologentages 1964 in Heidelberg. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1904. “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.” In: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 3rd edition. Tübingen: Mohr 1968, 146–214; translated as: “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy,” in The Methodology of the Social Sciences: Max Weber, translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, New York: The Free Press 1949, 50-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der Sozialökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr; translated by Guenter Roth and Claus Wittich: Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggershaus, Rolf. 1986. Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte, Theoretische Entwicklung, Politische Bedeutung. München: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willkie, Wendell. 1943. One World. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerhardt, U. Worlds come apart: Systems theory versus critical theory. Drama in the history of sociology in the twentieth century. Am Soc 33, 5–39 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1001-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1001-7

Keywords

Navigation