Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiographic Imaging of Human Papillomavirus Related Carcinomas of the Oropharynx

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
Head and Neck Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging, especially contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for anatomy and positron emission tomography (PET) with labeled 18F fluorodeoxyglucose for physiologic detail, is critical for staging carcinomas of the oropharynx. As the incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and related carcinomas of the tonsil and base of tongue (BOT) increases, experience with CECT and PET for staging HPV+ tumors is growing. No imaging modality, however, can determine whether the tumor is HPV+. There are some unique challenges posed by HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In most locations of the head and neck, a malignancy enhances more than surrounding normal structures, which facilitates tumor mapping. Unfortunately, normal lymphoid tissue of the oropharynx, in the BOT and palatine tonsillar fossa, enhances on CECT and gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a manner similar to SCC. The primary tumor may be small or even occult at presentation, and easily over-looked on CECT. PET coupled with CECT has made a true “unknown primary” very rare, as the metabolically active tumor is almost always detectable on PET. The nodal metastases, so common with HPV+ SCC, can be truly cystic; and as such, can be misdiagnosed as a second branchial cleft cyst, a congenital benign lesion. These pitfalls, coupled with the complex anatomy of the upper aerodigestive tract, make staging these tumors difficult. In this monograph we describe the anatomy of the oropharynx and review the imaging modalities available for staging. Figures highlight the points raised in the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osborne RG, Brown JJ. Carcinoma of the oral pharynx: an analysis of subsite treatment heterogeneity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2004;13:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Filion E, Le Q-T. Oropharynx: epidemiology and treatment outcome. In: Harari PM, Connor NP, Grau C, editors. Functional preservation and quality of life in head and neck radiotherapy. Berlin: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simard EP, Ward EM, Siegel R, Jemal A. Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999–2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 (epub ahead of print). doi:10.3322/caac.20141.

  4. Saba NF, Goodman M, Ward K, et al. Gender and ethnic disparities in incidence and survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue, base of tongue and tonsils: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results program-based analysis. Oncology. 2011;81:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Souza F, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, et al. Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1944–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaturverdi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin DT, Cohen SM, Coppit GL, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Otolaryngol Clinc N Am. 2005;38:59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Trotta BM, Pease CS, Rasamny JJ, et al. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: key imaging findings for staging and treatment planning. Radiographics. 2011;31:339–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohan DM, Popat S, Kaplan SE, et al. Oropharyngeal cancer: current understanding and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stambuk HE, Karimi S, Lee N, et al. Oral cavity and oropharynx tumors. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wesolowski JR, Mukherji S. Pathology of the pharynx. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and neck imaging. 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, et al. AJCC7 cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Syms MJ, Birkmire-Peters DP, Holtel MR. Incidence of carcinoma in incidental tonsil asymmetry. Laryngoscope. 2000;11:1807–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon DY, Hwang HS, Chang SK, et al. CT, MR, US, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:634–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu G-Z, Zhu X-D, Li M-Y. Accuracy of whole-body PET and PET-CT in initial M staging of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2011;33:87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bannas P, Habermann CR, Jung C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of state-of-the-art MDCT scanners without gantry tilt in patient with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2011;. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bhargava P, Rahman S, Wendt J. Atlas of confounding factors in head and neck PET/CT imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:e20–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blodgett TM, Fukui MB, Snyderman CH, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck. Part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic and artifactual FDG uptake. Radiographics. 2005;25:897–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmalbach CE, Miller FR. Occult primary head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2007;9:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong WL, Sonoda LI, Gharpurhy, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of occult primary head and neck cancers—an audit and review of published studies. Clin Oncol. Available on-line 17 Dec 2011.

  21. Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, et al. Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Westra WH. The changing face of head and neck cancer in the 21st century: the impact of HPV on the epidemiology and pathology of oral cancer. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:78–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldenberg D, Begu S, Westra WH, et al. Cystic lymph node metastatsis in patients with head and neck cancer: an HPV-associated phenomenon. Head Neck. 2008;30(7):898–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morani A, Shah G, Eisbruch A, et al. Intranodal cystic changes: a potential radiological signature/biomarker to assess the human papilloma virus status of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. AJR 2011;196:A47. Abstract presented in scientific session 14—neuroradiology: head and neck on 4 May 2011 at the ARRS meeting.

  25. Hudgins PA, Gillison M. Editorial: second branchial cleft cyst: NOT!! AJNR. 2009;30:1628–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahuga AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR. 2005;184:1691–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. King KG, Kositwattanarerk A, Genden E, et al. Cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx: FDG-PET with contrast enhanced CT in the posttreatment setting. Radiographics. 2011;31:355–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda S. Corey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corey, A.S., Hudgins, P.A. Radiographic Imaging of Human Papillomavirus Related Carcinomas of the Oropharynx. Head and Neck Pathol 6 (Suppl 1), 25–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-012-0374-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-012-0374-3

Keywords

Navigation