Skip to main content
Log in

Sometimes they Come Back: Recidivism and the Adult Imprisonment of Formerly Incarcerated Serious And Violent Juvenile Offenders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the adult imprisonment outcomes of a cohort of serious and violent juvenile offenders released from Texas state juvenile correctional facilities during their transition from adolescence to early adulthood. We distinguish incarceration in the adult prison system as resulting from a new offense or as the result of a revocation for a technical supervision violation. Of the sample (n = 709), 37% were incarcerated in Texas’ adult prison system within two years following their release from state juvenile incarceration—16% were incarcerated for a new offense and 21% were incarcerated for revocation as a result of a technical violation of supervision. Results indicate that race, being a sexual offender, gang affiliate, engaging in violent institutional misconduct as a juvenile ward, being under supervised release, and age at initial juvenile incarceration were determinants of adult incarceration for any reason. Similar determinants of incarceration were found examining incarceration for offenders released under community supervision. Prior placements as a juvenile and gang affiliation were correlated with incarceration for a new offense. Research and policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It should be noted that in the Boulger and Olson (2011) article, age at release from juvenile authorities was a consideration in that some offenders who recidivated and were re-incarcerated could be eligible for re-incarceration in a juvenile and/or an adult facility, depending on their age. In this study, we examine only incarceration in the state’s adult prison setting.

  2. The sample started with 782 subjects, but several limitations reduced the analytic sample from 782 to 709. The decision to drop cases were based on the following: Nine observations lacked enough information to develop variables of interest, two subjects were released from juvenile custody as decedents, five observations included data entry error on at least one variable of interest, and 57 offenders were excluded from the final analytical sample because they did not have at least two years of follow-up.

  3. Caudill & Trulson (2023) note the potential confounding consequences of using short recidivism exposure windows, thus, we incorporated a recidivism exposure period of two years.

  4. Due to the small number of sub-sample observations, a number of other violent offenses and other offenses were collapsed into a single variable, “other offenses,” in the regression models.

  5. Information used to create the violent misconduct rate variable was missing in 42 observations. The mean average of the observed violent misconduct rate for the other 724 subjects was 0.644 (sd = 3.807). This mean average was imputed for the missing 42 observations, resulting in the full sample mean of 0.645 (sd = 3.701). Subsequent analyses comparing the results of logistic regression models predicting TDCJ with imputation and listwise deletion samples suggest non-significant (absolute z-scores < 0.73) changes in coefficients and no shifts in direction or significance. Based on these results, the mean average was imputed for missing violent misconduct rates to maintain the sample of 709.

  6. Model fit: Obs = 709; X2 = 119.78**; McFadden R2 = 0.13; VIF: 1.19.

  7. Model fit: Obs = 709; X2 = 42.41**; McFadden R2 = 0.07; VIF: 1.19.

  8. Model fit: Obs = 517; X2 = 57.84**; McFadden R2 = 0.08; VIF: 1.17.

  9. Model fit: Obs = 229; X2 = 42.34**; McFadden R2 = 0.14; VIF: 1.28.

References

  • Aizer, A., & Doyle Jr, J. J. (2011). Juvenile incarceration and adult outcomes: Evidence from randomly-assigned judges. Unpublished Working Paper. Retrieved from (December 4, 2023): https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/workshop/leo/document/J.Doyle.swingjudges_03032011.pdf

  • Augustyn, M. B., & McGloin, J. M. (2018). Revisiting juvenile waiver: Integrating the incapacitation experience. Criminology, 56(1), 154–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., Epps, N., Swartz, K., Huq, M. S., Sheer, A., & Hardt, N. S. (2014a). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., Jackowski, K., Greenwald, M., & Howell, J. (2014b). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. A statewide analysis of prevalence and prediction of subsequent recidivism using risk and protective factors. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., Wolff, K. T., Piquero, A. R., & Epps, N. (2015). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and juvenile offending trajectories in a juvenile offender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda, B., Corwyn, R., & Toombs, N. (2001). Recidivism among adolescent serious offenders: Prediction of entry into the correctional system for adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 588–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Farrington, D. P., & Moitra, S. (1985). Delinquency careers: Innocents, desisters, and persisters. Crime and Justice, 6, 187–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, T., DeLisi, M., Jones-Johnson, G., Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. (2020). Chaotic homes, adverse childhood experiences, and serious delinquency: Differential effects by race and ethnicity. Justice Quarterly, 37(4), 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulger, J. K., & Olson, D. E. (2011). Distinguishing between return to juvenile versus adult prison in juvenile recidivism analyses. Justice Research and Policy, 13(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brame, R., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C., & Piquero, A. R. (2018). Recidivism in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. H., Caudill, J. W., Craig, J. M., DeLisi, M., & Trulson, C. R. (2021). 99 percenters: An examination of the misconduct careers of the most violent and disruptive incarcerated delinquents. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 60(September-October), 101520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Langan, N. P., & Saylor, W. G. (2003). The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 501–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, J. W. (2010). Back on the swagger: Institutional release and recidivism timing among gang affiliates. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 8(1), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. R. (2016). The hazards of premature release: Recidivism outcomes of blended-sentenced juvenile homicide offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. R. (2023). Comparing official measures of recidivism in juvenile justice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(2), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, J. W., Morris, R. G., El Sayed, S., Yun, M., & DeLisi, M. (2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. C., Mears, D. P., Bales, W. D., & Stewart, E. A. (2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, C., Lee, R., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. M., Trulson, C. R., DeLisi, M., & Caudill, J. W. (2020). Toward an understanding of the impact of adverse childhood experiences on the recidivism of serious juvenile offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. W., Brame, R., & Piquero, A. R. (1996). Criminal propensities, discrete groups of offenders, and persistence in crime. Criminology, 34, 547–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi, M., Hochstetler, A., Jones-Johnson, G., Caudill, J. W., & Marquart, J. (2011). The road to murder: The enduring criminogenic effects of juvenile confinement among a sample of adult career criminals. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 207–2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, B. D., Seals, A., & Skarbek, D. (2014). The effect of prison gang membership on recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, A. J., DeLisi, M., & Elbert, M. J. (2020). What becomes of chronic juvenile delinquents? Multifinality at midlife. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(2), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, M. E., & Cohen, L. E. (2005). Desisting from crime: Continuity and change in long-term crime patterns of serious chronic offenders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, C. (2013). The youth discount: Old enough to do the crime, too young to do the time. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 107.

  • Grisso, T., Barnum, R., Fletcher, K. E., Cauffman, E., & Peuschold, D. (2001). Massachusetts youth screening instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(5), 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haerle, D. (2014). Dosage matters: Impact of a violent offender treatment program on juvenile recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., Widdowson, A., Bates, M., Baglivio, M. T., Jackowski, K., & Greenwald, M. A. (2018). Predicting recidivism among released juvenile offenders in Florida: An evaluation of the residential positive achievement change tool. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 16(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K., Brock, W., Waite, D., Lanier, A., Schmid, M., Witte, G., Keeney, M., Westendorf, M., Buinavert, L., & Schumate, M. (2000). Risk factors for juvenile criminal recidivism: The postrelease community adjustment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. C., Krisberg, B., Hawkins, J. D., & Wilson, J. J. (1995). A sourcebook: Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Woolard, J. (2011). Disregarding graduated treatment: Why transfer aggravates recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 57(5), 756–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. L. (2012). Juvenile transfer and recidivism: A propensity score matching approach. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf-Leonard, K., Tracy, P. E., & Howell, J. C. (2001). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: The relationship of delinquency career types to adult criminality. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 449–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, T. D., Edmonds, W. A., Millen, D. H., & Detullio, D. (2019). Chronic juvenile offenders: Exploring risk factor models of recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(2), 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza-Kaduce, L., Lane, J., Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (2005). Juvenile offenders and adult felony recidivism: The impact of transfer. Journal of Crime & Justice, 28(1), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, P., MacDonald, J., Piquero, A., Linster, R., & Visher, C. (2004). Studying the characteristics of arrest frequency among paroled youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., & Eikenberry, J. (2021). Recidivism by conviction offense type and release status among prisoners released in Iowa. Crime & Delinquency, 67(3), 344–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & Van Marle, H. (2011). Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. P. (2011). Highlights from Pathways to Desistance: A longitudinal study of serious adolescent offenders. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs.

  • Parker, J., Morton, T., Lingefelt, M., & Johnson, K. (2005). Predictors of serious and violent offender recidivism by adjudicated male adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 30, 359–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., Farrington, D., Jennings, W., Diamond, B., & Craig, J. (2012). Sex offenders and sex offending in the Cambridge study in delinquent development: Prevalence, frequency, specialization, recidivism, and (dis)continuity over the life-course. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., Abrams, L., & Huang, H. (2014). First-time violent juvenile offenders: Probation, placement, and recidivism. Social Work Research, 38, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemaker, A., Bonner, T., DeLisi, M., Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. R. (2021). Ungovernable, incorrigible, and impudent: An empirical study of criminal character among serious institutionalized delinquents. American Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09639-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoolmiller, M., & Blechman, E. A. (2005). Substance use is a robust predictor of adolescent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(3), 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., & Caudill, J. (2017). Juvenile homicide offender recidivism. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 7(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C., Marquart, J., Mullings, J., & Caeti, T. (2005). In between adolescence and adulthood: Recidivism outcomes of a cohort of state delinquents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 314–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C., DeLisi, M., Caudill, J., Belshaw, S., & Marquart, J. (2010). Delinquent careers behind bars. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 200–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., Caudill, J. W., Belshaw, S. H., & DeLisi, M. (2011a). A problem of fit: Extreme delinquents, blended sentencing, and the determinants of continued adult sanctions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(3), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., DeLisi, M., & Marquart, J. W. (2011b). Institutional misconduct, delinquent background, and re-arrest frequency among serious and violent delinquent offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 57(5), 709–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., Haerle, D. R., DeLisi, M., & Marquart, J. W. (2011c). Blended sentencing, early release, and recidivism of violent institutionalized delinquents. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., Caudill, J. W., Haerle, D. R., & DeLisi, M. (2012). Cliqued up: The postincarceration recidivism of young gang-related homicide offenders. Criminal Justice Review, 37(2), 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., Haerle, D. R., Caudill, J. W., & DeLisi, M. (2016). Lost causes: Blended sentencing, second chances, and the Texas youth commission. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trulson, C. R., Craig, J. M., Caudill, J. W., & DeLisi, M. (2020). The impact of adult prison transfer on the recidivism outcomes of blended-sentenced juvenile delinquents. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 887–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, S., Oudekerk, B., Reppucci, N., & Woolard, J. (2013). Examining the link between perceptions of relationship quality with parole officers and recidivism among female youth parolees. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13, 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. A., Lattimore, P. M., & Linster, R. L. (1991). Predicting recidivism of serious youthful offenders using survival models. Criminology, 29, 329–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquent in a birth cohort. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chad R. Trulson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trulson, C.R., Craig, J.M., Caudill, J.W. et al. Sometimes they Come Back: Recidivism and the Adult Imprisonment of Formerly Incarcerated Serious And Violent Juvenile Offenders. Am J Crim Just 49, 349–369 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09755-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09755-x

Keywords

Navigation