Skip to main content

From Causal Mechanisms to Policy Mechanisms: Why Did Crime Decline and What Lessons Can Be Learned from It?

American Journal of Criminal Justice volume 47, pages 1116–1139 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Criminology has not systematically identified the cause or causes of perhaps the most seminal event in crime and justice of the last half century: the crime decline of the 1990s. This paper uses a causes-of-effects analysis to infer the mechanisms of the crime decline. This is not a purely academic exercise—there has been a large increase in violence, particularly gun violence at the beginning of the 2020s. Identifying the mechanisms of the last crime decline can inform the development of contemporary strategies. Here, two classes of crime decline causes are proposed: mechanisms that are endogenous to the criminal law system and mechanisms that are exogenous to it. The latter class includes impacts of changes in macroeconomics, consumer behavior, and public interest policy where positive externalities that arose from those factors contributed to the crime decline. A descriptive effect of causes analysis suggests that these exogenous mechanisms contributed disproportionately to the crime decline as compared to endogenous mechanisms. Further, consumer behavior and public interest externalities are well aligned with potential policy levers and particularly salient to current and future efforts to reduce crime and violence prospectively. The analysis suggests that efforts to improve public safety require policies that fall outside of traditional criminal justice approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. Author’s calculations, using data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation Crime Data Explorer, accessed October 27, 2022: https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend.

  2. Note: the distinction between legislative policy and fiscal policy (by the legislature) is somewhat arbitrary. Fiscal policy is understood here to include legislation intended to affect macroeconomic outcomes, such as GDP or inequality. Legislative policy is understood here to have other objectives, such as achieving public health outcomes. In practice, changes in tax structures are often used to achieve both objectives.

References

  • Austin, J. & Fabelo, T. (2004). The diminishing returns of increased incarceration. A Blueprint to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Costs. The JFA Institute.

  • Ayres, I., & Levitt, S. D. (1998). Measuring positive externalities from unobservable victim precaution: An empirical analysis of Lojack. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 43–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. (2010). Explaining the Great American Crime Decline: A Review of Blumstein and Wallman, Goldberger and Rosenfeld, and Zimring. Law and Social Inquiry, 35(2), 489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., Vélez, M. B., & Rosenfeld, R. (2018). Bringing crime trends back into criminology: A critical assessment of the literature and a blueprint for future inquiry. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhati, A. S., Roman, J. K., & Chalfin, A. (2008). To treat or not to treat: Evidence on the prospects of expanding treatment to drug-involved offenders. The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhati, A. S., & Roman, J. K. (2010). Simulated evidence on the prospects of treating more drug-involved offenders. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Joel Wallman, J. (Eds.). (2006). The Crime Drop in America (Revised). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1998). US criminal justice conundrum: Rising prison populations and stable crime rates. Crime & Delinquency, 44(1), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canela-Cacho, J. A., Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1997). Relationship between the Offending Frequency of Imprisoned and Free Offenders. Criminology, 35, 133–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, J. (2012). Crime reducing entertainment: The contribution of media entertainment and communication technologies to the UK’s victimisation drop. Internet Journal of Criminology.

  • Clear, T. R. (2009). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cork, D. (1999). Examining Space-Time Interaction in City-Level Homicide Data: Crack Markets and the Diffusion of Guns Among Youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology., 15(4), 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., & Levitt, S. D. (1999). Crime, Urban Flight, and the Consequences for Cities. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, R. (1998). The Important Transformation of Inner-city Neighborhoods: Crime, Violence, Drugs and Youth in the 1990s. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(4), 1233–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A. P., & Musio, M. (2022). Effects of causes and causes of effects. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9, 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J. J., & Siegelman, P. (1998). Allocating resources among prisons and social programs in the battle against crime. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(1), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J. J., & Levitt, S. D. (2001). The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 379–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Maguire, E. R. (2000). Have Changes in Policing Reduce Violent Crime? An Assessment of the Evidence. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The Crime Drop in America (pp. 207–265). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. (1996). Crime, punishment, and the market for offenses. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., Tilley, N., & Tseloni, A. (2014). Why the Crime Drop. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 43(January), 421–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., Rueda, S. M. A. M., Cruz, D. E., Ferguson, S. F., & Smith, S. M. (2008). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A. (2000). Demographics and US homicide. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The Crime Drop in America (pp. 288–317). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding Crime Trends: Workshop Report. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., & Kearley, B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E. D., Weinberg, B. A., & Mustard, D. B. (2002). Crime Rates and Local Labor Market Opportunities in the United States, 1979–1997. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J., & Willis, M. (2000). The Emergence of Crack Cocaine and the Rise in Urban Crime Rates. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as specification error. Econometrica, 45, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H. J., Schanzenbach, D. W., Duncan, G. J., & Ludwig, J. (2008). The Economic Costs of Childhood Poverty in the United States. Journal of Children and Poverty, 14(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. B. (2009). Broken Lives from Broken Windows: The Hidden Costs of Aggressive Order-Maintenance Policing. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 33, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. D., Golub, A., & Dunlap, E. (2006). The Rise and Decline of Hard Drugs, Drug Markets, and Violence in Inner-city New York. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The Crime Drop in America (pp. 164–206). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. (2021a). Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 1974–2020. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. (2021b). Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 1960–2020. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1996). The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 319–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1999). The Exaggerated Role of Changing Age Structure in Explaining Aggregate Crime Changes. Criminology, 37, 537–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors That Explain the Decline and Six That Do Not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M.W., Wilson, D.B, Cohen, M.A. & Derzon, J.H. (2002). Is there a causal relationship between alcohol use and violence? Recent developments in alcoholism. 245–282.

  • Lurigio, A. J. (2008). The first 20 years of drug treatment courts: A brief description of their history and impact. Federal Probation, 72, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., & Sampson, R. J. (2012). The world in a city: Immigration and America’s changing social fabric. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte, D. E., & Markowitz, S. (2011). A cure for crime? Psycho-pharmaceuticals and crime trends. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. E. (1994). Prison population growth and crime reduction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(2), 109–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massenkoff, M. N., & Rose, E. K. (2022). Family formation and crime, w30385. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2016). Realist criminology, the new aetiological crisis and the crime drop. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(3), 2.

  • Mears, D. P. (2001). Immigration and crime: What’s the connection? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. M., Berzofsky, M., & Banks, D. (2019). National Crime Victimization Survey Historical Trends Project, 1973–2014 (NCJ 250655). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S. (2022). Unraveling mass incarceration: Criminology’s role in the policy process. Criminology, 60, 401–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, R. (2000). How lead exposure relates to temporal changes in IQ, violent crime, and unwed pregnancy. Environmental Research, 83(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S. (1989). Analysis of events in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 119–141.

  • Petersilia, J. (2011). Beyond the prison bubble. The Wilson Quarterly, 35(1), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, J. F. (2012). The micro and macro causes of prison growth. Georgia State University Law Review, 28(4).

  • Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, S., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2001). Identifying the Effect of Unemployment on Crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, J.W. (2007). Environmental Policy as Social Policy? The Impact of Childhood Lead Exposure on Crime. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1).

  • Roman, J. K., & Farrell, G. (2002). Cost-benefit analysis for crime prevention: Opportunity costs, routine savings and crime externalities. Crime Prevention Studies, 14, 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment Assignment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. (2002). Crime Decline in Context. Contexts, 1(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R., & Fornango, R. (2007). The impact of economic conditions on robbery and property crime: The role of consumer sentiment. Criminology, 45(4), 735–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R., & Lopez, E. (2020). Pandemic, social unrest, and crime in US Cities. Council on Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7(1), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1994). Urban Poverty and the Family Context of Delinquency: A New Look at Structure and Process in a Classic Study. Child Development, 65(2), 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdula, M. K., Brewer, R. D., Gillespie, C., Denny, C. H., & Mokdad, A. (2004). Trends in alcohol use and binge drinking, 1985–1999: Results of a multi-state survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(4), 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevigny, E. L., Pollack, H. A., & Reuter, P. (2013). Can drug courts help to reduce prison and jail populations". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 190–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P., Torrats-Espinosa, G., & Takyar, D. (2017). Community and the Crime Decline: The Causal Effect of Local Nonprofits on Violent Crime. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1214–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L.W. (1997). Policing for Crime Prevention. In Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What's Promising - A Report to the Attorney General of the United States (NCJ 165366). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

  • Siegel, M., Ross, C. S., & King, C. (2013). The relationship between gun ownership and firearm homicide rates in the United States, 1981–2010. American Journal of Public Health, 103(11), 2098–2105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (2006). Police and Community in Chicago: A Tale of Three Cities. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L. (2014). Effects of causes and causes of effects: Some remarks from the sociological side. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(3), 406–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W. (2006). The Limited Importance of Prison Expansion. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The Crime Drop in America (pp. 97–129). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W. (1994). Criminal Incapacitation. Springer, US.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tchetgen, E. J. T. (2022). An (Un)Holy Union: Causal inference, semiparametric statistics and machine learning in the age of data science. Columbia University Distinguished Speaker Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Morris, N., & Groff, E. (2009). Hot A Longitudinal Study of Arrest Incidents at Street Segments. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G.L. & Wilson, J.Q. (1982). Broken Windows. The Atlantic, 249(3), 29–38.

  • Wright, R., Tekin, E., Topalli, V., McClellan, C., Dickinson, T., & Rosenfeld, R. (2017). Less cash, less crime: Evidence from the electronic benefit transfer program. The Journal of Law and Economics, 60(2), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2007). The Great American Crime Decline. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    John K. Roman

  2. Bethesda, MD, USA

    John K. Roman

Authors
  1. John K. Roman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roman, J.K. From Causal Mechanisms to Policy Mechanisms: Why Did Crime Decline and What Lessons Can Be Learned from It?. Am J Crim Just 47, 1116–1139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09714-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09714-4

Keywords

  • Violence
  • Justice System Reform
  • Crime Decline