Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Associations between Legal Representation and Mental Health Court Outcomes

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study empirically examines the associations between legal representation and four key outcomes in mental health courts. The outcomes include whether eligible defendants chose to participate in a municipal mental health court (MMHC); if defendants chose to participate, whether the MMHC resolved their criminal charges without court supervision; whether eligible defendants attended the initial MMHC court hearings; and whether defendants successfully completed the MMHC program. The study included 1012 defendants who were accepted into a MMHC in a state where municipal court defendants do not have to be represented by a defense attorney. We conducted bivariate and logistic regression analyses to identify differences in each of the four outcomes between MMHC defendants who did or did not have a defense attorney. The results of the bivariate and logistic regression analyses found defendants represented by defense attorneys were more likely to choose not to participate in the MMHC, to resolve their criminal charges without court supervision, to participate in initial court hearings, and to successfully complete the MMHC program. All four regression models were statistically significant, although the amount of variance explained was relatively low, ranging from 6% to 13%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. (2020). Criminal justice standards for the defense function. Accessed at https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition/ on April 23, 2020.

  • Arkfeld, L. C. (2007). Ethics for the problem-solving court judge: The new ABA model code. The Justice System Journal, 28(3), 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, H. (2012). Too many clients, too little time: How states are forcing public defenders to violate their ethical obligations. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 25(2), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, R. A., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Petrila, J. (2003). The Broward County mental health court: Process, outcomes, and service utilization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. T., Zuelsdorff, M., & Gassman, M. (2009). Treatment retention among African Americans in the Dane county drug treatment court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(4), 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, D., Marchbanks III, M. P., Kiven, M., Klavensma, L., Durkin, M. B., & Fabelo, T. (2010, April). Representing the mentally ill offender: An evaluation of advocacy options. Austin, TX: Office of Court Administration, Texas Task Force on Indigent Defense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, T. (2004). When good intentions are not enough: Problem-solving courts and the impending crisis of legitimacy. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 57, 1459–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, U. (2011). Courting compliance: Case managers as “double agents” in the mental health court. Law and Society, 36(2), 484–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, U. (2017). The politics of benchcraft: The role of judges in mental health courts. Law and Social Inquiry, 43(2), 398–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, P. K., Deka, K., & Chetia, D. (2006). Disability associated with mental disorders. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(2), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Bar Foundation. (2014, August 1). The municipal court advice desk. Accessed at https://chicagobarfoundation.org/blog/campaign-in-action/municipal-court-advice-desk/ on April 27, 2020.

  • Council of State Governments. (2005, May). A guide to mental health court design and implementation. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisler, C. (2005). Building trust and managing risk: A look at a felony mental health court. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(4), 587–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Wasylyshyn, S. M., & El-Masri, M. M. (2005). Handling missing data in self-report measures. Reseach in Nursing and Health, 28(6), 488–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geronimus, A. T., Bound, J., & Neidert, L. J. (1996). On the validity of using census geocode characteristics to proxy individual socioeconomic characteristics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griller, G. M., Williams, Y. E., Brown III, R. R., & Hall, D. J. (2015, November). Missouri municipal courts: Best practices recommendations. Williamsburg, VA: National Council for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimowitz, S. (2002). Can mental health courts end the criminalization of persons with mental illness? Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1226–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakulinen, C., McGrath, J. J., Timmerman, A., Skipper, N., Mortensen, P. B., Pedersen, C. B., & Agerbo, E. (2019). The association between early-onset schizophrenia with employment, income, education, and cohabitation status: Nationwide study with 35 years of follow-up. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54, 1343–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. W. (2000, November). Defense counsel in criminal cases (NCJ 179023). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Holland, P. (2010). Lawyering and learning in problem-solving courts. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 34, 185–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honegger, L. N. (2015). Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, C. E. (2002). Criminalization of the mentally ill: The challenging role of the defense attorney in the mental health court system. UMCK Law Review, 71(1), 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempinen, B. (2011). Problem-solving courts and the defense function: The Wisconsin experience. Hastings Law Journal, 62(5), 1349–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, J. H., Murrell, P., Tauber, J., Zeidman, S. M., Calabrese, A., & Hendricks, S. (2002). The impact of problem solving on the lawyer’s role and ethics. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 25(5), 1982–1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak, S., Comartin, E. B., Ray, B., & Tillander, E. (2018). The effect of systems collaboration on the individual outcomes of mental health court participants: A multi-site study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 60, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link-Gelles, R., Westreich, D., Aiello, A. E., Shang, N., Weber, D. J., Holtzman, C., S,….Moore, M. R. (2016). Bias with respect to socioeconomic status: A closer look at zip code matching in a pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness study. SSM – Population Health, 2, 587–594.

  • Lowder, E. M., Rade, C. B., & Desmarais, S. L. (2018). Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: A meta-analysis. Psychiatric Services, 69(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, M. L. (2001). Who is diverted? Case selection for court-monitored mental health treatment. Law and Policy, 23(2), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2010). Stakeholder views of a mental health court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and treatment court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustard, C. A., Derksen, S., Berthelot, J., & Wolfson, M. (1999). Assessing ecological proxies for household income: A comparison of household and neighbourhood level income measures in the study of population health. Health and Place, 5(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B. (2015, November 13). Special report on municipal courts: Few municipal court defendants have attorneys. Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service. Accessed at https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2015/11/13/special-report-on-municipal-courts-few-municipal-court-defendants-have-lawyers/ on April 27, 2020.

  • Poythress, N. G., Petrila, J., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward mental health court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 517–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, B., Hood, B. J., & Canada, K. E. (2015). What happened to mental health court noncompleters? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(6), 801–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D. (2005). Voluntary, but knowing and intelligent? Comprehension in mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(4), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Hoover, S., Summers, A., & Steadman, H. J. (2010). Enrollment in mental health courts: Voluntariness, knowingness, and adjudicative competency. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., & Petrila, J. (2006). Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarteschi, C. M., Vaughn, M. G., & Kim, K. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. D., Bloom, H., & Heerema, M. (2007). Mental health courts: Decriminalizing the mentally ill. Toronto: Irwin Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, T. (2005). Mental health courts: A misguided attempt to address the criminal justice systems’ unfair treatment of people with mental illness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(4), 570–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S., & Peterson, J. K. (2011). Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedker, K. A. (2018). Therapeutic justice: Crime, treatment courts, and mental illness. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snedker, K. A., Beach, L. R., & Corcoran, K. E. (2017). Beyond the “revolving door?” incentives and criminal recidivism in a mental health court. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(9), 1141–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soobader, M., LeClere, F. B., Hadden, W., & Maury, B. (2001). Using aggregate geographical data to proxy individual socioeconomic status: Does size matter? American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 632–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LL.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Bar of Texas. (2020). Municipal courts: A primer on what they do and a look at the national conversation regarding indigent defendants. Accessed at https://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=articles&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=43958 on April 27, 2020.

  • Stefan, S., & Winick, B. J. (2005). A dialogue on mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(4), 507–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S. M. (2016, November, Revised may 3, 2017). State-administered indigent defense systems, 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Strong, S. M., Rantala, R. R., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2016, September). Census of problem-solving courts, 2012 (NCJ 249803). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Osher, F., & Tomasini-Joshi, D. (2007). Improving responses to people with mental illness: The essential elements of a mental health court. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). American community survey. Accessed at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs to march 22, 2020.

  • Waters, N. L., Strickland, S. M., & Gibson, S. A. (2009, November). Mental health court culture: Leaving your hat at the door. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, N., Fabrikant, N., & Belenko, S. (2011). Mental health courts and their selection processes: Modeling variation for consistency. Law and Human Behavior, 35(5), 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivin, K., Bohnert, A. S. B., Mezuk, B., Ilgen, M. A., Welsh, D., Ratliff, S., et al. (2011). Employment status of patients in the VA health system: Implications for mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 62(1), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Donald M. Linhorst & Jacob Eikenberry

  2. School of Social Work, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    David Kondrat

  3. Department of Criminal Justice Studies, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA

    P. Ann Dirks-Linhorst

Authors
  1. Donald M. Linhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Kondrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacob Eikenberry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Ann Dirks-Linhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Ann Dirks-Linhorst.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Availability of Data and Material

Permission to access the data used in this study must be granted from the agency that originally provided it. Interested individuals should contact the corresponding author, who would in turn contact the agency with the request.

Code Availability

If the agency grants permission to release the dataset used in this study, the authors will release the codebook generated by SPSS.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linhorst, D.M., Kondrat, D., Eikenberry, J. et al. Associations between Legal Representation and Mental Health Court Outcomes. Am J Crim Just 47, 75–97 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09594-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09594-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation