Abstract
The harms crime victims experience extend far beyond the initial victimization and can have severe negative impacts on daily life. Using data collected via a self-report survey from 477 cyberstalking victims, the current study explores the consequences associated with being cyberstalked. Specifically, we seek to identify which characteristics of the victimization incident, cyberstalker, and victim impact the likelihood of experiencing four types of consequences – those that are school-, work-, social-, and health-related. Findings revealed that dimensions of the incident, along with offender and victim characteristics, were significantly related to experiencing consequences as a result of being cyberstalked. A discussion of these findings and suggestions for future research are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Workers on MTurk are paid as little as $0.01 per HIT. Rewards are very rarely larger than $1.00 (Paolacci, Chandler, & Ipeirotis, 2010).
Communication technologies are products that transmit or receive communication electronically.
This definition is grounded in existing literature and legal statutes.
Other gender included genderqueer or gender non-conforming, transgender men, transgender women, and questioning.
For example, experiencing health consequences would not impact the victim-offender relationship, or gender of victim/offender. Thus, temporal ordering is not a concern here.
References
Banyard, V. L. (2014). Improving college campus–based prevention of violence against women: A strategic plan for research built on multipronged practices and policies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 339–351.
Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 224527.
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
Blaauw, E., Winkel, F. W., Arensman, E., Sheridan, L., & Freeve, A. (2002). The toll of stalking: The relationship between features of stalking and psychopathology of victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(1), 50–63.
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., & Blanken, I. (2014). Does recalling moral behavior change the perception of brightness?: A replication and meta-analysis of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012). Social Psychology, 45(3), 246–252.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2019). Number of violent victimizations by injury, 2019. Generated using the NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool at http://www.bjs.gov, January 30, 2019.
Chen, D. L., & Horton, J. J. (2016). Are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Information System Research, 27(2), 403–423.
DeLisi, M., Jones-Johnson, G., Johnson, W. R., & Hochstetler, A. (2014). The aftermath of criminal victimization: Race, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 60(1), 85–105.
DeMaris, A., & Kaukinen, C. (2005). Violent victimization and women's mental and physical health: Evidence from a national sample. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 384–411.
Dietz, N. A., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Women who are stalked: Questioning the fear standard. Violence Against Women, 13(7), 750–776.
Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(2), 61–67.
Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Fissel, E. R. (2018). The reporting and help-seeking behaviors of cyberstalking victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801942.
Fissel, E. R. (2019). Victimization of the 21stcentury: An examination of cyberstalking victimization using the target congruence approach (Doctoral dissertation).
Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 74–84.
Hutton, S., & Haantz, S. (2003). Cyber stalking. Retrieved from National White Collar Crime Center Web site: http://www.nw3c.org.
Johnson, M. C., & Kercher, G. A. (2009). Identifying predictors of negative psychological reactions to stalking victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(5), 866–882.
Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). Reply to “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A comment.”. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 159–162.
Kraft, E., & Wang, J. (2010). An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 1(4), 74–91.
Lane, J., Rader, N. E., Henson, B., Fisher, B. S., & May, D. C. (2014). Fear of crime in the United States: Causes, consequences, and contradictions. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Magyarics, C. L., Lynch, K. R., Golding, J. M., & Lippert, A. (2015). The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgements involving a criminal stalking case. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602–613.
McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H. (2010). The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 108(1–2), 98–109.
Melde, C., & Rennison, C. M. (2008). The effect of gang perpetrated crime on the likelihood of non-lethal victim injury. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 234–251.
Ménard, K. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2012). Predicting overt and cyber stalking perpetration by male and female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2183–2207.
Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2016). Toward an understanding of the emotional and behavioral reactions to stalking: A partial test of general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 62(6), 703–727.
Nobles, M. R., Reyns, B. W., Fox, K. A., & Fisher, B. S. (2014). Protection against pursuit: A conceptual and empirical comparison of cyberstalking and stalking victimization among a national sample. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 986–1014.
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgement and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
Parsons-Pollard, N., & Moriarty, L. J. (2009). Cyberstalking: Utilizing what we do know. Victims and Offenders, 4(4), 435–441.
Pogarsky, G., Roche, S. P., & Pickett, J. T. (2017). Heuristics and biases, rational choice, and sanction perceptions. Criminology, 55(1), 85–111.
Randa, R., & Reyns, B. W. (2019). The physical and emotional toll of identity theft victimization: A situational and demographic analysis of the National Crime Victimization Survey. Deviant Behavior, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1612980.
Ratner, K. G., Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J., van Knippenberg, A., & Amodio, D. M. (2014). Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: Implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 897–911.
Reno, J. W. (1999). 1999 Report on cyberstalking: A new challenge for law enforcement and industry. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Reyns, B. W. (2019). Online pursuit in the twilight zone: Cyberstalking perpetration by college students. Victims and Offenders, 14(2), 183–198.
Reyns, B. W., & Englebrecht, C. M. (2010). The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 998–1005.
Reyns, B. W., & Englebrecht, C. M. (2013). The fear factor: Exploring predictors of fear among stalking victims throughout the stalking encounter. Crime & Delinquency, 59(5), 788–808.
Reyns, B. W., & Englebrecht, C. M. (2014). Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(10), 1178–1194.
Reyns, B. W., & Fisher, B. S. (2018). The relationship between offline and online stalking victimization: A gender-specific analysis. Violence and Victims, 33(4), 769–786.
Reyns, B. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying Cyberlifestyle-routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1149–1169.
Shapland, J., & Hall, M. (2007). What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? International Review of Victimology, 14(2), 175–217.
Sheridan, L. P., & Grant, T. (2007). Is cyberstalking different? Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(6), 627–640.
Sheridan, L. P., & Lyndon, A. E. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 340–350.
Short, E., Guppy, A., Hart, J. A., & Barnes, J. (2015). The impact of cyberstalking. Studies in Media and Communication, 3(2), 23–37.
Short, E., Linford, S., Wheatcroft, J. M., & Maple, C. (2014). The impact of cyberstalking: The lived experience-a thematic analysis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199, 133–137.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 71–92.
Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2014). “Ditto heads”: Do conservatives perceive greater consensus within their ranks than liberals? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1162–1177.
Tillyer, M. S., Miller, J. M., & Tillyer, R. (2011). The environmental and situational correlates of victim injury in nonfatal violent incidents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(5), 433–452.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence against women survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 241–161.
Worsley, J. D., Wheatcroft, J. M., Short, E., & Corcoran, R. (2017). Victims’ voices: Understanding the emotional impact of cyberstalking and individuals’ coping responses. SAGE Open, 7(2), 1–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fissel, E.R., Reyns, B.W. The Aftermath of Cyberstalking: School, Work, Social, and Health Costs of Victimization. Am J Crim Just 45, 70–87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09489-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09489-1