Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing Predictors of Drinking and Driving among Gender Cohorts within a College Sample

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study focuses on predominant predictors associated with men’s and women’s engagement in driving under the influence (DUI) in an attempt to determine whether gender-specific interventions would be more affective at reducing impaired vehicle operation. A male-only subsample (n = 863) and a female-only subsample (n = 975) from a survey administered at a large Southeastern university containing self-reported measures of DUI were used to evaluate gender differences in motivations and correlates of DUI behavior. A series of logistic regressions containing indicators drawn from theories of deviant behavior (e.g., Akers’ social learning theory (SLT) and Gottfredson and Hirshi’s low self-control (LSC) theory) yield results indicating that differential association and imitation, both factors associated with SLT, are significant predictors for both gender cohorts’ DUI behavior. Low self- control was a significant predictor within female-only models, but not the final male-only models. This suggests that peer associations and modeling may be targets of intervention generally, but that, as it relates to DUIs, women may particularly benefit from programs focused at limiting impulsivity and risk-taking behavior as these are components of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s LSC construct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (2011). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batton, C., & Ogle, R. S. (2003). Who’s it gonna be-you or me? The potential of social learning for integrated homicide-suicide theory. Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in Criminological Theory, 11, 85–108.

  • Begg, D., Langley, J., & Stephenson, S. (2003). Identifying factors that predict persistent driving after drinking, unsafe driving after drinking, and driving after using cannabis among young adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 669–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitel, G., Sharp, M., & Glauz, W. (2000). Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol. Injury Prevention, 6(2), 158–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, J., & Rice, S. (2011). The influence of the social bond on self-control at the moment of decision: Testing Hirschi's redefinition of self-control. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., et al. (1998). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, A. T., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Applying social learning theory to police misconduct. Deviant Behavior, 25(2), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1261–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMartino, C. H., Rice, R. E., & Saltz, R. (2015). An applied test of the social learning theory of deviance to college alcohol use. Journal of health communication, 20(4), 479–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBlasio, F. A. (1986). Drinking adolescents on the roads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, N. T., Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., Elder, R. W., Shults, R. A., & Jiles, R. (2008). Patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-impaired driving in the United States. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 32, 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Akers, R. L. (2011). Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingson, R., & Winter, M. (2003). Epidemiology and consequences of drinking and driving. Alcohol Research & Health, 27(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingson, R., Zha, W., & Weitzman, E. R. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 1(16) 12–20.

  • LaBrie, J. W., Lac, A., Kenney, S. R., & Mirza, T. (2011). Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: Gender and race differences. Addictive behaviors, 36(4), 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapham, S. C., Baca, J. C. D., McMillan, G. P., & Lapidus, J. (2006). Psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat impaired-driving offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(5), 707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., Akers, R. L., & Borg, M. J. (2004). Social learning and structural factors in adolescent substance use. Western Criminology Review, 5(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S., & Pederson, L. (1990). The characteristics of alcoholics in treatment arrested for driving while impaired. British Journal of Addiction, 85(1), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Z. T. (1992). Social class differences in parental and peer influence on adolescent drug use. Deviant Behavior, 13(4), 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meesmann, U., Martensen, H., & Dupont, E. (2015). Impact of alcohol checks and social norm on driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997). A social learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. L., & Stogner, J. M. (2015). Keeping it between the buoys: Assessing self-reported boating under the influence (BUI) in a young adult population. Deviant Behavior, 36(1), 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2014). 2013 Data: Alcohol-Impaired Driving. http://www.nhtsa.gov.

  • Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self- control scale. Criminology, 38, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, C. L. (1993). A consideration of factors influencing drinking and driving by women. Alcohol, Drugs & Driving, 9(3-4), 197–209.

  • Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, P., & Goodfellow, M. (2006). Cohort comparisons: Social learning explanations for alcohol use among adolescents and older adults. Addictive Behaviors, 31(12), 2268–2283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. D., & Fromme, K. (2012). Personal and contextual factors in the escalation of driving after drinking across the college years. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 714–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisenberry, P. (2015). Texting and driving: Can it be explained by the general theory of crime? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebellon, C. J. (2002). Reconsidering the broken homes/delinquency relationship and exploring its mediating mechanism(s). Criminology, 40(1), 103–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. A., Liew, H., & Gardner, S. (2011). An evaluation of the narrowing gender gap in DUI arrests. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1414–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2008). Gender differences in drunk driving prevalence rates and trends: A 20-year assessment using multiple sources of evidence. Addictive Behaviors, 33(9), 1217–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smångs, M. (2010). Delinquency, social skills and the structure of peer relations: Assessing criminological theories by social network theory. Social Forces, 89(2), 609–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., Cooper, A. D., & Mulako-Wangota, J. (2016). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Arrests of all persons for driving under the Influence. Generated using the Arrest Data Analysis Tool at www.bjs.gov.

  • Starkey, N., & Charlton, S. (2014). The effects of moderate alcohol concentrations on driving and cognitive performance during ascending and descending blood alcohol concentrations. Human Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 370–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, I. Y., & Longazel, J. G. (2008). College students' alcohol-related problems: A test of competing theories. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(6), 554–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. A., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(4), 333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, N., & Fillmore, M. (2014). Alcohol effects on simulated driving performance and self- perceptions of impairment in DUI offenders. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22(6), 484–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, H., Lee, J., Nelson, T., & Lee, H. (2003). Drinking and driving among college students: The influence of alcohol-control policies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells-Parker, E., Pang, M. G., Anderson, B. J., McMillen, D. L., & Miller, D. I. (1991). Female DUI offenders: a comparison to male counterparts and an examination of the effects of intervention on women’s recidivism rates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(2), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree Jr., L. T., Bäckström, T. V., & Mays, G. L. (1994). Social learning theory, self-reported delinquency, and youth gangs: A new twist on a general theory of crime and delinquency. Youth & Society, 26(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree Jr, L. T., Giever, D. M., Maupin, J. R., & Mays, G. L. (2007). Drunk driving and the prediction of analogous behavior: A longitudinal test of social learning and self-control theories. Victims and Offenders, 2(4), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zador, P. L., Krawchuk, S. A., & Voas, R. B. (2000). Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(3), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Wieczorek, W., & Welte, J. (2012). The influence of parental and peer drinking behaviors on underage drinking and driving by young men. Journal of Drug Education, 42(3), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Lee Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoyle, J., Miller, B.L., Stogner, J.M. et al. Analyzing Predictors of Drinking and Driving among Gender Cohorts within a College Sample. Am J Crim Just 43, 754–767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9431-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9431-5

Keywords

Navigation