Skip to main content

Service Providers’ Knowledge and Perceptions of the Legal Service Needs of Crime Victims

Abstract

Currently, there is an expansive body of victimization literature within the criminal justice field, which covers a number of essential topics such as victimization trends and patterns, short-and long-term effects of victimization, as well as specific effects of intimate partner violence and sexual assault victimization. Despite the variety of topics examined by empirical research, there is a noticeable lack of discourse pertaining to civil legal services for crime victims. This study is among the first to take a close look at civil legal services for victims by exploring three uncharted areas including: (a) service providers’ knowledge of civil legal services, (b) the legal needs of crime victims and available services, and (c) barriers between victims and accessing civil legal services. Using quantitative and qualitative data from interviews with service providers, policy implications and future research recommendations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Nine of the 47 original respondents did not qualify as direct service providers and were subsequently excluded from the analyses. These included state and local advocacy organizations. These agencies were included in the broader project to assess policy considerations in meeting the legal service needs of crime victims. For the purposes of this study, we were specifically interested in the views of those who interact with victims on a daily basis and have experience assessing their needs and barriers.

  2. Quotes used throughout the results section reflect comments provided by respondents during the interview.

  3. This service would be provided if/when victims needed to be in contact with the defense attorney representing the perpetrator in their case.

References

  • Allen, N. E., Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2004). Battered women’s multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women, 10, 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. K., Cook, S. L., & Norris, F. H. (2003). Domestic violence and housing problems: A contextual analysis of women’s help-seeking, received informal support, and formal system response. Violence Against Women, 9(7), 754–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. K., Billhardt, K. A., Warren, J., Rollins, C., & Glass, N. E. (2010). Domestic violence housing instability, and homelessness: A review of housing polici8es and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. W. (2000). Why battered women do not leave, part 1: External inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1, 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., Riger, S., Schewe, P., Howard, A., & Wasco, S. (2004). Effectiveness of hotline, advocacy, counseling, and shelter services for victims of domestic violence: A statewide evaluation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E., & Chantler, K. (2005). Domestic violence and minoritisation: Legal and policy barriers facing minoritized women leaving violent relationships. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, L. B., Grossman, J., & Chapman, A. R. (2015). The goals of IPV survivors receiving orders of protection: An application of the empowerment process model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–23.

  • Eastman, B. J., Bunch, S. G., Williams, A. H., & Carawan, L. W. (2007). Exploring the perceptions of domestic violence service providers in rural localities. Violence Against Women, 13, 700–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few, A. L., & Rosen, K. H. (2005). Victims of chronic dating violence: How women’s vulnerabilities link to their decision to stay. Family Relations, 54, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, P. (1989). Statutory authority in the use and enforcement of civil protection orders against domestic abuse. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, M., Landis, L., Riordan, K., Naureckas, S., & Engel, B. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grama, J. (2000). Women forgotten: Difficulties faced by rural victims of domestic violence. Journal of Family Law, 14, 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwinn, C., Strack, G., Adams, S., Lovelace, R., & Norman, D. (2007). The family justice center collaborative model. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 47(79), 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, C., Renner, L., & Mackel, S. (2013). Civil legal services and domestic violence: Missed service opportunities. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstein, L. E., & Thurman, Q. C. (2006). Assessing the need for domestic violence victim services in one rural county. Police Quarterly, 9, 448–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Lumley, T., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2002). Civil protection orders and risk of subsequent police-reported violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(5), 589–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 24(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Law and Justice. (2005). National evaluation of the legal assistance for victim programs (NIJ publication no. 208612). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  • Keilitz, S. L. (1994). Civil protection orders: A viable justice system tool for deterring domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 9(1), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Gray, K. A. (2008). Leave or stay? Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1465–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, S. J., Bell, H., & Rhodes, D. M. (2012). Back to basics: Essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, M., Popelier, L., & Varekamp, E. (2015). Victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system and emotional recovery: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16, 336–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, L. (2011). Use of victim service agencies by victims of serious violence crime, 1993–2009. (NCJ Publication No. 234212). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Legal Services Corporation. (2007). Documenting the justice gap in America: The current unmet civil legal needs of low-income Americans. Retrieved from http://www.lsc.gov/sites/default/files/LSC/images/justicegap.pdf.

  • Logan, T. K., Stevenson, E., Evans, L., & Leukefeld, C. (2004). Rural and urban women’s perceptions of barriers to health, mental health, and criminal justice services: Implications for victim services. Violence and Victims, 19, 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., Evans, L., Stevenson, E., & Jordan, C. E. (2005). Barriers to services for rural and urban survivors of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 591–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., Shannon, L., Walker, R., & Faragher, T. M. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 7(3), 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, R. J., Giattina, M. C., Parish, S. L., & Crosby, C. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Historical concerns and contemporary challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, J., Patternson, M., & Johnson, S. (2012). Meeting the training needs of those who meet the needs of victims: Assessing service providers. Violence and Victims, 27, 609–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, E., & Carlton, A. (2001). Victim services, community outreach, and contemporary rape crisis centers: A comparison of independent and multiservice centers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Victims of Crime. (2013). Vision 21: Transforming victim services, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.

  • Orloff, L. E., Jang, D., & Klein, C. F. (1995). With no place to turn: Improving legal advocacy for battered immigrant women. Family Law Quarterly, 29(2), 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavao, J., Alvarez, J., Baumrind, N., Induni, M., & Kimerling, R. (2007). Intimate partner violence and housing instability. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 32, 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, J. (1997). The tactics and strategies of men who batter. In A. P. Cararelli (Ed.), Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes, and effects (pp. 48–69). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women the roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay? Three decades of research. Aggression and Violence Behavior, 3, 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., Ahrens, C., & Blickenstaff, A. (2000). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. Violence and Victims, 15, 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F., Falk, D. R., & Elliott, B. A. (2002). Enhancing coordinated community responses to reduce recidivism in cases of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B., Yost, B., & Abbott, C. (2005). Use and nonuse of victim services programs: Implications from a statewide survey of crime victims. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, J. E., & Logan, T. K. (2005). Domestic violence and employment: A qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, J. E., Logan, T. K., & Macke, C. (2005). Intimate partner violence, employment, and workplace consequences and future directions. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6(4), 286–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobolowsky, P.M., Gaboury, M.T., Jackson, A.L., & Blackburn, A.G. (2010). Crime victim rights and remedies (2nd Ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

  • Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence Against Women, 7(2), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M., & Wang, H. (2005). Domestic violence and women’s employment: Fixed effects models of three waves of women’s employment study data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. E., & Townsend, S. M. (2007). Barriers to working with sexual assault survivors. Violence Against Women, 13, 412–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, A. N. (1999). Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship. Families in Society, 80, 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted with funds from Grant 20120VF-GX-K019 provided by the Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leana A. Bouffard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouffard, L.A., Nobles, M.R., Goodson, A. et al. Service Providers’ Knowledge and Perceptions of the Legal Service Needs of Crime Victims. Am J Crim Just 42, 589–609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9374-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9374-2

Keywords