Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Analysis of CRIPA Findings Letters Issued to Jails for Constitutional Violations by the Department of Justice

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzes Findings Letters in jail Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) cases for the years 1993 through 2013 to improve our understanding of the prevalence, content and correlates of constitutional violations investigated by the Department of Justice. CRIPA authorizes the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and file suit against local jail facilities for the unconstitutional conditions of individuals in their care. Investigating the allegations and providing local officials a Findings Letter are the first steps in a CRIPA action and determine what remedial action must be taken to avoid a federal lawsuit. The analysis revealed a high incidence of certain constitutional violations, longitudinal trends, and facility characteristics associated with CRIPA action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Correctional Association (ACA). (2010). Core jail standards. East Peoria, IL: Versa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barczyk, A., & Davis, K. (2009). Analysis of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) of 1980: the current avenue for protecting individuals in institutions. Journal of Policy Practice, 8, 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, B., & Arthur, P. (2006). Advocates needed to safeguard rights of youth in DOC conditions cases. Youth Law News, 27, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, P. M., & Garrett, J. S. (1999). Prison and jail administration: practice and theory. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, E. A. (2014). Prisoners in 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq.

  • Clem, C., Gordon, C., Sheanin, D., & Smith, T. (2006). Direct supervision jails 2006 sourcebook. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbstein, J., & Wener, R. E. (1989). A comparison of “direct” and “indirect” supervision correctional facilities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections Prison Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, J., & Lee, L. (2013). Department of justice finding letters in psychiatric hospital CRIPA cases. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41, 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, G. F. (1993). Direct supervision. American Jails, 7, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. (2010). NJDC fact sheet: using the civil rights of institutionalized persons act to protect detained and incarcerated youth. Washington, DC: National Juvenile Defender Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates (NCJ 213600). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauth, B. K. (1997). A review of the jail function within state unified corrections systems. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. & Clem, C. (2011). ACA’s core jail standards focus on the basis. National jail exchange. National Institute of Corrections. Available at http://NICIC.gov/NationalJailExchange.

  • National Council on Disabilities. (2005). The civil rights of institutionalized persons act: has it fulfilled its promise? Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, M. E., Rohloff, H., & Ginder, S. (2015). Mortality in local jails and state prisons, 2000–2013 – Statistical tables. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Oahu Community Correctional Center. (2007). Office for civil rights letter of finding. U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Phillips, R. L., & Roberts, J. W. (2000). Quick reference to correctional administration. Gaitherersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddell, R., & Mays, G. L. (2007). Rural jails: problematic inmates, overcrowded cells, and cash-strapped counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, M. (2003). Inmate litigation: results of a national survey. LJN Exchange: the journal of NIC’s large jail network. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.

  • Solomon, A., Osborne, J., LoBuglio, S., Mellow, J., & Mukamal, D. (2008). Life after lockup: improving reentry from jail to the community. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, J. & Walsh, G. (2011). Census of jail facilities, 2006. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Stinchcomb, J. B., & Campbell, S. W. (2007). Jail leaders speak: current and future challenges to jail administration and operations. A summary report to the bureau of justice assistance. Naples, FL: The Center for Innovative Public Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, B. A. (2015). The growth of federal criminal justice policy making: the role of U.S. civil rights legislation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strait, S., & Ahlborn, T. (2009). New “core jail standards” provide sheriffs and jail managers with much-needed guidance. Corrections Today, 71, 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2001. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2002). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2002. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2003). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2003. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2004. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2005). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2005. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2006). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2006. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2007). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2007. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2008. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2009). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2009. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2010. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2011). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2011. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2012). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act: fiscal year 2012. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2013). Department of justice activities under the civil rights of institutionalized person act: fiscal year 2013. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Civil rights division, special litigation, corrections, cases and matters. Available at http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/findsettle.php#corrections.

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). U.S. Department of Justice: information on employment litigation, housing and civil enforcement, voting, and special litigation sections’ enforcement efforts from fiscal years 2001 through 2007 (GAO-10-75). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Michigan Law School’s Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse. (2015). Available at: http://www.clearinghouse.net.

  • Wallenstein, A. (1987). New generation/direct supervision correctional operations in bucks county, Pennsylvania. American Jails, 1, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, W. N. (1995). Counties in court: jail overcrowding and court-ordered reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  • Wener, R. E., Farbstein, J., & Knapel, C. (1993). Post occupancy evaluations: improving correctional facility design. Corrections Today, 55, 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wener, R. E., & Olsen, R. (1980). Innovative correctional environments: a user assessment. Environment and Behavior, 12, 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. L., Rodeheaver, D., & Huggins, D. (1999). A comparative evaluation of a new generation jail. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, L. L., & Stohr-Gillmore, M. K. (1988). Doing time in the new generation jail: inmate perceptions of gains and losses. Policy Studies Review, 7, 626–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, 10019, USA

    Jeff Mellow & Mijin Kim

  2. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., USA

    Bryce E. Peterson

Authors
  1. Jeff Mellow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bryce E. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mijin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Mellow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mellow, J., Peterson, B.E. & Kim, M. An Analysis of CRIPA Findings Letters Issued to Jails for Constitutional Violations by the Department of Justice. Am J Crim Just 42, 69–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9347-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9347-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation