Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Differences in Acquisitive Delinquency: A Macro-Level Routine Activities Analysis

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines macro-level variation in juvenile theft and burglary arrest rates using a sample of 127 large cities in the United States. Independent variables were drawn from routine activities theory and included measures of guardianship (e.g., portion of families with both parents working, police to resident ratio, etc.), the number of motivated offenders (e.g., portion of the population under age 18), and the availability of suitable targets (e.g., poverty rates). Both ordinary least squares and weighted least squares regression analyses were performed. These analyses found that the significant predictors varied between burglary and theft. Additionally, there were differences in the predictors which significantly affected the arrest rates of male and female juveniles. However, within each offense the models explained similar portions of the overall variation in arrests for both genders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, R. R. (1991). Routine activities: A cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70(1), 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B. (1989). A macro social analysis of the change in robbery and homicide rates: Controlling for static and dynamic effects. Sociological Focus, 22(4), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (1995). Assessing Messner and Rosenfeld’s institutional anomie theory: A partial test. Criminology, 33(3), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H. (1999). Routine activities and motor vehicle theft: A crime specific approach. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E., Hughes, T., Ricketts, M. L., & Wolfe, S. E. (2008). Identity theft complaints: Exploring the state-level correlates. Journal of Financial Crime, 15(3), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L. W., & Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28(1), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange, T. C. (1999). The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? The American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 922–963.

  • Markowitz, F. E., Bellaire, P. E., Liska, A. E., & Liu, J. (2001). Extending social disorganization theory: Modeling the relationships between cohesion, disorder, and fear. Criminology, 39(2), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002). Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach, OR: MJM Software Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T. L. (2001). Assessing the race-violence relationship at the macro level: The assumption of racial invariance and the problem of restricted distributions. Criminology, 39(2), 467–490.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Blau, J. R. (1987). Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: A macro-level analysis. Social Forces, 65(4), 1035–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, C. (2001). Predicting drug arrest rates: Conflict and social disorganization perspectives. Crime and Delinquency, 47(1), 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, C. W., & Wright, R. (2003). Gender, social networks, and residential burglary. Criminology, 41(3), 813–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., & Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, W., Joo, H. J., & Lawton, B. (2010). Juvenile arrest rates for burglary: A routine activities approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 572–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocque, M., Posick, C., Barkan, S. E., & Paternoster, R. (2015). Marriage and county-level crime rates: A research note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 130–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D. W., & Faggiani, D. (1985). High schools and crime: A replication. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D. W., & LoBosco, A. (1983). The effect of high schools on crime in their neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 64(3), 598–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D. W., & Maier, P. A. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots”. Criminology, 29(4), 725–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. J., & Roberts, J. J. (2015). Now, later, or not at all: Personal and situational factors impacting burglars’ target choices. Journal of Crime and Justice online before print. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2015.1078253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Wooldredge, J. D. (1987). Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shihadeh, E. S., & Steffensmeier, D. J. (1994). Economic inequality, family disruption, and urban black violence: Cities as units of stratification and social control. Social Forces, 73(2), 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, D. S. (2015). A-priori sample size calculator for multiple regression [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.

  • Stahura, J. M., & Sloan, J. J. (1988). Urban stratification of places, routine activities and suburban crime rates. Social Forces, 66(4), 1102–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H. (2002). A convergence approach to the analysis of political corruption: A cross-national study. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 38(2), 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseloni, A., Wittebrood, K., Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (2004). Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and The Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 66–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau. (2014). 2013 American community survey 5-year estimates. Washington, D. C. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/index.php.

  • United States Census Bureau. (2015). Annual estimates of the resident population for incorporated places of 50,000 or more. Washington, D. C. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.

  • United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014a). Uniform crime reporting program data: Offenses known and clearances by arrest, 2013. ICPSR36122-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

  • United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014b). Uniform crime reporting program data: Police employee (LEOKA) data, 2013. ICPSR36119-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

  • Wadsworth, T. (2010). Is immigration responsible for the crime drop? An assessment of the influence of immigration on changes in violent crime between 1990 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 91(2), 531–553.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Administration of Justice Department, Penn State - New Kensington, 3550 Seventh Street Road, New Kensington, PA, 15068, USA

    Jeffrey J. Roth

Authors
  1. Jeffrey J. Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Roth.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The author received no funding for this research.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this analysis of publicly available secondary data, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, J.J. Gender Differences in Acquisitive Delinquency: A Macro-Level Routine Activities Analysis. Am J Crim Just 41, 796–813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9335-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9335-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation