American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 780–795 | Cite as

Prosecutors’ Perspectives on Elder Justice Using an Elder Abuse Forensic Center

  • Marguerite DeLiema
  • Adria E. Navarro
  • Melyssa Moss
  • Kathleen H. Wilber


Prosecution is a rare outcome in elder financial exploitation. Previous studies have shown that elder abuse forensic centers—multidisciplinary teams that help investigate and respond to elder mistreatment—increase prosecution rates by enhancing teamwork across agencies. Research is needed to identify what aspects of this intervention model lead to better elder justice outcomes. Six District Attorneys (DAs) were interviewed about their experiences working with other agencies at an elder abuse forensic center (the “Center”) and how participating in case discussions influenced their professional perspectives on elder abuse. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively revealing three themes: (1) “goal-driven” versus “mission-driven” professional orientations; (2) role blurring; and (3) value added from participating in the Center team. Important factors for increasing rates of prosecution were: (1) having key decision-makers present at the meeting; (2) the forensic expertise provided by the geriatrician and neuropsychologist; and (3) cross-discipline learning. Influenced by the other disciplines, DAs sought goals beyond prosecution as the default approach to resolving elder financial abuse and advocated for interventions that could best respond to the victim’s needs, such as restitution or protection.


Elder abuse and neglect Elder justice Prosecution Multidisciplinary team Forensic center Financial exploitation 



This work was supported in-kind by the participants and researchers and by the National Institute on Aging (NIAT32 AG000037).


  1. Blakely, B. E., & Dolon, R. (2001). Perceptions of Adult Protective Services workers of the support provided by criminal justice professionals in a case of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 12(3–4), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnie, R. J., & Wallace, R. B. (Eds.) (2003). Elder mistreatment: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blowers, A. N., Davis, B., Shenk, D., Kalaw, K., Smith, M., & Jackson, K. (2012). A multidisciplinary approach to detecting and responding to elder mistreatment: Creating a university-community partnership. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandl, B., Dyer, C. B., Heisler, C. J., Otto, J. M., Stiegel, L. A., & Thomas, R. W. (2006). Enhancing victim safety through collaboration. Care Management Journals, 7(2), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess, A. W. (2000). Violence through a forensic lens (2nd ed., ). King of Prussia, PA: Nursing Spectrum.Google Scholar
  6. Connolly, M. T. (2010). Where elder abuse and the justice system collide: Police power, parens patriae, and 12 recommendations. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 22(1–2), 37–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daly, J. M., & Jogerst, G. (2003). Statute definitions of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 13(4), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels, R. S., Baumhover, L. A., Formby, W. A., & Clark-Daniels, C. L. (1999). Police discretion and elder mistreatment: A nested model of observation, reporting, and satisfaction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong, X. (2013). Elder abuse: research, practice, and health policy. The 2012 GSA Maxwell Pollack Award lecture. The Gerontologist, 54(2), 153–162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Enguidanos, S. M., DeLiema, M., Aguilar, I., Lambrinos, J., & Wilber, K. H. (2014). Multicultural voices: Attitudes of older adults in the United States of America about elder mistreatment. Ageing and Society, 34(05), 877–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk, E., & Hoffman, N. (2014). The role of capacity assessments in elder abuse investigations and guardianships. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 30(4), 851–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gassoumis, Z. D., Navarro, A. E., & Wilber, K. H. (2015). Protecting victims of elder financial exploitation: The role of an elder abuse forensic center in referring victims for conservatorship. Aging & Mental Health, 19(9), 790–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, S. C., & Greene, E. (2013). Assessing knowledge of elder financial abuse: A first step in enhancing prosecutions. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 25(2), 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 188–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisler, C. J. (2012). Elder abuse and the criminal justice system: An uncertain future. Generations, 3, 83–88.Google Scholar
  16. Heisler, C. J., & Stiegel, L. A. (2002). Enhancing the justice system’s response to elder abuse: Discussions and recommendations of the “Improving Prosecution” assessing knowledge of elder financial abuse working group of the national policy summit on elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 14(4), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, M. L., & Johnson, J. L. (2003). Protecting America’s seniors: What local prosecutors are doing to fight elder abuse. American Prosecutors Research Institute: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Navarro, A. E., Gassoumis, Z., & Wilber, K. H. (2009). Los Angeles County Adult Protective Services: Trends in financial abuse reports 2005–2008. University of Southern California: Unpublished issue brief.Google Scholar
  20. Navarro, A. E., Gassoumis, Z. D., & Wilber, K. H. (2013). Holding abusers accountable: An elder abuse forensic center increases criminal prosecution of financial exploitation. The Gerontologist, 53(2), 303–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Navarro, A. E., Wilber, K. H., Yonashiro, J., & Homeier, D. C. (2010). Do we really need another meeting? Lessons from an elder abuse forensic center. The Gerontologist, Practice Concepts, 50(5), 702–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Navarro, A. E., Wysong, J., DeLiema, M., Schwartz, E. L., Nichol, M. B., & Wilber, K. H. (2015). Inside the black box: The case review process of an elder abuse forensic center. The Gerontologist [advanced access].Google Scholar
  23. Payne, B. K. (2002). An integrated understanding of elder abuse and neglect. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(6), 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Payne, B. K., & Berg, B. L. (1999). Perceptions of nursing home workers, police chiefs, and college students regarding crime against the elderly: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Payne, B. K., Berg, B. L., & James, L. (2001a). Attitudes about sanctioning elder abuse offenders among police chiefs, nursing home employees, and students. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(3), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Payne, B. K., Berg, B. L., & Toussaint, J. (2001b). The police response to the criminalization of elder abuse. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24(4), 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn, M. J., & Heisler, C. J. (2002). The legal system: Civil and criminal responses to elder abuse and neglect. Public Policy & Aging Report, 12(2), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quinn, M. J., & Heisler, C. J. (2004). The legal response to elder abuse and neglect. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 14(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reuben, D. B. (2002). Organizational interventions to improve health outcomes of older persons. Medical Care, 40(5), 416–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Schneider, D. C., Mosqueda, L., Falk, E., & Huba, G. J. (2010). Elder abuse forensic centers. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 22(3/4), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teaster, P. B., Nerenberg, L., & Stansbury, K. L. (2003). A national look at elder abuse multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 15(3–4), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiglesworth, A., Mosqueda, L., Burnight, K., Younglove, T., & Jeske, D. (2006). Findings from an elder abuse forensic center. The Gerontologist, 46(2), 277–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilber, K. H., & Reynolds, S. L. (1996). Introducing a framework for defining financial abuse of the elderly. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 8(2), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolf, R. S., & Pillemer, K. (1994). What’s new in elder abuse programming? Four bright ideas. The Gerontologist, 34(1), 126–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood, S., Rakela, B., Liu, P. J., Navarro, A. E., Bernatz, S., Wilber, K. H., et al. (2014). Neuropsychological profiles of victims of financial elder exploitation at the Los Angeles County Elder Abuse Forensic Center. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26(4), 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marguerite DeLiema
    • 1
  • Adria E. Navarro
    • 2
  • Melyssa Moss
    • 3
  • Kathleen H. Wilber
    • 4
  1. 1.Stanford Center on LongevityStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Keck School of Medicine of USC, Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaAlhambraUSA
  3. 3.School of Behavioral and Applied SciencesAzusa Pacific UniversityAzusaUSA
  4. 4.Davis School of GerontologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations