Skip to main content
Log in

What’s in a Name? The Occupational Identity of Conservation and Natural Resource Oriented Law Enforcement Agencies

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 18 April 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

This research explores: (1) the occupational identity of fish and wildlife police agencies and (2) considers an emerging concern that these agencies have widened their work priorities to include more traditional law enforcement. To investigate these issues a content analysis of state level law enforcement agency websites with a fish and wildlife focus is used to better understand how they self-identify (agency name and job titles), their mission statements, the scope of power sworn officers have (limited to special purpose or inclusive of general law enforcement powers), and the educational and training requirements to support their stated agency missions. The findings demonstrate fish and wildlife police agencies are engaged in a scope of work that supports a general law enforcement role. This study demonstrates many fish and wildlife police agencies and their officers appear to be transitioning roles into more generalized law enforcement officers, but this change is not universal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 18 April 2020

    The authors of ���What���s in a Name? The Occupational Identity of Conservation and Natural Resource Oriented Law Enforcement Agencies,���

Notes

  1. Some states had “training sessions” for their fish and wildlife law enforcement personnel, but they lasted 8 weeks or less. Any additional training was classified as an academy if it lasted at least 3 months.

  2. The regions were divided using the criteria stipulated by the U.S. Census Bureau. The Northeast consisted of CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT. Midwest included IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI. South is AR, AL, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, MD, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV. The West contained AK, AZ, CA, CO, ID, HI, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY.

References

  • Benoit, P. J. (1973). From fish and wildlife officer to environmental conservation officer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1(3), 128–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, K. R., & Lanham, C. M. (2013). Occupational Roles and Practices of Kentucky Conservation Officers. Retrieved from http://justicestudies.eku.edu/sites/justicestudies.eku.edu/files/files/Blevins%20SJRP%20Report%202012-2013.pdf

  • California Aquaculture Association (2012). AB 2402 and SB 1148 amended. Retrieved from http://www.caaquaculture.org/2012/09/04/ab-2402-sb-1148-ammended/

  • Carter, T. J. (2004). Force against and by game wardens in citizen encounters. Police Quarterly, 7(4), 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. J. (2006). Police use of discretion: A participant observation study of game wardens. Deviant Behavior, 27(6), 591–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, D. J., & Tynon, J. F. (2000). Triage law enforcement: Societal impacts on national forests in the West. Environmental Management, 26(4), 403–407.

  • Crank, J. P. (2003). Institutional theory of police: A review of the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26, 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, M. S., Shelley, T. O., & Stretesky, P. B. (2013). Camouflage-collar crime: An examination of wildlife crime and characteristics offenders in Florida. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2006). Factors influencing job satisfaction among state conservation officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2007). From wildlife specialist to police generalist? The scope of nonwildlife violations encountered by conservation officers. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2011). Policing natural resources: Issues in a conservation law enforcement agency. Professional Issues in Criminal Justice, 6(3), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2013). Policing the poachers in the United States: A qualitative analysis of game wardens and profiling. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 8, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fritz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, D. (2004). America’s conservation police: Agencies in transition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. (1993). Factors influencing game wardens in their interaction with poachers: The use of discretion. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 21(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. (1994). Bookers and peacemakers: Types of game wardens. Sociological Spectrum, 14(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. (2008a). The game of wardens and poachers. Southern Rural Sociology, 23(2), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. (2008b). Night work and game wardens: The dangers of duty in the dark. The International Journal of Crime, Criminal Justice, and Law, 3(1), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2009). Dire and sequestered meetings: The work of game wardens. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3/4), 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2010). Amateurs and professionals: Analyzing stories and accounts of game wardens about apprehending poachers. The International Journal of Sociological Research, 3(1/2), 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2012). Examining the responses of game wardens to types of poachers. Kentucky Journal of Anthropology and Sociology, 2(1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J., Gramling, R., & Wooddell, G. (1998). The game of poaching: Folk crimes in Southwest Louisiana. Society and Natural Resources, 11(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36(3), 412–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanawalt, B. A. (1988). Men’s games, king’s deer: Poaching in medieval England. Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 18, 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. (1975). Poaching and the game laws on Cannock Chase. In D. Hay, P. Linebaug, J. G. Rule, E. P. Thompson, & C. Winslow (Eds.), Albions fatal tree: Crime & society in eighteenth-century England (pp. 189–253). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, M. J., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Local police departments, 2003. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llanos, M. (2012). California’s Department of Fish and Game gets a name change—and controversy. 3 October 2012, NBC News. Retrieved from http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/03/14200590-californias-department-of-fish-and-game-gets-a-name-change-and-controversy?lite

  • Mastrofski, S., & Uchida, C. (1996). Transforming the police. In B. Hancock & P. Sharp (Eds.), Public policy: Crime and criminal justice (pp. 196–219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and U.S. regional culture. American Psychologist, 48(4), 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, W. M., & Meier, C. A. (2006). “Duck cops”, “game wardens”, and “wildlife enforcement:” Stress among conservation officers. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, R. (2010). Policing in the wild: The game warden’s perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33, 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, R. (2012). Drunk and angry is no way to enjoy the outdoors: An examination of game wardens and the use of force. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, R., & Caudill, J. W. (2013). Weekend warriors and sun block: Game wardens and the use of force. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, R., Caudill, J. W., & Messer, S. (Forthcoming). The dirty south: Exploratory research into game warden fatalities in the United States. Internet Journal of Criminology.

  • Pendleton, M. R. (1996). Crime, criminals and guns in “natural settings”: Exploring the basis for disarming federal rangers. American Journal of Police, 15(4), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, M. R. (1998). Policing the park: Understanding soft enforcement. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(4), 552–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, M. R. (2000). Leisure, crime and cops: Exploring a paradox of our civility. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, G. F., Hanton, E. W., Williams, P. G., Pearson, A. L., Doyle, J. G., & Kwofie, K. (1974). Spatial dynamics of crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renauer, B. C. (2007). Understanding variety in urban community policing. In D. E. Duffee & E. R. Maguire (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 121–150). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, T. O., & Crow, M. S. (2009). The nature and extent of conservation policing: Law enforcement generalists or conservation specialists? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Humane Society of the United States (2014). Protect wildlife. Retrieved from http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/campaigns/wildlife_abuse/

  • Sherblom, J., Keranen, L., & Withers, L. (2002). Tradition, tension, and transformation: A structuration analysis of a game warden service in transition. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 143–162.

  • The United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2011). 2011 national survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisheit, R. A., Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (1995). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America: An overview of the issues. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, K. R. (2013). Name change: California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2 January 2013, LA Times. Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/02/science/la-sci-sn-california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife-20130102

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Patten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patten, R., Crow, M.S. & Shelley, T.O. What’s in a Name? The Occupational Identity of Conservation and Natural Resource Oriented Law Enforcement Agencies. Am J Crim Just 40, 750–764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9286-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9286-y

Keywords

Navigation