Abstract
This research explores: (1) the occupational identity of fish and wildlife police agencies and (2) considers an emerging concern that these agencies have widened their work priorities to include more traditional law enforcement. To investigate these issues a content analysis of state level law enforcement agency websites with a fish and wildlife focus is used to better understand how they self-identify (agency name and job titles), their mission statements, the scope of power sworn officers have (limited to special purpose or inclusive of general law enforcement powers), and the educational and training requirements to support their stated agency missions. The findings demonstrate fish and wildlife police agencies are engaged in a scope of work that supports a general law enforcement role. This study demonstrates many fish and wildlife police agencies and their officers appear to be transitioning roles into more generalized law enforcement officers, but this change is not universal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 April 2020
The authors of ���What���s in a Name? The Occupational Identity of Conservation and Natural Resource Oriented Law Enforcement Agencies,���
Notes
Some states had “training sessions” for their fish and wildlife law enforcement personnel, but they lasted 8 weeks or less. Any additional training was classified as an academy if it lasted at least 3 months.
The regions were divided using the criteria stipulated by the U.S. Census Bureau. The Northeast consisted of CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT. Midwest included IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI. South is AR, AL, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, MD, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV. The West contained AK, AZ, CA, CO, ID, HI, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY.
References
Benoit, P. J. (1973). From fish and wildlife officer to environmental conservation officer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1(3), 128–130.
Blevins, K. R., & Lanham, C. M. (2013). Occupational Roles and Practices of Kentucky Conservation Officers. Retrieved from http://justicestudies.eku.edu/sites/justicestudies.eku.edu/files/files/Blevins%20SJRP%20Report%202012-2013.pdf
California Aquaculture Association (2012). AB 2402 and SB 1148 amended. Retrieved from http://www.caaquaculture.org/2012/09/04/ab-2402-sb-1148-ammended/
Carter, T. J. (2004). Force against and by game wardens in citizen encounters. Police Quarterly, 7(4), 489–508.
Carter, T. J. (2006). Police use of discretion: A participant observation study of game wardens. Deviant Behavior, 27(6), 591–627.
Chavez, D. J., & Tynon, J. F. (2000). Triage law enforcement: Societal impacts on national forests in the West. Environmental Management, 26(4), 403–407.
Crank, J. P. (2003). Institutional theory of police: A review of the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26, 186–207.
Crow, M. S., Shelley, T. O., & Stretesky, P. B. (2013). Camouflage-collar crime: An examination of wildlife crime and characteristics offenders in Florida. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 635–652.
Eliason, S. L. (2006). Factors influencing job satisfaction among state conservation officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29, 6–18.
Eliason, S. L. (2007). From wildlife specialist to police generalist? The scope of nonwildlife violations encountered by conservation officers. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 120–132.
Eliason, S. L. (2011). Policing natural resources: Issues in a conservation law enforcement agency. Professional Issues in Criminal Justice, 6(3), 43–58.
Eliason, S. L. (2013). Policing the poachers in the United States: A qualitative analysis of game wardens and profiling. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 8, 235–247.
Emerson, R. M., Fritz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Falcone, D. (2004). America’s conservation police: Agencies in transition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27, 56–66.
Forsyth, C. J. (1993). Factors influencing game wardens in their interaction with poachers: The use of discretion. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 21(1), 51–56.
Forsyth, C. J. (1994). Bookers and peacemakers: Types of game wardens. Sociological Spectrum, 14(1), 47–63.
Forsyth, C. J. (2008a). The game of wardens and poachers. Southern Rural Sociology, 23(2), 43–53.
Forsyth, C. J. (2008b). Night work and game wardens: The dangers of duty in the dark. The International Journal of Crime, Criminal Justice, and Law, 3(1), 11–15.
Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2009). Dire and sequestered meetings: The work of game wardens. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3/4), 213–223.
Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2010). Amateurs and professionals: Analyzing stories and accounts of game wardens about apprehending poachers. The International Journal of Sociological Research, 3(1/2), 119–128.
Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2012). Examining the responses of game wardens to types of poachers. Kentucky Journal of Anthropology and Sociology, 2(1), 27–36.
Forsyth, C. J., Gramling, R., & Wooddell, G. (1998). The game of poaching: Folk crimes in Southwest Louisiana. Society and Natural Resources, 11(1), 25–38.
Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36(3), 412–427.
Hanawalt, B. A. (1988). Men’s games, king’s deer: Poaching in medieval England. Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 18, 175–193.
Hay, D. (1975). Poaching and the game laws on Cannock Chase. In D. Hay, P. Linebaug, J. G. Rule, E. P. Thompson, & C. Winslow (Eds.), Albions fatal tree: Crime & society in eighteenth-century England (pp. 189–253). New York: Random House.
Hickman, M. J., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Local police departments, 2003. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice.
Llanos, M. (2012). California’s Department of Fish and Game gets a name change—and controversy. 3 October 2012, NBC News. Retrieved from http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/03/14200590-californias-department-of-fish-and-game-gets-a-name-change-and-controversy?lite
Mastrofski, S., & Uchida, C. (1996). Transforming the police. In B. Hancock & P. Sharp (Eds.), Public policy: Crime and criminal justice (pp. 196–219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and U.S. regional culture. American Psychologist, 48(4), 441–449.
Oliver, W. M., & Meier, C. A. (2006). “Duck cops”, “game wardens”, and “wildlife enforcement:” Stress among conservation officers. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2(1), 1–25.
Patten, R. (2010). Policing in the wild: The game warden’s perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33, 132–151.
Patten, R. (2012). Drunk and angry is no way to enjoy the outdoors: An examination of game wardens and the use of force. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(2), 121–132.
Patten, R., & Caudill, J. W. (2013). Weekend warriors and sun block: Game wardens and the use of force. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 410–421.
Patten, R., Caudill, J. W., & Messer, S. (Forthcoming). The dirty south: Exploratory research into game warden fatalities in the United States. Internet Journal of Criminology.
Pendleton, M. R. (1996). Crime, criminals and guns in “natural settings”: Exploring the basis for disarming federal rangers. American Journal of Police, 15(4), 3–25.
Pendleton, M. R. (1998). Policing the park: Understanding soft enforcement. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(4), 552–571.
Pendleton, M. R. (2000). Leisure, crime and cops: Exploring a paradox of our civility. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 111–115.
Pyle, G. F., Hanton, E. W., Williams, P. G., Pearson, A. L., Doyle, J. G., & Kwofie, K. (1974). Spatial dynamics of crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Renauer, B. C. (2007). Understanding variety in urban community policing. In D. E. Duffee & E. R. Maguire (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 121–150). New York: Routledge.
Shelley, T. O., & Crow, M. S. (2009). The nature and extent of conservation policing: Law enforcement generalists or conservation specialists? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 9–27.
The Humane Society of the United States (2014). Protect wildlife. Retrieved from http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/campaigns/wildlife_abuse/
Sherblom, J., Keranen, L., & Withers, L. (2002). Tradition, tension, and transformation: A structuration analysis of a game warden service in transition. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 143–162.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2011). 2011 national survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior.
Weisheit, R. A., Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (1995). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America: An overview of the issues. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Weiss, K. R. (2013). Name change: California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2 January 2013, LA Times. Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/02/science/la-sci-sn-california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife-20130102
Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patten, R., Crow, M.S. & Shelley, T.O. What’s in a Name? The Occupational Identity of Conservation and Natural Resource Oriented Law Enforcement Agencies. Am J Crim Just 40, 750–764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9286-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9286-y