Just Following Orders: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of American Police Officer Use of Force Decisions

Abstract

A substantial amount of research has been conducted to identify the most influential predictors of police use of force decisions. Attempts to summarize this research, however, have so far been primarily limited to narrative literature reviews. While these works are important contributions, they are unable to ensure objectivity during their assessment of the status of the use of force empirical literature. This study improves upon prior research by using the meta-analytic method to identify the key correlates of police decisions to use force. This analysis identifies encounter characteristics as the category of variables that is most strongly correlated with use of force decisions, but also point to a strong localization effect. These findings therefore suggest that the primary focus for future theories of use of force decisions should be on what happens during the encounter, and adequate research syntheses will only be made possible when the number of datasets used to examine use of force decision-making is increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, K. (1999). What we know about police use of force. In K. Adams (Ed.), Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (1999). The force factor: Measuring and assessing police use of force and suspect resistance. In K. Adams (Ed.), Use of force by the police: Overview of national and local data (pp. 45–60). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayley, D., & Mendelsohn, H. (1969). Minorities and the police. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bazely, T., Lersch, K., & Mieczkowski, T. Police use of force: Detectives in an urban police department. Criminal Justice Review, 31, 213–229.

  5. Bittner, E. (1970). Functions of the police in a modern society: A review of background factors, current practices, and possible role models. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brandl, S., Stroshine, M., & Frank, J. (2001). Who are the complaint-prone officers? An examination of the relationship between police officer’ attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens’ complaints about excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 521–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, P. (1994). The continuum of force in community supervision. Federal Probation, 58(4), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford, C., & Burns, R. (1998). Predictors of the police use of force: The application of a continuum perspective in phoenix. Police Quarterly, 1, 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dugan, J., & Breda, D. (1991). Complaints about police officers: A comparison among types and agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engel, R., & Calnon, J. (2004). Examining the influence of drivers’ characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly, 21, 49–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel, R., Sobol, J., & Worden, R. (2000). Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17(2), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleiss, J., & Berlin, J. (2009). Effect sizes for dichotomous data. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 237–253). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedrich, R. (1980). Police use of force: Individuals, situations, and organizations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fyfe, J. (1982). Blind justice: Police shootings in Memphis. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 73, 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fyfe, J., & Walker, J. (1990). Garner plus five years: An examination of Supreme Court intervention into police discretion and legislative prerogatives. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garner, J., Buchanan, J., Schade, T., & Hepburn, J. (1996). Understanding the use of force by and against the police. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Garner, J., Maxwell, C., & Heraux, C. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 705–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garner, J., Schade, T., Hepburn, J., & Buchanan, J. (1995). Measuring the continuum of force use by and against the police. Criminal Justice Review, 20, 146–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gill, J., & Pasquale-Styles, M. (2009). Firearm deaths by law enforcement. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54, 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gottfredson, M., & Gottfredson, D. (1980). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanushek, E., & Jackson, J. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hickman, M., Piquero, A., & Garner, J. (2008). Toward a national estimate of police use of nonlethal force. Criminology & Public Policy, 7(4), 563–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson, R. (2011). Suspect mental disorder and police use of force. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 38, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaminski, R., DiGiovanni, C., & Downs, R. (2004). The use of force between the police and persons with impaired judgment. Police Quarterly, 7, 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klahm, C., Frank, J., & Brown, R. (2011). Police use of force: Tales from another city. Journal of Crime & Justice, 34, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klahm, C., & Tillyer, R. (2010). Understanding police use of force: A review of the evidence. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 214–239.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klinger, D. (1995). The micro-structure of nonlethal force: Baseline data from an observational study. Criminal Justice Review, 20(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klinger, D. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kochel, T., Wilson, D., & Mastrofski, S. (2011). Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49(2), 473–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kop, N., & Euwema, M. (2001). Occupational stress and the use of force by Dutch police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawton, B. (2007). Levels of nonlethal force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leinfelt, F. (2005). Predicting use of non-lethal force in a mid-size police department: A longitudinal analysis of the influence of subject and situational variables. The Police Journal, 78, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lersch, K., & Mieczowski, T. (1996). Who are the problem-prone officers? An analysis of citizen complaints. American Journal of Police, 15, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lester, D. (1982). Perceived stress in police officers and belief in locus of control. The Journal of General Psychology, 107, 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lundman, R. (1996). Demeanor and arrest: Additional evidence from previously unpublished data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lytle, D. (2013). Decision making in criminal justice revisited: Toward a general theory of criminal justice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Oh.

  41. Makarios, M., & Pratt, T. (2012). The effectiveness of policies and programs that attempt to reduce firearm violence: A meta-analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 58(2), 222–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCluskey, J., & Terrill, W. (2005). Departmental and citizen complaints as predictors of police coercion. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 28, 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McCluskey, J., Terrill, W., & Paoline, E. (2005). Peer group aggressiveness and the use of coercion in police-suspect encounters. Police Practice & Research, 6, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Morabito, E., & Doerner, B. (1997). Police use of less-than-lethal force: Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) spray. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 20, 680–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paoline, E., & Terrill, W. (2004). Women police officers and the use of coercion. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Paoline, E., & Terrill, W. (2007). Police education, experience, and the use of force. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 34(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pratt, T. (2002). Meta-analysis and its discontents: Treatment destruction techniques revisited. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson & Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime & Justice, 32, 373–450.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reiss, A. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reiss, A., & Roth, J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding and preventing violence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Riksheim, E., & Chermak, S. (1993). Causes of police behavior revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(4), 353–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rosenbaum, D., Schuck, A., Costello, S., Hawkins, D., & Ring, M. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “File drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rydberg, J., & Terrill, W. (2010). The effect of higher education on police behavior. Police Quarterly, 13, 92–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schuck, A. (2004). The masking of racial and ethnic disparity in police use of physical force: The effects of gender and custody status. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schuck, A., & Rabe-Hemp, C. (2007). Women police. Women & Criminal Justice, 16, 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sherman, L. (1980). Causes of police behavior: The current state of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17(1), 69–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Slovak, J. (1986). Styles of urban policing. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Smith, D. (1986). The Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior. In A. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sparger, J., & Giacopassi, D. (1992). Memphis revisited: a reexamination of police shootings after the “garner” decision. Justice Quarterly, 9, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sun, I., & Payne, B. (2004). Racial difference in resolving conflicts: A comparison between black and white police officers. Crime & Delinquency, 50(4), 516–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Terrill, W. (2005). Police use of force: A transactional approach. Justice Quarterly, 22, 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Terrill, W., Leinfelt, F., & Kwak, D. (2008). Examining police use of force: A smaller agency perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 31, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 215–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Terrill, W., Paoline, E., & Manning, P. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41, 1003–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(3), 291–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thompson, B., & Lee, J. (2004). Who care if police become violent? Explaining approval of police use of force using a national sample. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Werthman, C., & Piliavin, I. (1967). Gang Members and the Police. In D. Bordua (Ed.), The police: Six sociological essays. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wilson, J. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Colin Bolger.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Use of force studies included in the meta-analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolger, P.C. Just Following Orders: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of American Police Officer Use of Force Decisions. Am J Crim Just 40, 466–492 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9278-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Police
  • Meta-analysis
  • Decision-making
  • Force