Abstract
The U.S. criminal justice system is overwhelmed with individuals affected by substance use and psychiatric disorders often co-morbid with criminal behavior. Locally, an evaluation of St. Louis downtown municipal ordinance violators found that 49 % of offenders reported mental health problems, 30 % reported alcohol-related problems, 86 % had a history of prior arrests and 71 % had failed to appear in the St. Louis City Municipal Court within the previous 2 years (Downtown St. Louis Community Court Evaluation Report, St. Louis, MO). These compounded conditions and their corresponding treatment needs are costly and complicate correctional rehabilitation efforts. Drug courts have emerged as alternative ‘therapeutic jurisprudence’ avenues designed to reduce drug use and associated individual risk behaviors. Unfortunately, there are few evidence-based measures available for rapid, onsite evaluation of an individuals’ potential for success with drug court. A new assessment tool, the Courtroom Behavior Check List (CRBCL), was developed to measure behavioral compliance in court as a predictor of future behavior, as we believed that behavior in court would predict future criminal behavior. We found scores on the CRBCL declined (e.g., improved) among the 127 women interviewed from baseline through the 8-month follow-up, and that a poorer score predicted re-arrest for a criminal offense (OR = 2.84; 95 % CI 1.20–6.69). Based upon these findings, the CRBCL may be a useful tool to measure the likelihood of re-offending among women in drug court. Policy implications and directions for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. F. (2001). What to do about “much ado” about drug courts? The International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 469–475.
Barnes, J. C., Miller, J. M., Miller, H. V., & Gibson, C. (2008). Juvenile drug court program admission, demeanor, and cherry-picking: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 166–176.
Bondy, S., & Rehm, J. (1998). The interplay of drinking patterns and other determinants of health. Drug and Alcohol Review, 17, 399–412.
Cottler, L. B. (2003). Computerized substance abuse module (SAM). St. Louis: Washington University School of Medicine.
Cunningham, A. L., Sobel, L., Sobell, M., Agrawal, S., & Toneatto, T. (1993). Barriers to treatment: Why alcohol and drug abusers delay or never seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 8, 347–353.
DuBois, J. M., O’Leary, C. C., & Cottler, L. B. (2009). The attitudes of females in Drug Court toward additional safeguards in HIV prevention research. Prev Sci, 10(4), 345–352.
Fielding, J. E., Tye, G., Ogawa, P. L., Imam, I. J., & Long, A. M. (2002). Los Angeles County drug court programs: Initial results. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 217–224.
Fischer, M., Geiger, B., & Hughes, M. E. (2007). Female recidivists speak about their experience in drug court while engaging in appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 703–722.
Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the Drug court Black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27–72.
Green, B., Miranda, J., Daroowalla, A., & Siddique, J. (2005). Mental health and programming needs of incarcerated women with trauma. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 133–151.
Guerino, P., Harrison, P. M., & Sabol, W. J. (December 15, 2011). Prisoners in 2010 (Revised). Published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, #NCJ 236096.
Harrison, L., & Backenheimer, M. (1998). Evolving insights into the drug-crime nexus. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1763–1777.
Hora, P. F. (2002). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: Uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1469–1488.
Horton, J., Compton, W., & Cottler, L. B. (2000). Reliability of substance use disorders among African Americans and Caucasians. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(3), 203–209.
Huddleston, W., & Marlowe, D. B. (2011). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Drug Court Institute.
Johnson, J. E., O’Leary, C. C., Striley, C. W., Ben, A. A., Bradford, S., & Cottler, L. B. (2011). Effects of major depression on crack use and arrests among women in drug court. Addiction, 106(7), 1279–1286.
Leshner, A. (1998). Gender matters in drug abuse research. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.
Needle, R., Fisher, D. G., Weatherby, N., Chitwood, D., Brown, B., Cesari, H., et al. (1995). Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 242–250.
Peters, R. H., Strozier, A. L., Murrin, M. R., & Kearns, W. D. (1997). Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 339–349.
Robins, L. N., & Marcus, S. C. (1987). The diagnostic screening procedure writer: A tool to develop individualized screening procedures. Medical Care, 25, S106–S122.
Ruger, J. P., Ben Abdallah, A., & Cottler, L. (2010). Costs of HIV prevention among out-of-treatment drug-using women: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Public Health Reports, 125, 83–94.
Sabol, W. J., & West, H. C. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Office of Justice Program Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2232
Shacham, E., & Cottler, L. B. (2010). Sexual risk behaviors: Prevalence and reliability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1331–1341.
Steele, J. D., & Lawrie, S. M. (2004). Segregation of cognitive and emotional function in the prefrontal cortex: A stereotactic meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 21, 868–875.
Volkow, N. D. (2010). Drugs, brains, and behavior—the science of addiction. Retrieved from http://www.drugabuse.gov/scienceofaddiction/
Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
Young, D., & Belenko, S. (2002). Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(1), 297–328.
Acknowledgement
Support for the Sisters Treatment Options for Prevention Study was provided by the National Institute of Nursing Research NR000180 (PI: Linda Cottler). Support for the present analyses was provided by R01 DA027951 (PI: Linda Cottler). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
The authors would also like to acknowledge our many community partners and our participants. This project was convened through a partnership with James Sullivan, serving as Administrative Judge of the St. Louis Municipal Court.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reingle, J.M., Striley, C.W., Small, E. et al. Can Courtroom Behavior Predict Recidivism? An Assessment of the Courtroom Behavior Check List for Women Presenting in Drug Court. Am J Crim Just 38, 520–534 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9190-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9190-2