Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 348–368 | Cite as

Long-Term Effects of Adolescent Negative Self-Feelings on Adult Deviance: Moderated by Neighborhood Disadvantage, Mediated by Expectations

  • Heili Pals
  • Howard B. Kaplan
Article

Abstract

This paper tests two competing hypotheses, derived from general strain and middle class measuring rod theories, regarding the moderating effects of neighborhood disadvantage on the long-term relationship between adolescent negative self-feelings and adult deviance. The results from longitudinal data support the middle class measuring rod theory: adolescent negative self-feelings increase adult deviance only in middle status neighborhoods and not in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods. Furthermore, this effect in middle status neighborhoods is mediated by low expectations of the future in while still in adolescence. Our findings show the importance of studying the combination of both the social psychological and the contextual influences on deviance.

Keywords

Transition to adulthood General deviance Neighborhood disadvantage Negative self-feelings Expectations of future 

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (1999). A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(2), 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.Google Scholar
  5. Agnew, R. (2009). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & C. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Agnew, R., Cullen, F., Jr., Burton, V. S., Evans, D. T., & Dunaway, G. R. (1996). A new test of classic strain theory. Justice Quarterly, 13, 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(4), 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  9. Baron, S. W. (2004). General strain, street youth and crime: a test of Agnew's revised theory. Criminology, 42(2), 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Soc Psychol, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard, T. (1990). Angry aggression among the "Truly Disadvantaged". Criminology, 28, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. J Heal Soc Behav, 42(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of accessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Burton, V. S., Jr., & Cullen, F. T. (1992). The empirical status of strain theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15(2), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton, V. S., Jr., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., & Dunaway, R. G. (1994). Reconsidering strain theory. J Quant Criminol, 10(3), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burton, V. S., Jr., & Dunaway, G. R. (1994). Strain, relative deprivation, and middle class delinquency. In G. Barak (Ed.), Varieties of criminology: Readings from a dynamic discipline. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Chung, H. L., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders. Dev Psychol, 42(2), 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. DeLisi, M. (2011). Editorial: how general is general strain theory? Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eitle, D., & Eitle, T. M. (2003). Segregation and school violence. Social Forces, 82(2), 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct Equ Model, 6(1), 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fang, J., Madhavan, S., Bosworth, W., & Alderman, M. H. (1998). Residential segregation and mortality in New York City. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 497–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedrichs, J., & Blasius, J. (2003). Social norms in distressed neighborhoods: testing the Wilson hypothesis. Hous Stud, 18(6), 807–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. T. (1930). 500 criminal careers. New York: AA Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hagan, J., & Foster, H. (2003). S/He's a rebel: toward a sequential stress theory of delinquency and gendered pathways to disadvantage in emerging adulthood. Social Forces, 82(1), 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haynie, D., Silver, E., & Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. J Quant Criminol, 22(2), 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffmann, J. P. (2002). A contextual analysis of differential association, social control, and strain theories of delinquency. Social Forces, 81(3), 753–785.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffman, J. P., & Su, S. S. (1997). The conditional effects of stress on delinquency and drug use: a strain theory assessment of sex differences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 46–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jang, S. J., & Rhodes, J. R. (2012). General strain and non-strain theories: a study of crime in emerging adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn (Ed.), Inner-city poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jessor, R., Donovan, J. E., & Costa, F. M. (1991). Beyond adolescence: Problem behavior and young adult behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, H. B. (1976). Self-attitudes and deviant response. Social Forces, 54(4), 788–801.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, H. B. (1980). Deviant behavior in defense of self. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, H. B., & Lin, C.-H. (2000). Deviant identity as a moderator of the relation between negative self-feelings and deviant behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 20(2), 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan, H. B., & Lin, C.-H. (2005). Deviant identity, negative self-feelings, and decreases in deviant behavior: The moderating influence of conventional social bonding. Psychology Crime & Law, 11(3), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan, D. S., Liu, R. X., & Kaplan, H. B. (2005). School related stress in early adolescence and academic performance three years later: the conditional influence of self expectations. Soc Psychol Educ, 8(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaplan, H. B., Martin, S. S., & Johnson, R. J. (1986). Self-rejection and the explanation of deviance: Specification of the structure among latent constructs. Am J Sociol, 92(2), 384–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaufman, J. (2005). Explaining the race/ethnicity-violence relationship: neighborhood context and social psychological processes. Justice Quarterly, 22, 224–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirschenman, J., & Neckerman, K. M. (1991). 'We'd love to hire them, but…': The meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  43. Kramer, R. C. (2000). Poverty, inequality, and youth violence. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 567, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75, 619–650.Google Scholar
  45. Kumpulainen, K. (2000). Psychiatric symptoms and deviance in early adolescence predict heavy alcohol use 3 years later. Addiction, 95(12), 1847–1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lambert, S. F., Brown, T. L., Phillips, C. M., & Ialongo, N. S. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and substance use among urban African American adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lamm, H., Schmidt, R. W., & Trommsdorff, G. (1976). Sex and social class as determinants of future orientation (time perspective) in adolescents. J Personal Soc Psychol, 34(3), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, M. R. (2000). Community cohesion and violent predatory victimization: a theoretical extension and cross-national test of opportunity theory. Social Forces, 79(2), 683–706.Google Scholar
  49. Lepore, S. J. (1995). Measurement of chronic stressors. In S. Cohen, R. C. Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Liu, R. X., & Kaplan, H. B. (2004). Role stress and aggression among young adults: the moderating influences of gender and adolescent aggression. Soc Psychol Q, 67(1), 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Lynam, D. R., Capsi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Wikström, P.-O. H., Loeber, R., & Novak, S. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: the effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. J Abnorm Psychol, 109, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Massey, D., & Shibuya, K. (1995). Unraveling the tangle of pathology: the effect of spatially concentrated joblessness on the well-being of African American. Soc Sci Res, 24, 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: how much does it matter? Science, 243(4897), 1441–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mazerolle, P., Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., & Payne, G. L. (2000). Strain, anger, and delinquent adaptations: specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(2), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Merton, R. K. (1968). Anomie, anomia, and social interaction: Contexts of deviant behavior. In M. Clinard (Ed.), Anomie and deviant behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus users guide (5th ed.). LA, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  58. Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished Technical Report.Google Scholar
  59. Ostrowsky, M. K., & Messner, S. F. (2005). Explaining crime for a young adult population: an application of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(5), 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Passas, N. (1997). Anomie, reference groups, and relative deprivation. In N. Passas & R. Agnew (Eds.), The future of anomie theory. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Paternoster, R., & Mazerolle, P. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: a replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(3), 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Robert, S. A. (1998). Community-level socioeconomic status effects on adult health. J Heal Soc Behav, 39(1), 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Revised ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: the salience of adult social bonds. Am Sociol Rev, 55(5), 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annu Rev Sociol, 18(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing "neighborhood effects": social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol, 28(1), 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sigfusdottir, I. D., Kristjansson, A. L., & Agnew, R. (2012). A comparative analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turner, J. R., & Avison, W. R. (1992). Innovations in the measurement of life stress: crisis theory and the significance of event resolution. J Heal Soc Behav, 33, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Welzenis, I. (1997). The self-concept of societally vulnerable and delinquent boys within the context of school and leisure activities. J Adolesc, 20(6), 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vazsonyi, A. T., Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2006). Does the effect of impulsivity on delinquency vary by level of neighborhood disadvantage? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(4), 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Sociology DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations