American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 356–377 | Cite as

The Moderation Effects of Family Structure and Low Self-Control

Article

Abstract

Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) theory of low self-control (LSC) asserts the etiology of LSC lies in the ability of parents to correctly control their children. These parental behaviors are crucial to understanding how LSC may or may not be transmitted from parents to children. Little research has explored the potential moderating effects of family structure regarding parenting, LSC, and delinquency. Multi-group structural equation modeling is used with data from the National Evaluation of the Teens, Crime, and the Community/Community Works (TCC/CW) program (n = 1,409) to assess these relationships. Results show LSC mediates the relationship between family structure and delinquency. Additionally, the relationships between parenting, LSC, and delinquency are invariant for children from intact or broken homes. It is suggested that future research explore the origins of parental efficacy and LSC beyond family structure while considering self-control as a multidimensional concept. Policy recommendations are also discussed.

Keywords

Self-control Parenting Family structure Juvenile delinquency Structural equation modeling 

References

  1. Apel, R., & Kaukinen, C. (2008). On the relationship between family structure and antisocial behavior: parental cohabitation and blended households. Criminology, 46(1), 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS 18 users guide. AMOS Development Corporation. Retrieved on February 3, 2011 http://www.wright.edu/cats/docs/pasw/pasw18/1.pdf.
  4. Arneklev, B. J., Cochran, J. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s ‘low self-control’ stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(1), 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arneklev, B. J., Elis, L., & Medlicott, S. (2006). Testing the general theory of crime: comparing the effects of ‘imprudent behavior’ and an attitudinal indicator of ‘low self-control’. Western Criminology Review, 7(3), 41–55.Google Scholar
  6. Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. (1999). Evaluating the dimensionality and invariance of ‘low self-control’. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(3), 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(3), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaver, K. M., Shutt, J. E., Boutwell, B. B., Ratchford, M., Roberts, K., & Barnes, J. C. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on levels of self-control and delinquent peer affiliation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackwell, B. S., & Piquero, A. R. (2005). On the relationships between gender, power control, self-control, and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boutwell, B. B., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). The role of broken homes in the development of self-control: a propensity score matching approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brannigan, A., Gemmell, W., Pevalin, D. J., & Wade, T. J. (2002). Self-control and social control in childhood misconduct and aggression: the role of family structure, hyperactivity, and hostile parenting. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 119–142.Google Scholar
  12. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cavanagh, S. E., & Huston, A. C. (2006). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 85(1), 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapple, C. L., & Hope, T. L. (2003). An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of gang and dating violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 18(6), 671–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapple, C. L., Vaske, J., & Hope, T. L. (2010). Sex differences in the causes of self-control: an examination of mediation, moderation, and gendered etiologies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1122–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., Sellers, C. S., Wilkerson, W., & Chamlin, M. B. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: an empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 19(3), 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curry, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 12(3), 385–397.Google Scholar
  18. Dekeseredy, W., Alvi, S., & Schwartz, M. (2006). An economic exclusion/male peer support model looks at “wedfare” and woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 14(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esbensen, F.-A. (2009). Final report: Evaluation of the teens, crime, and the community and community works program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Feldman, S. S., & Weinberger, D. A. (1994). Self-restraint as a mediator of family influences on boys’ delinquent behavior: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 65(1), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gadd, D., & Farrall, S. (2004). Criminal careers, desistance and subjectivity: interpreting men’s narratives of change. Theoretical Criminology, 8(2), 123–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Higgins, G. E. (2003). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. S. (1998). Parental management and self-control: an empirical test of gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(1), 40–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson, C. L., Sullivan, C. J., Jones, S., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). ‘Does it take a village?’ Assessing neighborhood influences on children’s self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(1), 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Grasmick, H., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: a test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Higgins, G. E. (2002). General theory of crime and deviance: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25(2), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Higgins, G. E., & Boyd, R. J. (2008). Low self-control and deviance: examining the moderation of social support from parents. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 388–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hope, T. L., Grasmick, H. G., & Pointon, L. J. (2003). The family in Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: structure, parenting, and self-control. Sociological Focus, 36(4), 291–311.Google Scholar
  31. Howell, J. C., & Hawkins, J. D. (1998). Prevention of youth violence. Crime and Justice, 24, 263–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kierkus, C. A., & Baer, D. (2003). Does the relationship between family structure and delinquency vary according to circumstances? An investigation of interaction effects. Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 45(4), 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kierkus, C. A., & Hewitt, J. D. (2009). The contextual nature of the family structure/delinquency relationship. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Latimore, T. L., Tittle, C. R., & Grasmick, H. G. (2006). Childrearing, self-control, and crime: additional evidence. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3), 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mandara, J., & Murray, C. B. (2000). Effects of parental marital status, income, and family functioning on African American adolescent self-esteem. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(3), 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCarthy, B., Hagan, J., & Woodward, T. S. (1999). In the company of women: structure and agency in a revised power-control theory of gender and delinquency. Criminology, 37(4), 761–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melde, C., Esbensen, F.-A., & Tusinski, K. (2006). Addressing program fidelity using onsite observations and program provider descriptions of program delivery. Evaluation Review, 30(6), 714–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meldrum, R. C. (2008). Beyond parenting: An examination of the etiology of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2).Google Scholar
  40. Nofziger, S. (2008). The ‘cause’ of low self-control: the influence of maternal self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne, B. K., Higgins, G. E., & Blackwell, B. (2010). Exploring the link between self-control and partner violence: bad parenting or general criminals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1015–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: a test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 298–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phythian, K., Keane, C., & Krull, C. (2008). Family structure and parental behavior: identifying the sources of adolescent self-control. Western Criminology Review, 9(2), 73–87.Google Scholar
  44. Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al’.s self-control scale. Criminology, 38(3), 897–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polakowski, M. (1994). Linking self- and social control with deviance: illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(1), 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pratt, T. C., Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: a longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(3), 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rebellon, C. J., Straus, M. A., & Medeiros, R. (2008). Self-control in global perspective: an empirical assessment of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory within and across 32 national settings. European Journal of Criminology, 5(3), 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosen, L. (1985). Family and delinquency: structure or function? Criminology, 23(3), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Slocum, L. A., Taylor, T. J., Brick, B. T., & Esbensen, F.-A. (2010). Neighborhood structural characteristics, individual-level attitudes, and youth’s crime reporting intentions. Criminology, 48(4), 1063–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner, M. G., Livecchi, C. M., Beaver, K. M., & Booth, J. (2011). Moving beyond the socialization hypothesis: the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on the development of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(6), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turner, M. G., Piquero, A. R., & Pratt, T. C. (2005). The school context as a source of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(4), 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Agnew, R. (2006). Why is ‘bad’ parenting criminogenic? implications from rival theories. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(3), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vazsonyi, A. T., & Belliston, L. M. (2007). The family – > low self-control – > deviance: a cross-cultural and cross-national test of self-control theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(4), 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vazsonyi, A. T., & Klanjsek, R. (2008). A test of self-control theory across different socioeconomic strata. Justice Quarterly, 25(1), 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade, T. J., & Brannigan, A. (1998). The genesis of adolescent risk-taking: pathways through family, school, and peers. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waller, M. R., & Swisher, R. (2006). Fathers’ risk factors in fragile families: implications for “healthy” relationships and father involvement. Social Problems, 53(3), 392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watkins, A. M., & Melde, C. (2007). The effect of self-control on unit and item nonresponse in an adolescent sample. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(3), 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiggins, R. D., & Sacker, A. (2002). Strategies for handling missing data in SEM: A user’s perspective. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and Latent structure models (pp. 105–120). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Winfree, L. T., Taylor, T. J., He, N., & Esbensen, F.-A. (2006). Self-control and variability over time: Multivariate results using a 5-year, multisite panel of youths. Crime & Delinquency, 52(2), 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations