American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 580–601 | Cite as

Revisiting Licensed Handgun Carrying: Personal Protection or Interpersonal Liability?

Article

Abstract

No debate is more sensitive or polemical than the question of “gun rights” in the U.S., and licensing private citizens to carry concealed handguns is the most controversial “right” of all. The morally charged nature of this controversy is reflected in the disparate results reported by various researchers who analyze the effects of these laws, and also by the especially intense methodological scrutiny that follows published research. A National Science Academy review of existing gun policy research issues methodological recommendations which may help resolve scientifically the question of whether or how “right to carry” licensing effects rates of lethal firearm violence. Similar efforts have been published previously, but this study improves upon those earlier efforts by increasing the sample cross-section, by further refining the model specification, and by distinguishing conceptually “shall issue” RTC laws from “may issue” RTC laws. The results provisionally suggest that the former increases homicide rates whereas the latter decreases them.

Keywords

Gun-Laws Homicide Gun-Crime 

References

  1. Alaniz, M. L., Cartmill, R. S., & Parker, R. N. (1998). Immigrants and violence: The importance of neighborhood context. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 20(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almgren, G., Guest, A., Immerwahr, G., & Spittel, M. (1998). Joblessness, family disruption, and violent death in Chicago, 1979–1990. Social Forces, 76(4), 1465–1494.Google Scholar
  3. Ayers, L. (2003). The latest misfires in support of the “more guns, less crime” hypothesis. Stanford Law Review, 55, 1371–1398.Google Scholar
  4. Ayers, L., & Donohue, J. J. (2003). Shooting down the “more guns, less crime” hypothesis. Stanford Law Review, 55, 1193.Google Scholar
  5. Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research. Davis, California: Thompson: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, W. C. (1984). Poverty, inequality and city homicide rates: Some not so unexpected results. Criminology, 22, 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, D. A., & Nagin, D. S. (1998). Do right to carry laws deter violent crime? The Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao, L., Adams, A., & Jensen, V. (1997). A test of the Black subculture of violence thesis: A research note. Criminology, 35(2), 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Census of Retail Trade (1977–2002). Online. Available: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/usgd/ecococensus/html Accessed 3/10/03
  10. Cook, P., & Ludwig, J. (2003). Evaluating gun policy: Effects on crime and violence. Washington DC: Brunswick Institution.Google Scholar
  11. Covington, J. (1999). African American communities and violent crime: The construction of race differences. Sociological Focus, 32(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  12. Crutchfield, R. D. (1989). Stratification and violent crime. Social Forces, 68(2), 489–512.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, J., & Lizotte, A. J. (1987). Gun ownership and the “Southern Sub-Culture of Violence”. The American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duggan, M. (2001). More guns, more crime. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 1086–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, D. S., Sherman, D., & Martinez, R. (1997). Crime and restructuring of the U.S. economy. Social Forces, 75(3), 769–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harer, M. D., & Steffensmeier, J. L. (1992). The differing effects of economic inequality on black and white rates of violence. Social Forces, 70(4), 1035–1054.Google Scholar
  17. Hemenway, D. (1997). The myth of millions of annual self-defense gun uses: A case study of overestimates of rare events. Chance, 10(3), 6–10.Google Scholar
  18. Kleck, G. (1991). Point blank: Guns and violence in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting guns: Firearms and their control. New York: Aldine DeGruter.Google Scholar
  20. Kleck, G., & Gertz, M. (1995). Armed resistance to crime: The prevalence and nature of self-defense with a gun. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 150–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 619–650.Google Scholar
  22. Krivo, L. J., Peterson, R. D., Rizzo, H., & Reynolds, J. R. (1998). Race, segregation and the concentration of disadvantage: 1980–1990. Social Problems, 45(1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. La Valle, J. (2007). Rebuilding at gunpoint: A city-level re-estimation of the Brady law and RTC laws in the wake of hurricane Katrina. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(4), 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. La Valle, J. (2008). Guns and homicide: Is the instrument-focused approach to deterrence efficacious? Justice Policy Journal, 5(2), 1–30. Exclusively [on-line] available: http://cjcj.org/justice_policy_journal.Google Scholar
  25. La Valle, J. (2010). Re-estimating gun policy effects according to a national academy of science report: Were previous reports of failure pre-mature? Journal of Crime and Justice, 33(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lott, J. R. (2000). More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lott, J. R., & Mustard, D. (1997). Crime, deterrence, and the right to carry concealed handguns. The Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ludwig, J. (1998). Concealed gun carrying law and violent crime: Evidence from state panel data. International Review of law and Economics, 18(2), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maltz, M., & Targonski, J. (2002). A note on the use of county-level UCR data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. (1995). The impact of enhanced prison terms on felonies committed with handguns. Criminology, 33, 247–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. (2008). Can and should criminology research influence policy? Suggestions for Time-Series Cross-Section Studies. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(3), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDowall, D. C., Loftin, C., & Wiersema, B. (1995). Easing concealed firearms laws: Effects on homicide in three states. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDowall, D. C., Loftin, C., & Wiersema, B. (1998). Estimates of the frequency of firearms self-defense from the redesigned National Crime and Victimization Survey. Violence Research group discussion, paper 20Google Scholar
  34. McPhedran, S., & Baker, J. (2008). The Impact of Australia’s 1996 firearms legislation: A research review with emphasis on data selection, methodological issues, and statistical outcomes. Justice Policy Journal, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  35. Messner, S. F. (1983). Regional and racial effects on the urban homicide rate: The subculture of violence revisited. The American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 997–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moody, C. (2001). Testing the effects of concealed weapons laws: Specification errors and robustness. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(3), 799–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson, D. E., & Maltz, M. D. (2001). Right-to-carry concealed weapons laws and homicide in large U.S. counties: The effect on weapons types, victim characteristics, and victim offender relationships. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, R. N. (1995). Alcohol & homicide: A deadly combination of two American traditions. New York: State University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Parker, R. N., & Smith, M. D. (1979). Deterrence, poverty & types of homicide. The American Journal of Sociology, 85, 614–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plassman, F., & Tideman, T. N. (2001). Does the right to carry concealed handguns deter countable crimes? Only a count analysis can say. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), 771–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plassman, F., & Whitley, J. E. (2003). Comments: Confirming more guns, less crime. Stanford Law Review, 55, 1313–1369.Google Scholar
  42. Tartaro, C., & Levy, M. P. (2007). Density, inmate assaults, and direct supervision in jails. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(4), 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turk, A. (1982). Political criminality: The defiance and defense of authority. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Uniform Crime Reports. U.S. Government (1970–2005). U.S Census Bureau. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  45. Vernick, J. S., & Hepburn, L. M. (2003). State and federal gun laws, 1970–1999. In J. Ludwig & P. J. Cook (Eds.), Evaluating gun policy: Effects on crime and violence. Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wellford, C., Pepper, J., & Petrie, C. (2005). Firearms and violence: A critical review. Washington DC: National Science Academies Press.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, K. R. (1984). Economic sources of homicide: Re-estimating the effects of poverty and inequality. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright, J., Rossi, P. H., & Daly, K. (1983). Under the gun: Weapons, crime and violence in America. Hawthorn: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  49. Yaffee, R. (2000). Time series analysis and forecasting. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coker CollegeHartsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of GLIAMurray State UniversityMurrayUSA

Personalised recommendations