American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 602–629 | Cite as

Sentencing Juvenile Offenders to Life in Prison: The Political Sociology of Juvenile Punishment

Article

Abstract

Sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison is the most severe criminal penalty available, yet we know little about the factors that produce jurisdictional differences in the use of such sanctions. Political explanations emphasize conservative values and the strength of more conservative political parties. Threat accounts suggest that this sentence will be more likely in jurisdictions with larger minority populations. After controlling for many explanations using count models, the results show that larger numbers of juvenile life sentences are handed out in more politically conservative states with a stronger Republican Party. Findings also show that racial politics is a factor in juvenile life sentences. Those jurisdictions that have the most blacks and have judicial elections sentence the most juveniles to life terms. By highlighting the explanatory power of public ideologies, these findings support political explanations for the harshest criminal punishment directed towards juveniles.

Keywords

Juvenile justice Juvenile incarceration Politics of punishment Life sentences 

References

  1. Armstrong, G., & Rodriguez, N. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, V. (2006). The politics of punishment: building a state governance theory of American imprisonment variation. Punishment & Society, 8(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, L. (2003). Judicial Elections and Judicial Independence: The Voter’s Perspective. 64 Ohio St. L.J. 13.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  6. Beckett, K., & Western, B. (2001). Governing social marginality: Welfare, Incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment & Society, 3(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science, 42(January), 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop, D. (2005). The Role of Race and Ethnicity in Juvenile Justice Processing. In D. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American Juvenile Justice (pp. 23–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, J. R., & Blau, P. (1982). Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review 47, 114–128.Google Scholar
  11. Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brace, P., & Boyea, B. D. (2008). State public opinion, the death penalty, and the practice of electing judges. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brace, P., & Hall, M. G. (1997). The interplay of preferences, case facts, context, and rules in the politics of judicial choice. Journal of Politics, 59, 1206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bridges, G., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: extending Blumer’s theory of group position in a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Britt, C. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks, R. R. W., & Raphael, S. (2003). Life terms pr death sentences: the uneasy relationship between judicial elections and capital punishment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology., 92, 609–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burbank S. B., & Friedman, B. (2002). Judicial independence at the crossroads: An interdisciplinary approach.Google Scholar
  19. Caldeira, G. A., & Cowart, A. T. (1980). Budgets, institutions, and change: criminal justice policy in America. American Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 413–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. A. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Carmichael, J. T. (2010). Sentencing disparities for juvenile offenders sentenced to adult prisons: an individual and contextual analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carmichael, J. T. (2011). Punishing juvenile offenders as adults: An analysis of the social and political determinants of juvenile prison admissions across U.S. States. Sociological Focus Google Scholar
  23. Carmichael, J. T. (2005). The determinants of jail admission rates across large U.S. cities: an analysis of racial and ethnic threat theory. Social Science Research, 34, 538–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chambliss, W. J., & Seidman, R. (1980). Law, order, and power. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  25. Cook, B. B. (1977). Public opinion and federal judicial policy. Annual Journal of Political Science, 21, 567–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. D’Alessio, S. J., & Stolzenburg, L. (1995). The impact of sentencing guidelines on jail incarceration in Minnesota. Criminology, 33, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davey, J. D. (1998). The politics of prison expansion: Winning elections by waging war on crime. Praeger.Google Scholar
  28. Feeley, M. (2003). Crime, social order and the rise of neo-conservative politics. Theoretical Criminology, 7, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldmeyer, B., & Ulmer, J. T. (2010). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar
  30. Fossett, M., & South, S. J. (1983). The measurement of intergroup income inequality: a conceptual review.Social Forces 61, 855–871.Google Scholar
  31. Fritsch, E. J., Caeti, T. J., & Hemmens, C. (1996). Spare the needle but not the punishment: the incarceration of waived youth in Texas prisons. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  34. Garland, D. (1985). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  35. Geyh, C. G. (2008). When courts & congress collide: the struggle for control of America’s judicial system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  36. Giles, M. W., & Buckner, M. (1993). David Duke and Black Threat: An Old Hypothesis Revisited. Journal of Politics, 57(3), 702–713.Google Scholar
  37. Gordon, S. C., & Huber, G. (2007). The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 107–138.Google Scholar
  38. Greenberg, D. F., & West, V. (2001). State prison populations and their growth, 1971–1991. Criminology, 39(3), 615–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenberg, D. F. (2001). Novus Ordo Saeclorum?: A commentary on Downes, and on Beckett and Western. Punishment & Society, 59, 471–491.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, M. G. (1992). Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics, 54, 1117–24.Google Scholar
  41. Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2003). Generalized Estimating Equations. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
  42. Helms, R., & Jacobs, D. (2002). The political context of sentencing: an analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hopson, R. K., & Obidah, J. E. (2002). When getting tough means getting tougher: historical and conceptual understandings of juveniles of color sentenced as adults in the United States. Journal of Negro Education, 71, 158–174.Google Scholar
  45. Huang, W. S., Finn, M. A., Ruback, R. B., & Friedmann, R. R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: examining political conservatism. The Prison Journal, 76(4), 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huber, G. A., & Gordon, S. C. (2004). Accountability and coercion: is justice blind when it runs for office? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 247–263.Google Scholar
  47. Irwin, J. (2005). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, P. I., & Carroll, L. G. (1981). Race and the war on crime: the sociopolitical determinants of municipal police expenditures. American Sociological Review, 46, 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jackson, P. I. (1989). Minority group threat, crime and policing: Social context and social control. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  50. Jacobs, D. (1979). Inequality and police strength: conflict theory and coercive control in metropolitanareas. American Sociological Review 44, 913–925.Google Scholar
  51. Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2001). The politics of punishment across time and space: a pooled time- series analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 80, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: a pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2004). Ideology, social threat, and death sentences: capital sentencing across time and space. Social Forces, 83, 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jacobs, D., Carmichael, J. T., & Kent, S. L. (2005). Vigilantism, current racial threat, and death sentences. American Sociological Review, 70, 656–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. (1996). Toward a political model of incarceration: a time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 323–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. (1999). Collective outbursts, politics, and punitive resources: toward a political sociology of spending on social control. Social Forces, 77, 1497–1523.Google Scholar
  57. Keiser, L. R., Meuser, P., & Choi, S.-W. (2004). Race, bureaucratic discretion, and the implementation of welfare reform. Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 314–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kuklinski, J. H., & Stanga, J. E. (1979). Political participation and government responsiveness: the behavior of California superior courts. American Political Science Review, 73, 1090–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kupchik, A. (2003). Prosecuting adolescence in criminal courts: criminal or juvenile justice. Social Problems, 50, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liska, A. E., Lawrence, J. J., & Benson, M. (1981). Perspectives on the legal order: the capacity for social control. American Journal of Sociology 87, 413–426.Google Scholar
  61. Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Long, S. J., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata.Google Scholar
  63. Leiber, M. J., & Mack, K. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leiber, M. J., Johnson, J., Fox, K., & Lacks, R. (2007). Differentiating among racial/ethnic groups and its implications for understanding juvenile justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leiber, M. J., & Johnson, J. D. (2008). Being young and black: what are their effects on juvenile justice decision making? Crime and Delinquency, 54, 560–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lynch, M. J. (2007). Big prisons big dreams: Crime and the failure of America’s penal system. NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lynch, M. J., & Michalowski, R. J. (2006). Primer in radical criminology (4th ed.). Monsey: Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
  68. Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. E. (1996). Determinate sentencing and abolishing parole: the long-term impacts on prisons and crime. Criminology, 34(1), 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Meinke, S. R., Staton, J. K., & Wuhs, S. T. (2005). State delegation selection rules for presidential nominations, 1972–2000. The Journal of Politics 68, 180–193.Google Scholar
  70. Myers, M., & Talarico, S. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nellis, A., & King, R. S. (2009). No exit: The expanding use of life sentences in America. Washington: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
  72. Oliver, W. M. (2003). The law and order presidency. NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  73. Olzak, S. (1989). Labor unrest, imigration, and ethnic conflict in urban America, 1880–1914. American Journal of Sociology 94, 1303–1333.Google Scholar
  74. Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighborhoods, high crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluation of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rusche, G., & Kirchheimer, O. (1939). Punishment and social structure. NY: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
  76. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review 27, 285–312.Google Scholar
  77. Scheingold, S. A. (1984). The politics of law and order: Street crime and public policy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  78. Scheingold, S. A. (1991). The politics of street crime: criminal process and cultural obsession. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, K. (2004). The politics of punishment: a political model of punishment. Journal of Politics, 66(3), 925–38.Google Scholar
  80. Sorensen, J., & Stemen, D. (2002). The effect of state sentencing policies on incarceration rates. Crime and Delinquency 48, 456–475.Google Scholar
  81. Soule, S., & Van Dyke, N. (1999). Black church arson in the United States, 1989–1996. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(4), 724–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sutton, J. (2000). Imprisonment and social classification in five common-law democracies, 1955–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 350–386.Google Scholar
  83. Thorne, M. J. (1990). American conservative thought since World War II: The core ideas. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  84. Tittle, C., & Curran, D. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces 67, 23–58.Google Scholar
  85. Tolnay, S. E., Beck, E. M., & Massey, J. L. (1989). Black Lynchings: the power-threat hypothesis revisited. Social Forces, 67(3), 605–23.Google Scholar
  86. Tonry, M. (1994). Racial politics, racial disparities, and the war on crime. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turk, A. T. (1969). Criminality and the legal order. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  88. Turk, A. T. (1982). Social control and social conflict. In G. Jack (Ed.), Social control: Views from the social sciences (pp. 347–372). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  89. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2006). Sentencing in context: a multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–178.Google Scholar
  90. Ulmer, J. T., Bader, C., & Gault, M. (2008). Do moral communities play a role in criminal sentencing? Evidence from Pennsylvania. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(4), 737–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weiner, R. R., Frase, R. S., & Schultz, J. S. (2005). The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: a multilevel analysis. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weidner, R., Frase, R., & Pardoe, I. (2004). Explaining sentence severity in large urban counties: a multilevel analysis of contextual and case-level factors. The Prison Journal, 84, 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity.Econometrica 48, 817–838.Google Scholar
  94. Zimring, F. E. (2005). American juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations