Social Disorganization and Neighborhood Fear: Examining the Intersection of Individual, Community, and County Characteristics
Fear has long been studied as a consequence of crime given the consistent and ubiquitous nature of fear as a reaction and the systematic variations in its consequences. Past research has shown significant variations in fear of crime at both the individual and ecological level. Here we implement a multi-level approach to understanding potential interactions between perceived safety in one’s neighborhood in relation to social disorganization indicators at the neighborhood level and crime rates at the county level. The nationally representative sample data (n = 2,610) used in this analysis combines individual level data collected in 2006 from the Panel Study of Religion and Ethnicity (PS-ARE) with ecological level data at the tract and county level from the 2000 US Census. The findings suggest a three level interaction negating the well known protection hypothesis of marriage and crime; this essentially means that as being married or cohabitating decreases the negative effects of being in a community with a high level of familial disruption (percent of divorced) increases, but that effect is substantively negatively tempered as the violent crime rate of the county rises.
KeywordsFear of crime Social disorganization PS-ARE Neighborhood effects County
- Madriz, E. (1997). Nothing bad happens to good girls: Fear of crime in women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- May, D. C., Rader, N. E., & Goodrum, S. (2009). A gendered assessment of the “threat of victimization:” Examining gender differences in fear of crime, perceived risk, avoidance, and defensive behavior. Criminal Justice Review OnlineFirst, published on November 10, 2009 as doi:10.1177/0734016809349166.
- Paulsen, D. J., & Robinson, M. B. (2004). Spatial aspects of crime: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- Rader, N. E. (2008). Gendered fear strategies: Intersections of doing gender and fear management strategies in married and divorced women’s lives. Sociological Focus, 41, 34–52.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York/Toronto: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
- Warr, M. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (Vol. 4, pp. 451–489). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Wilcox, W., Dougherty, W., Fisher, H., Galston, W., Glenn, N., Gottman, J., et al. (2005). Why marriage matters, Second Edition: Twenty-six conclusions from the social sciences. A Report from Family Scholars. New York: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
- Zhao, L. S., Lawton, B., & Longmire, D. (2010). An examination of the micro-level crime-fear of crime link. Crime & Delinquency, online first online 11 November 2010 doi:10.1177/0011128710386203.