Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of the Work Environment on Prison Staff: The Issue of Consideration, Structure, Job Variety, and Training

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correctional staff are instrumental in ensuring the success of any correctional institution; therefore, investigating how the work environment impacts correctional workers is essential. To determine the effects of supervisory consideration, supervisory structure, job variety, and perceptions of training on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment, data from a survey of staff at a Midwestern private correctional facility were examined. The Ordinary Least Squares regression results indicate that each of the work environment factors had a significant impact on one or more of the three outcomes. Specifically, supervisory consideration and perceptions of training decreased job stress. Supervisory consideration, job variety, and perceptions of training had positive effects on job satisfaction. Finally, supervisory consideration, supervisory structure, job variety, and perceptions of training had positive relationships with organizational commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, G., & Griffin, M. (2004). Does the job matter? Comparing correlates of stress among treatment and correctional staff in prisons. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 577–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield, A., & Rothe, H. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, F. (1984). Stress management for correctional officers and their families. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, F., & Miller, M. (1983). The experience of stress for correctional officers: A double-bind theory of correctional stress. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A., & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J., Regoli, R., Hewitt, J., & Culbertson, R. (1995). Institutional and organizational antecedents of role stress, work alienation, and anomie among police executives. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranny, C., Smith, P., & Stone, E. (Eds.). (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York: Lexington Books.

  • Cullen, F., Link, B., Wolfe, N., & Frank, J. (1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Quarterly, 2, 505–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culliver, C., Sigler, R., & McNeely, B. (1991). Examining prosocial organizational behavior among correctional officers. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 15, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J., Wakefield, D., Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 847–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, C., & Tellier, C. (2004). Predicting work-related stress in correctional officers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. (2001). Job satisfaction among detention officers: Assessing the relative contribution of organizational climate variables. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M., & Hepburn, J. (2005). Side-bets and reciprocity as determinants of organizational commitment among correctional officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, N., Lambert, E., Jenkins, M., & Wambold, S. (2006). The impact of occupational stressors on correctional staff organizational commitment: A preliminary study. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22, 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerce, E., Magnusson, P., & Rudolph, A. (1994). The attitudes of Navy corrections staff members: What they think about confinees and their jobs. San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. (2003). Justice in corrections: An exploratory study of the impact of organizational justice on correctional staff. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. (2006). I want to leave: A test of a model of turnover intent among correctional staff [Electronic Version]. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2(1), 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., & Paoline, E. (2005). The impact of jail medical issues on the job stress and job satisfaction of jail staff: An exploratory study. Punishment and Society: The International Journal of Penology, 7, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Hogan, N., & Barton, S. (2002). Building commitment among correctional staff: The issue of feedback, promotional opportunities, and organizational fairness. Corrections Compendium, 27(3), 1–5, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Edwards, C., Camp, S., & Saylor, W. (2005). Here today, gone tomorrow, back again the next day: Absenteeism and its antecedents among federal correctional staff. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Hogan, H., Paoline, E., & Baker, D. (2005). The good life: The impact of job satisfaction and occupational stressors on correctional staff life satisfaction - An exploratory study. Journal of Crime and Justice, 18, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Hogan, N., Camp, S., & Ventura, L. (2006). The impact of work-family conflict on correctional staff: A preliminary study among private prison staff. Criminology and Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 6, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Paoline, E., & Hogan, N. (2006). The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 19, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, M., & Ivancevich, J. (1987). Controlling work stress: Effective human resource and management strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, A., & Maguire, K. (Eds.). (2006). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 31st ed. Retrieved on March 19, 2006 from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/.

  • Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover among hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slate, R., & Vogel, R. (1997). Participative management and correctional personnel: A study of the perceived atmosphere for participation in correctional decision making and its impact on employee stress and thoughts of quitting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. (1996). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, M., Lovrich, N., & Wood, M. (1996). Service versus security concerns in contemporary jails: Testing general differences in training topic assessments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R. (1981). A test of a model of department store salespeople’s job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 57, 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, L. (1993). Occupational stress for correctional personnel. American Jails, 7, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Janet Lambert for editing and proofreading the paper. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric G. Lambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L., Moore, B. et al. The Impact of the Work Environment on Prison Staff: The Issue of Consideration, Structure, Job Variety, and Training. Am J Crim Just 34, 166–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-009-9062-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-009-9062-6

Keywords

Navigation