Skip to main content
Log in

Early Blood Pressure Changes in Neonatal Sepsis and the Risk of Mortality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare blood pressures (BP) between neonates with culture-proven sepsis and clinical sepsis in the first 120 h of sepsis onset and to examine association between BP and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

In this cohort study, consecutively enrolled neonates with ‘culture-proven’ sepsis [growth in blood/ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within 48 h] and clinical sepsis (sepsis workup negative, cultures sterile) were analyzed. Their BP was recorded every 3-hourly for initial 120 h and averaged in 20 time-epochs of 6 h each (0–6 h to 115–120 h). BP Z-scores were compared between neonates with culture-proven vs. clinical sepsis and survivors vs. non-survivors.

Results

Two hundred twenty eight neonates (102—culture-proven and 126—clinical sepsis) were enrolled. Both groups had comparable BP Z-scores except significantly lower diastolic BP (DBP) and mean BP (MBP) in 0–6 and 13–18 time-epochs in culture-proven sepsis group. Fifty-four neonates (24%) died during their hospital stay. BP Z-scores in the initial 54 h of sepsis were independently associated with mortality [systolic BP (SBP) Z-scores in first 54 h, DBP Z-scores in first 24 h, and MBP Z-scores in first 24 h] after adjusting for gestational age, birth weight, cesarean delivery, and 5-min Apgar score. On receiver operating characteristic curves, SBP Z-scores showed better discriminative ability than DBP and MBP to identify non-survivors.

Conclusions

Neonates with culture-proven and clinical sepsis had comparable BP Z-scores except low DBP and MBP in the initial few hours in culture-proven sepsis. BP in initial 54 h of sepsis was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. SBP discriminated non-survivors better than DBP and MBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, et al. American College of critical Care Medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1061–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21:e52–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Osborn DA, Evans N, Kluckow M. Clinical detection of low upper body blood flow in very premature infants using blood pressure, capillary refill time, and central-peripheral temperature difference. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh Y, Katheria AC, Vora F. Advances in diagnosis and management of hemodynamic instability in neonatal shock. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:2–8.

  6. Zhu F, Baczynski M, Kharrat A, Ye XY, Weisz D, Jain A. Blood pressure, organ dysfunction, and mortality in preterm neonates with late-onset sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2022;92:498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyu Y, Ye XY, Isayama T, et al. Admission systolic blood pressure and outcomes in preterm infants of = 26 weeks’ gestation</at. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34:1271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dionne JM, Bremner SA, Baygani SK, et al. Method of blood pressure measurement in neonates and infants: a systematic review and analysis. J Pediatr. 2020;221:23–31.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B; Philadelphia Neonatal Blood Pressure Study Group. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. J Perinatol. 1995;15:470–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiesa C, Natale F, Pascone R, et al. C reactive protein and procalcitonin: reference intervals for preterm and term newborns during the early neonatal period. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:1053–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Browne R. The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr. 1979;95:89–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouzinho A, Rosenfeld CR, Sanchez PJ, Risser R. Revised reference ranges for circulating neutrophils in very-low-birth-weight neonates. Pediatrics. 1994;94:76–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saini SS, Kumar P, Kumar RM. Hemodynamic changes in preterm neonates with septic shock: a prospective observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Shiv Sajan Saini received funding for this study from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SSS: Developed the protocol, performed analysis, supervised the patient recruitment, reviewed, and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; AKS: Supervised data collection, crosschecked data entry, organized data in excel spreadsheets, reviewed, and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; VS, SD, PK: Supervised the patient recruitment, reviewed, and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. PK will act as guarantor for this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiv Sajan Saini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Committee Approval

Institute’s Ethics Committee approved the study (Approval no IEC-04/2019 - 1231 Dated 13.05.2019).

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, S.S., Shrivastav, A.K., Sundaram, V. et al. Early Blood Pressure Changes in Neonatal Sepsis and the Risk of Mortality. Indian J Pediatr 90, 1096–1102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04597-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04597-7

Keywords

Navigation