Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility, Sustainability, and Effectiveness of the Implementation of “Facility-Team-Driven” Approach for Improving the Quality of Newborn Care in South India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The primary objective of the study was to assess the feasibility and sustainability of the implementation of the point of care quality improvement (POCQI) methodology for improving the quality of neonatal care at the level 2 special newborn care unit (SNCU). Additional objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the quality improvement (QI) and preterm baby package training model.

Methods

This study was conducted in a level-II SNCU. The study period was divided into baseline; intervention and sustenance phases. The primary outcome i.e., feasibility was defined as completion of training for 80% or more health care professionals (HCPs) through workshops, their attendance in subsequent review meetings and, successful accomplishment of at least two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles in each project.

Results

Of the total, 1217 neonates were enrolled during the 14 mo study period; 80 neonates in the baseline, 1019 in intervention and 118 in sustenance phases. Feasibility of training was achieved within a month of initiation of intervention phase; 22/24 (92%) nurses and 14/15 (93%) doctors attended the meetings. The outcomes of individual projects suggested an improvement in proportion of neonates being given exclusive breast milk on day 5 (22.8% to 78%); mean difference (95% CI) [55.2 (46.5 to 63.9)]. Neonates on any antibiotics declined, proportion of any enteral feeds on day one and duration of kangaroo mother care (KMC) increased. Proportion of neonates receiving intravenous fluids during phototherapy decreased.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates the feasibility, sustainability, and effectiveness of a facility-team-driven QI approach augmented with capacity building and post-training supportive supervision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Estimation UNI-aGfCM. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. New York: Estimates Developed by the Un Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2015. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/resources/levels-and-trends-in-child-mortality/. Accessed on 10th Jan 2021.

  2. NHSRC. Programme Evaluation of the Janani Suraksha Yojana. New Delhi: MOHFW, Government of India. 2011. Available at: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/JSY%20Programme%20Evaluation.pdf. Accessed on 10th Jan 2021.

  3. Neogi SB, Khanna R, Chauhan M, et al. Inpatient care of small and sick newborns in healthcare facilities. J Perinatol. 2016;36:S18-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. National Health Mission. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Care of Small and Sick Newborns in Special Newborn Care Units (SNCUs) of India. Two-year report (2013 - 2015). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. 2015. Available at: https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/child-health/annual-report/Two_Year_Progress_of_SNCUs-A_Brief_Report_(2011-12_&_2012-13).pdf. Accessed on 10th Jan 2021.

  5. Chaturvedi S, Upadhyay S, De Costa A. Competence of birth attendants at providing emergency obstetric care under India’s JSY conditional cash transfer program for institutional delivery: an assessment using case vignettes in Madhya Pradesh province. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Marx Delaney M, et al. BetterBirth Trial Group. Outcomes of a coaching-based WHO safe childbirth checklist program in India. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2313–24.

  7. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122:1045–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowe AK, Rowe SY, Peters DH, Holloway KA, Chalker J, Ross-Degnan D. Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1163–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal R, Agarwal K, Acharya U, Christina P, Sreenivas V, Seetaraman S. Impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India. J Perinatol. 2007;27:44–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi M, Sahoo T, Thukral A, Joshi P, Sethi A, Agarwal R. improving duration of kangaroo mother care in a tertiary-care neonatal unit: a quality improvement initiative. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:744–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivanandan S, Sethi A, Joshi M, et al. Gains from quality improvement initiatives - experience from a tertiary-care institute in India. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:809–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal R, Chawla D, Sharma M, et al. QI Haryana Study Collaboration. Improving quality of care during childbirth in primary health centres: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in India. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3:e000907.

  13. Meyers JM, Tulloch J, Brown K, Caserta MT, D'Angio CT. Golisano Children’s Hospital NICU Antibiotic Stewardship Team. A quality improvement initiative to optimize antibiotic use in a level 4 NICU. Pediatrics. 2020;146:e20193956.

  14. Kommalur A, Baddadka V, Devadas S, et al. Decreasing antibiotic over-use by implementation of an antibiotic stewardship programme in preterm neonates in resource limited settings - a quality improvement initiative. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2021;41:103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Renfrew MJ, Craig D, Dyson L, et al. Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engmann C, Wall S, Darmstadt G, Valsangkar B, Claeson M. participants of the Istanbul KMC Acceleration Meeting. Consensus on kangaroo mother care acceleration. Lancet. 2013;382:e26–7.

  17. Zaka N, Alexander EC, Manikam L, et al. Quality improvement initiatives for hospitalised small and sick newborns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Walrath-Greene CM. Evidence-based practice implementation: the impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice. Implement Sci. 2009;4:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zamboni K, Singh S, Tyagi M, Hill Z, Hanson C, Schellenberg J. Effect of collaborative quality improvement on stillbirths, neonatal mortality and newborn care practices in hospitals of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India: evidence from a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. Implement Sci. 2021;16:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prashantha YN, Shashidhar A, Balasunder BC, Kumar BP, Rao PN. Onsite mentoring of special newborn care unit to improve the quality of newborn care. Indian J Public Health. 2019;63:357–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deorari AK, Kumar P, Chawla D, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity-quality improvement India Study Group. Improving the quality of health care in special neonatal care units of India: a before and after intervention study. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10:e2200085.

  22. Walker D, Otieno P, Butrick E, et al. Preterm Birth Initiative Kenya and Uganda Implementation Research Collaborative. Effect of a quality improvement package for intrapartum and immediate newborn care on fresh stillbirth and neonatal mortality among preterm and low-birthweight babies in Kenya and Uganda: a cluster-randomised facility-based trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1061–70.

  23. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79:281–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Groene O, Klazinga N, Wagner C, et al. Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe Research Project. Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)' project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:281.

  25. Maritz R, Scheel-Sailer A, Schmitt K, Prodinger B. Overview of quality management models for inpatient healthcare settings. A scoping review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31:404–10.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Delhi team who helped as facilitators to conduct first workshop on quality Improvement (Dr. Ashish Jain, Dr. Pratima Anand and Dr. Srikanth) and Team from St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore (Dr. Prasanth Y, Dr. Shashidhar T, Sister Sophia) who helped as facilitators to conduct second workshop (Preterm baby package) in Shivamogga. The authors thank the neonates and their parents for consenting for participation in the study and also the team at Shimoga Medical College for their support for the conduct of the current work. Also, they are thankful to Dr. Rajesh Mehta, Regional Adviser-Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization (WHO)-Regional Office for South-East Asia for his critical inputs in the manuscript.

Team Shimoga Medical College: Manjunatha Swamy, Chandrashekar Malabennur, Shree Shail Benekanal, Vijayalaxmi, Sunitha P, Bhimaraya Shivasharana, Veeresh Santebennure Murigendarappa, Manoj Gendal Muddappagowda, Anjana Rao, Vikas Kagathur Gowdru, Chaitra Harishchandra, Akkamma Muttappa Attigeri, Shruthy Eshwar, Department of Pediatrics, Shimoga Medical College, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India

Funding

The study was funded through a grant by Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust (QEDJT) through Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

VS: Principal investigator, reviewed literature, prepared the initial protocol and this manuscript, supervised data collection at Shimoga Medical College and performed analysis under supervision of MJS; RBP and VKDL: supervised data collection at Shimoga Medical College, helped guide teams through onsite mentoring and steered fortnightly team meeting and provided inputs and helped in finalization of this manuscript; RA, MJS, AT, AV, RAK: helped in preparation of initial protocol and this manuscript, supervised the study and critical revision of this manuscript; AKD: framed the idea and rationale of this study, reviewed the protocol, supervised this study throughout its course, critical revision and finalization of this manuscript; AT, RA and AKD: supervised the implementation, helped guide teams through remote mentoring. Team Shimoga Medical College was involved in quality improvement program training, formulating aim statements for QI projects, executing these projects, attending the bimonthly  QI meeting, and giving feedback. They collected data for the projects, analyzed data, and thereafter guided other teams for different QI projects. RBP will act as the guarantor for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok K. Deorari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 103 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venugopal, S., Patil, R.B., Thukral, A. et al. Feasibility, Sustainability, and Effectiveness of the Implementation of “Facility-Team-Driven” Approach for Improving the Quality of Newborn Care in South India. Indian J Pediatr 90, 974–981 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04518-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04518-8

Keyword

Navigation