Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the ability of the Nemocare Raksha (NR), an internet of things (IoT)–enabled device, to continuously monitor vitals for 6 h and its safety in newborns. The accuracy of the device was also compared with the readings from the standard device used in the pediatric ward.
Method
Forty neonates (either gender) weighing ≥ 1.5 kg were included in the study. Heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, and oxygen saturation was measured using the NR and compared with standard care devices. Safety was assessed by monitoring for skin changes and local rise in temperature. The neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) was used to assess pain and discomfort.
Result
A total of 227 h of observations (5.67 h per baby) were obtained. No discomfort or device-related adverse events were noted during the study period. The mean difference between the NR and the standard monitoring was 0.66 (0.42 to 0.90) for temperature (°C); −6.57 (−8.66 to −4.47) for heart rate (bpm); 7.60 (6.52 to 8.68) for respiratory rate (breaths per minute); −0.79 (−1.10 to −0.48) for oxygen saturation (%). The level of agreement analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was good for heart rate [ICC 0.77 (0.72 to 0.82); p value < 0.001] and oxygen saturation [ICC 0.80 (0.75 to 0.84); p value < 0.001]; moderate for body temperature [ICC 0.54 (0.36 to 0.60); p value < 0.001] and poor for respiratory rate [ICC 0.30 (0.10 to 0.44); p value 0.002].
Conclusion
The NR was able to seamlessly monitor vital parameters in neonates without any safety concern. The device showed a good level of agreement for heart rate and oxygen saturation among the four parameters measured.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization. Newborns: improving survival and well-being. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality. Accessed on 9 Feb 2022.
India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Child Mortality Collaborators. Subnational mapping of under-5 and neonatal mortality trends in India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–17. Lancet. 2020;395:1640–58.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. INAP: India Newborn Action Plan. 2014. Available at: https://www.newbornwhocc.org/INAP_Final.pdf. Accessed on 10 Sept 2019.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National Health Policy 2017. 2017. Available at: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/9147562941489753121.pdf. Accessed on 10 Sept 2019.
Ginsburg AS, Nkwopara E, Macharia W, et al Evaluation of non-invasive continuous physiological monitoring devices for neonates in Nairobi, Kenya: a research protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e035184.
Chan PY, McNeil J, Nguyen T, Ryan N, Hopper I. Novel wearable and contactless monitoring devices to identify deteriorating patients in the clinical setting: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2020;9:104.
Nuttall G, Burckhardt J, Hadley A, et al. Surgical and patient risk factors for severe arterial line complications in adults. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:590–7.
Zargaran D, Hardwick S, Adel R, Hill G, Stubbins D, Salmasi AM. Sphygmomanometer cuffs: a potential source of infection! Angiology. 2015;66:118–21.
Hunter A, Johnson L, Coustasse A. Reduction of intensive care unit length of stay: the case of early mobilization. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014;33:128–35.
Hasan MNU, Negulescu II. Wearable technology for baby monitoring: a review. J Textile Eng Fashion Technol. 2020;6:112–20.
ISO 14971:2019 Medical devices — Application of risk management to medical devices. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/72704.html. Accessed on 8 June 2022.
Obiedat H, Al-Maaitah EI. Critique of the use of Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). Neonat Pediatr Med. 2020;6:186.
Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.
Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18636.
Chung HU, Kim BH, Lee JY, et al. Binodal, wireless epidermal electronic systems with in-sensor analytics for neonatal intensive care. Science. 2019;363:eaau0780.
Chung HU, Rwei AY, Hourlier-Fargette A, et al. Skin-interfaced biosensors for advanced wireless physiological monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive-care units. Nat Med. 2020;26:418–29.
Rao H, Saxena D, Kumar S, et al. Low power remote neonatal temperature monitoring device. Biodevices. 2014;28‒38. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004798300280038.
Mansab F, Donnelly H, Kussner A, Neil J, Bhatti S, Goyal DK. Oxygen and mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia: A comparative analysis of supplemental oxygen policies and health outcomes across 26 countries. Front Public Health. 2021;9:580585.
NHS. Pulse oximetry to detect early deterioration of patients with COVID-19 in primary and community care settings, 2020. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/pulse-oximetry-to-detect-early-deterioration-of-patients-with-covid-19-in-primary-and-community-care-settings/. Accessed on 8 June 2022
Vindrola-Padros C, Singh KE, Sidhu MS, et al. Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: A rapid systematic review. EClin Med. 2021;37:100965.
Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:369–78.
Faes L, Bachmann LM, Sim DA. Home monitoring as a useful extension of modern tele-ophthalmology. Eye (Lond). 2020;34:1950–3.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the parents for consenting to the participation of their babies in this study. They acknowledge the staff of the Clinical Research Department, Sister Punitha Rani, and Ms. Madhu Rudra for helping in the data collection. The authors sincerely thank Dr Alben Sigamani, the former head of the Clinical Research Department, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore for his suggestions during the designing stage of the study and TBI-MSMF.
Funding
The study was supported by a BIRAC grant (BIRAC/IKP0806/BIG-13/18) to Manoj Sanker.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RA recruited subjects for the study and performed the final review for the manuscript; VG designed the study and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript; DM analyzed the data; MS and SP provided training on the investigational device, reviewed the manuscript, and provided inputs. The final manuscript was reviewed by all the authors. RA will act as the guarantor for this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
MS and SP are employees of Nemocare Wellness Pvt. Ltd. and were not involved in the designing, conduct of the study, and final analysis of data. However, the final manuscript was reviewed by both MS and SP.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aggarwal, R., Gunaseelan, V., Manual, D. et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Wireless Device for Monitoring Vitals in Newborn Babies. Indian J Pediatr 90, 1110–1115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-022-04459-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-022-04459-8