The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 168–169 | Cite as

Developing and Testing Fidelity of Manikins for Training in Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation: Need of the Hour!

  • Krishna Mohan Gulla
  • Tanushree Sahoo
  • Jhuma SankarEmail author
Editorial Commentary

Successful resuscitation is the most important determinant of survival after a cardiopulmonary arrest [1]. Like resuscitation, training healthcare providers in the performance of resuscitation is a demanding job. The classic apprenticeship model of medical teaching “see one, do one, teach one” may not be sufficient in resuscitation training due to the rarity and unpredictable timing of events. With increasing emphasis on providing quality care and concerns about patient safety, resuscitating patients without mastering the knowledge and skills for novice residents/ fellows is a cause of concern.

Simulation based education helps in acquisition of the necessary life saving skills in a controlled and safe environment [2, 3]. Simulation based learning improves the self confidence of health care providers. A systematic review of 182 studies on simulation technology for resuscitation concluded that efficacy of simulation based training compared with other traditional methods resulted in...


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest



  1. 1.
    American Heart Association Guidelines. Update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132:S315–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mundell WC, Kennedy CC, Szostek JH, Cook DA. Simulation technology for resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2013;84:1174–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drummond D, Arnaud C, Thouvenin G, et al. An innovative pedagogic course combining video and simulation to teach medical students about pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest: a prospective controlled study. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:767–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng A, Lang TR, Starr SR, Pusic M, Cook DA. Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e1313–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curran V, Fleet L, White S, et al. A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015;20:205–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fletcher DJ, Militello R, Schoeffler GL, Rogers CL. Development and evaluation of a high-fidelity canine patient simulator for veterinary clinical training. J Vet Med Educ. 2012;39:7–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thielen M, Joshi R, Delbressine F, Bambang Oetomo S, Feijs L. An innovative design for cardiopulmonary resuscitation manikins based on a human-like thorax and embedded flow sensors. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017;231:243–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mileder L, Urlesberger B, Schwindt J, Simma B, Schmölzer G. Compliance with guidelines recommending the use of simulation for neonatal and infant resuscitation training in Austria. Klin Padiatr. 2014;226:24–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girish M, Rawekar A, Jose S, Chaudhari U, Nanoti G. Utility of low fidelity manikins for learning high quality chest compressions. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;
  10. 10.
    Conlon LW, Rodgers DL, Shofer FS, Lipschik GY. Impact of levels of simulation fidelity on training of interns in ACLS. Hosp Pract. 2014;42:135–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishna Mohan Gulla
    • 1
  • Tanushree Sahoo
    • 1
  • Jhuma Sankar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations