Utility of Low Fidelity Manikins for Learning High Quality Chest Compressions

  • Meenakshi Girish
  • Alka Rawekar
  • Sujo Jose
  • Umesh Chaudhari
  • Girish Nanoti
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Primarily, to measure the adequacy of chest compression depth after training on low fidelity manikins and secondarily to assess the comparative experience of the learners on high fidelity and low fidelity simulators.

Methods

An observational cohort study in which seventy-two first year postgraduate students underwent a Basic Life Support (BLS) workshop conducted by AHA accredited BLS trainers and they were then required to perform on a high fidelity manikin to objectively record the quality of their performance.

Results

There were 34 (47.22%) male and 38 (52.77%) female participants. CPR skills, as judged by checklist of sequential actions and visual inspection during the BLS training on low fidelity simulators (LFS) were correctly performed by majority (95.89%) participants. However, none of the participants could achieve the recommended depth for high quality chest compressions. The participants’ perception of degree of realism and their practical experience on both the types of manikins were similar.

Conclusions

Low fidelity manikins are useful for training CPR in sequential manner but fail to impart quality of chest compressions as per AHA recommendations.

Keywords

Chest compressions depth Low simulator manikins Basic life support training 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the EMS committee of the Institute and the AHA certified instructors for supporting the research project.

Contributions

MG: developed concept, designed study methodology and drafted the manuscript; AK: designed the study and helped in reviewing research protocol; SJ: collected the data and helped in data interpretation; UC: analyzed data; GN: reviewed manuscript and data tables. MG will act as guarantor for this paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

  1. 1.
    American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132:S2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Fam Commun Med. 2010;17:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sato Y, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:733–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu T, Weil M, Tang W, et al. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:368–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    2015. International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2015;132:S1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation – continuum of medical education? Med Edu. 2003;37:S22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Giovanni D, Roberts T, Norman G. Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Med Edu. 2009;43:661–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng A, Lockey A, Bhanji F, Lin Y, Hunt EA, Lang E. The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;93:142–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meurling L, Hedman L, Lidefelt K-J, Escher C, Felländer-Tsai L, Wallin C-J. Comparison of high and low equipment fidelity during pediatric simulation team training – a case control study. BMC Med Edu. 2014;14:221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. 2015;32:S2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meenakshi Girish
    • 1
  • Alka Rawekar
    • 2
  • Sujo Jose
    • 3
  • Umesh Chaudhari
    • 1
  • Girish Nanoti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsNKP Salve Institute of Medical SciencesNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyJNMC, DMIMSSawangiIndia
  3. 3.Nursing DepartmentNKP Salve Institute of Medical SciencesNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations