Skip to main content
Log in

Wide-field Digital Ophthalmic Imaging in Infants using Nasal Endoscopic System

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To report the utility of nasal endoscopic system in viewing the iridocorneal angle and fundus using various nasal endoscopes and light sources and to determine which type suits best to image a given location in the eye.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study of 20 eyes of 10 consecutive infants, who were scheduled for irrigation and probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction under general anesthesia. The pupils were dilated, viscoelastic gel was applied on the cornea and imaging was performed using nasal endoscopes. The endoscopes used were of 2.7 mm and 4 mm diameter, each with various angulations of 00, 300 and 700. Two different cold light illuminators (Xenon and Halogen) were used uniformly in all cases. Images were analyzed for their quality, clarity and extent of the fields captured.

Results

In all the 20 eyes, nasal endoscope provided a clear circular view of the iridocorneal angle and wide-field fundus view in a single glimpse. The 4 mm endoscope offered a wider view while in-air disc analysis was better with the 2.7 mm endoscope. Angulated endoscopes were more useful in imaging the iridocorneal angle, peripheral retina up to the ora serrata and ciliary body. The image quality with the xenon and halogen light sources were found to be comparable. The time taken for a single eye examination did not exceed 5 min.

Conclusions

With good techniques and appropriate selection of nasal endoscopes, viewing of the iridocorneal angle and fundus is easy, possibly less expensive and very useful in infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yannuzzi LA, Ober MD, Slakter JS, et al. Ophthalmic fundus imaging: today and beyond. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:511–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Constable IJ, Yogesan K, Eikelboom R, Barry C, Cuypers M. Fred hollows lecture: digital screening for eye disease. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tran K, Mendal TA, Holbrook KL, Yates PA. Construction of an inexpensive hand-held fundus camera through modification of a consumer ‘point and shoot’ camera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7600–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gliss C, Parel JM, Flynn JT, Pratisto H, Niederer P. Toward a miniaturized fundus camera. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shanmugam PM, Ramanjulu R, Mishra KC. Fundus imaging with a nasal endoscope. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:69–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shanmugam MP, Mishra DK, Madhukumar R, Ramanjulu R, Reddy SY, Rodriques G. Fundus imaging with a mobile phone: a review of techniques. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:960–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Haddock LJ, Kim DY, Mukai S. Simple, inexpensive technique for high quality smart phone fundus photography in human and animal eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/518479.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paques M, Guyomard JL, Simonutti M, et al. Pan retinal high-resolution colour photography of the mouse fundus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2769–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyomard JL, Rosolen SG, Paques M, et al. A low-cost and simple imaging technique of the anterior and posterior segments: eye fundus, ciliary bodies, iridocorneal angle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solley WA, Sternberg Jr P. Retinal phototoxicity. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1999;39:1–12.

  11. Kwarg SG, Linstone FA, Daniels SA, et al. Incidence, risk factors and morphology in operating microscope light retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:255–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomolin JE, Koenekoop RK. Presumed photic retinopathy after cataract surgery: an angiographic study. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993;28:221–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrnes GA, Antosyzk AN, Mazur DO, Kao TC, Miller SA. Photic maculopathy after extracapsular cataract surgery. A prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:731–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributions

MJA: Concepts, imaging, manuscript writing and will act as guarantor for this paper; SJ: Concepts and manuscript writing; JC: Grading of photographs and imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javed Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.J., Jalali, S. & Chhablani, J. Wide-field Digital Ophthalmic Imaging in Infants using Nasal Endoscopic System. Indian J Pediatr 83, 645–649 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-015-1963-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-015-1963-4

Keywords

Navigation