Abstract
Objective
To investigate, in a large pan Indian sample of school children, whether gadgets (toys) added to food increase food consumption, and if contemporary exposure to TV and/or advertising is a further promoting factor.
Methods
A total of 1,680 Indian children were first randomized to food exposure with or without toy and then to a five-level exposure to TV viewing and advertising according to a 2 × 5 full factorial ad libitum eating design study. The sample size was computed to detect a difference of 20 Kcal of caloric intake (assuming the same standard deviation of 20 Kcal in both groups) between “food with gadget” (Toy) and “food alone” (No Toy) groups in each level of the exposure to TV and advertising factor, given an alpha error equal to 0.05 and a power of 0.90.
Results
Mean caloric intake both in “Toy” and “No Toy” group was around 223 Kcal. When considering exposure to TV and advertising, mean values varied negligibly between 222 and 225 Kcal. According to linear models for the effect of gadget and exposure to TV and/or advertising on children’s intake, no significant adjusted associations were found, neither as main effects nor as interactions.
Conclusions
Food consumption by children is not influenced by the presence of added toys, even after adjustment for several potential confounding factors. The city where they live and age significantly influences Indian children’s caloric intake.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang Y, Chen HJ, Shaikh S, Mathur P. Is obesity becoming a public health problem in India? Examine the shift from under- to overnutrition problems over time. Obes Rev. 2009;10:456–74.
Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:3–21.
Kristiansen H, Juliusson PB, Eide GE, Roelants M, Bjerknes R. TV viewing and obesity among Norwegian children: the importance of parental education. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:199–205.
Garber AK, Lustig RH. Is fast food addictive? Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011;4:146–62.
Lobstein T, Dibb S. Evidence of a possible link between obesogenic food advertising and child overweight. Obes Rev. 2005;6:203–8.
Chandra PS, Abbas S, Palmer R. Are eating disorders a significant clinical issue in urban India? A survey among psychiatrists in Bangalore. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45:443–6.
Kuriyan R, Bhat S, Thomas T, VazM KAV. Television viewing and sleep are associated with overweight among urban and semi-urban South Indian children. Nutr J. 2007;6:25.
Skar M, Villumsen AB, Christensen DL, Petersen JH, Deepa M, Anjana RM, et al. Increased risk of type 2 diabetes with ascending social class in urban South Indians is explained by obesity: The Chennai urban rural epidemiology study (CURES-116). Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:1084–9.
Gregori D, Ballali S, Gafare CE, Casella A, Stefanini G, de Sousa AR. Investigating the obesogenic effects of marketing snacks with toys: an experimental study in Latin America. Nutr J. 2013;12:95.
Astrup A, Bovy MW, Nackenhorst K, Popova AE. Food for thought or thought for food?–a stakeholder dialogue around the role of the snacking industry in addressing the obesity epidemic. Obes Rev. 2006;7:303–12.
Hebebrand J. Putting the greater dimensions of obesity into perspective. Obes Facts. 2010;3:341–2.
O’Dea JA. Prevention of child obesity: ’first, do no harm’. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:259–65.
Halford JC, Gillespie J, Brown V, Pontin EE, Dovey TM. Effect of television advertisements for foods on food consumption in children. Appetite. 2004;42:221–5.
Nederkoorn C, Braet C, Van Eijs Y, Tanghe A, Jansen A. Why obese children cannot resist food: the role of impulsivity. Eat Behav. 2006;7:315–22.
Temple JL, Legierski CM, Giacomelli AM, Salvy SJ, Epstein LH. Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1121–7.
Wang Y, Zhang Q. Are American children and adolescents of low socioeconomic status at increased risk of obesity? Changes in the association between overweight and family income between 1971 and 2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:707–16.
Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML, Grummer-Strawn LM. Obesity in Latin American women and children. J Nutr. 1998;128:1464–73.
Monteiro CA, CondeWL PBM. Independent effects of income and education on the risk of obesity in the Brazilian adult population. J Nutr. 2001;131:881S–6S.
Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion to children. A review of the evidence to December 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
Pepe A, Armenti A. Knowledge building processes in blended learning communities: forum usage evaluation from a participatory framework for distance cooperation. Barcelona: Edulearn; 2009. p. 5075–85.
Horvath CW. Measuring television addiction. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2004;48:378–98.
Otten JJ, Hekler EB, Krukowski RA, Buman MP, Saelens BE, Gardner CD, et al. Food marketing to children through toys: response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:56–60.
Kovacic WE, Harbour PJ, Leibowitz J, Rosch JT. Marketing food to children and adolescents: a review of industry expenditures, activities, and self-regulation: a federal trade commission report to congress. Washington DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2008. p. 1–97.
Yeager K. An ordinance of the board of supervisors of the County of Santa Clara adding chapter XXII of division A18 to the County of Santa Clara ordinance code relating to toys and other incentives with restaurant food. Santa Clara: Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors; 2010. p. 1–6.
Peddycord D. Report regarding public health ordinance on childhood obesity. Santa Clara: Public Health Department; 2010. p. 1–6.
APA. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2002.
WHO. Growth reference data for 5–19 y. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
WHO. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
IAP. IAP Growth Charts. Patna: Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 2014.
Franchin L, Zobec F, Ghidina M, Stefanini G, Berchialla P, Gregori D. Measuring brand awareness as a component of eating habits in children: The development of the IBAI (International Brand Awareness Instrument) Italian version. Prog Nutr. 2012;14:132–40.
Bauman Z. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.
Ebrahim S, Kinra S, Bowen L, Andersen E, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lyngdoh T, et al; Indian Migration Study group. The effect of rural-tourban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000268.
Borradaile KE, Sherman S, Vander Veur SS, McCoy T, Sandoval B, Nachmani J, et al. Snacking in children: the role of urban corner stores. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1293–8.
Cole M. Culture and cognitive development: From crosscultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Cult Psychol. 1995;1:25–54.
Mantovani G. Exploring Borders. Rootledge, London: Understanding Culture and Psychology; 2000.
Wilson JF. Lunch eating behavior of preschool children. Effects of age, gender, and type of beverage served. Physiol Behav. 2000;70:27–33.
Cecil JE, Palmer CN, Wrieden W, Murrie I, Bolton-Smith C, Watt P, et al. Energy intakes of children after preloads: adjustment, not compensation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:302–8.
Forman J, Halford JC, Summe H, MacDougall M, Keller KL. Food branding influences ad libitum intake differently in children depending on weight status. Results of a pilot study. Appetite. 2009;53:76–83.
Best CA, Yim H, Sloutsky VM. The cost of selective attention in category learning: Developmental differences between adults and infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013;116:105–19.
Contributions
DG and AG: Designed the study; IB, AH and SB: Wrote the manuscript; HP, MK, IB and DG: Performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to results interpretation, read and approved the final manuscript. DG will act as guarantor for this paper.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Source of Funding
This work is partially supported by an unrestricted grant from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Directorate General for Country Promotion, and from Prochild ONLUS (Italy).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gregori, D., Gulati, A., Hochdorn, A. et al. Food Packaged with Toys: An Investigation on Potential Obesogenic Effects in Indian Children. Indian J Pediatr 81 (Suppl 1), 30–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1448-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1448-x