Skip to main content
Log in

Food Packaged with Toys: An Investigation on Potential Obesogenic Effects in Indian Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate, in a large pan Indian sample of school children, whether gadgets (toys) added to food increase food consumption, and if contemporary exposure to TV and/or advertising is a further promoting factor.

Methods

A total of 1,680 Indian children were first randomized to food exposure with or without toy and then to a five-level exposure to TV viewing and advertising according to a 2 × 5 full factorial ad libitum eating design study. The sample size was computed to detect a difference of 20 Kcal of caloric intake (assuming the same standard deviation of 20 Kcal in both groups) between “food with gadget” (Toy) and “food alone” (No Toy) groups in each level of the exposure to TV and advertising factor, given an alpha error equal to 0.05 and a power of 0.90.

Results

Mean caloric intake both in “Toy” and “No Toy” group was around 223 Kcal. When considering exposure to TV and advertising, mean values varied negligibly between 222 and 225 Kcal. According to linear models for the effect of gadget and exposure to TV and/or advertising on children’s intake, no significant adjusted associations were found, neither as main effects nor as interactions.

Conclusions

Food consumption by children is not influenced by the presence of added toys, even after adjustment for several potential confounding factors. The city where they live and age significantly influences Indian children’s caloric intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang Y, Chen HJ, Shaikh S, Mathur P. Is obesity becoming a public health problem in India? Examine the shift from under- to overnutrition problems over time. Obes Rev. 2009;10:456–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:3–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kristiansen H, Juliusson PB, Eide GE, Roelants M, Bjerknes R. TV viewing and obesity among Norwegian children: the importance of parental education. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garber AK, Lustig RH. Is fast food addictive? Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011;4:146–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lobstein T, Dibb S. Evidence of a possible link between obesogenic food advertising and child overweight. Obes Rev. 2005;6:203–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandra PS, Abbas S, Palmer R. Are eating disorders a significant clinical issue in urban India? A survey among psychiatrists in Bangalore. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45:443–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuriyan R, Bhat S, Thomas T, VazM KAV. Television viewing and sleep are associated with overweight among urban and semi-urban South Indian children. Nutr J. 2007;6:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Skar M, Villumsen AB, Christensen DL, Petersen JH, Deepa M, Anjana RM, et al. Increased risk of type 2 diabetes with ascending social class in urban South Indians is explained by obesity: The Chennai urban rural epidemiology study (CURES-116). Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:1084–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregori D, Ballali S, Gafare CE, Casella A, Stefanini G, de Sousa AR. Investigating the obesogenic effects of marketing snacks with toys: an experimental study in Latin America. Nutr J. 2013;12:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Astrup A, Bovy MW, Nackenhorst K, Popova AE. Food for thought or thought for food?–a stakeholder dialogue around the role of the snacking industry in addressing the obesity epidemic. Obes Rev. 2006;7:303–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hebebrand J. Putting the greater dimensions of obesity into perspective. Obes Facts. 2010;3:341–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Dea JA. Prevention of child obesity: ’first, do no harm’. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Halford JC, Gillespie J, Brown V, Pontin EE, Dovey TM. Effect of television advertisements for foods on food consumption in children. Appetite. 2004;42:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nederkoorn C, Braet C, Van Eijs Y, Tanghe A, Jansen A. Why obese children cannot resist food: the role of impulsivity. Eat Behav. 2006;7:315–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Temple JL, Legierski CM, Giacomelli AM, Salvy SJ, Epstein LH. Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1121–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Zhang Q. Are American children and adolescents of low socioeconomic status at increased risk of obesity? Changes in the association between overweight and family income between 1971 and 2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:707–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML, Grummer-Strawn LM. Obesity in Latin American women and children. J Nutr. 1998;128:1464–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Monteiro CA, CondeWL PBM. Independent effects of income and education on the risk of obesity in the Brazilian adult population. J Nutr. 2001;131:881S–6S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion to children. A review of the evidence to December 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pepe A, Armenti A. Knowledge building processes in blended learning communities: forum usage evaluation from a participatory framework for distance cooperation. Barcelona: Edulearn; 2009. p. 5075–85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Horvath CW. Measuring television addiction. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2004;48:378–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Otten JJ, Hekler EB, Krukowski RA, Buman MP, Saelens BE, Gardner CD, et al. Food marketing to children through toys: response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kovacic WE, Harbour PJ, Leibowitz J, Rosch JT. Marketing food to children and adolescents: a review of industry expenditures, activities, and self-regulation: a federal trade commission report to congress. Washington DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2008. p. 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yeager K. An ordinance of the board of supervisors of the County of Santa Clara adding chapter XXII of division A18 to the County of Santa Clara ordinance code relating to toys and other incentives with restaurant food. Santa Clara: Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors; 2010. p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peddycord D. Report regarding public health ordinance on childhood obesity. Santa Clara: Public Health Department; 2010. p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. APA. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. WHO. Growth reference data for 5–19 y. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  28. WHO. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. IAP. IAP Growth Charts. Patna: Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Franchin L, Zobec F, Ghidina M, Stefanini G, Berchialla P, Gregori D. Measuring brand awareness as a component of eating habits in children: The development of the IBAI (International Brand Awareness Instrument) Italian version. Prog Nutr. 2012;14:132–40.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bauman Z. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ebrahim S, Kinra S, Bowen L, Andersen E, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lyngdoh T, et al; Indian Migration Study group. The effect of rural-tourban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Borradaile KE, Sherman S, Vander Veur SS, McCoy T, Sandoval B, Nachmani J, et al. Snacking in children: the role of urban corner stores. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cole M. Culture and cognitive development: From crosscultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Cult Psychol. 1995;1:25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mantovani G. Exploring Borders. Rootledge, London: Understanding Culture and Psychology; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson JF. Lunch eating behavior of preschool children. Effects of age, gender, and type of beverage served. Physiol Behav. 2000;70:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cecil JE, Palmer CN, Wrieden W, Murrie I, Bolton-Smith C, Watt P, et al. Energy intakes of children after preloads: adjustment, not compensation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:302–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Forman J, Halford JC, Summe H, MacDougall M, Keller KL. Food branding influences ad libitum intake differently in children depending on weight status. Results of a pilot study. Appetite. 2009;53:76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Best CA, Yim H, Sloutsky VM. The cost of selective attention in category learning: Developmental differences between adults and infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013;116:105–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributions

DG and AG: Designed the study; IB, AH and SB: Wrote the manuscript; HP, MK, IB and DG: Performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to results interpretation, read and approved the final manuscript. DG will act as guarantor for this paper.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

This work is partially supported by an unrestricted grant from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Directorate General for Country Promotion, and from Prochild ONLUS (Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Gregori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gregori, D., Gulati, A., Hochdorn, A. et al. Food Packaged with Toys: An Investigation on Potential Obesogenic Effects in Indian Children. Indian J Pediatr 81 (Suppl 1), 30–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1448-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1448-x

Keywords

Navigation