Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Stature from Upper Arm Length in Children Aged 4.0 to 6.92 y in Merida, Yucatan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To understand age-sex variation of stature and upper arm length (UAL) and to estimate stature from UAL through prediction equations.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was undertaken in 2006–2007 among 458 children (218 boys and 240 girls) aged 4.0 to 6.92 y of south Merida in Yucatan, Mexico.

Results

The results show significant age variation (p < 0.001) of stature and upper arm length (UAL) in children. Boys show significantly higher mean stature and UAL compared to the girls. Relative proportion of upper arm length to stature is greater in boys. Interrelationship between stature and upper arm length exhibits significant association with respect to age and sex of children. Reconstruction of stature from upper arm length through regression analysis also gives good prediction models for separate and combined samples of both sexes with age. Regression coefficients for UAL predicting stature account for 0.90 or greater variance in the dependent variable (stature). The difference between reconstructed stature and the actual measurement is less than ±2.00 cm.

Conclusions

UAL appears to be a reliable indicator to estimate stature in children aged 4.0 to 6.92 y old.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarzem OF, Gledhill RB. Predicting height from arm measurements. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13:761–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozaslan A, Koc S, Ozaslan I, et al. Estimation of stature from upper extremity. Mil Med. 2006;171:288–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrahamyan DO, Gazarian A, Braillon PM. Estimation of stature and length of limb segments in children and adolescents from whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:311–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salles AD, Carvalho CRF, Silva DM, Santana LA. Reconstruction of humeral length from measurements of its proximal and distal fragments. J Morphol Sci. 2009;26:55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc R Soc of Lond. 1896–1897;60:489–98.

  6. Pearson K. Mathematical contribution to the theory of evolution on the reconstruction of the stature of prehistoric races. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 1898;192:169–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kodagoda N, Jayasinghe S. A preliminary test of Pearson’s formula for estimation of height of Sri Lankans. Forensic Sci Int. 1988;36(3–4):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith SL. Stature estimation of 3-10-year-old children from long bone lengths. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:538–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krishan K, Kanchan T, DiMaggio JA. A study of limb asymmetry and its effect on estimation of stature in forensic case work. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;200:181.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardoso HF. A test of three methods for estimating stature from immature skeletal remains using long bone lengths. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishan K. Determination of stature from foot and its segments in a north Indian population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishan K, Kumar R. Determination of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions in a North Indian population. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2007;9:128–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishan K, Sharma A. Estimation of stature from dimensions of hands and feet in a North Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007;14:327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishan K, Sharma JC. Intra-individual difference between recumbent length and stature among growing children. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69:565–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Celbis O, Agritmis H. Estimation of stature and determination of sex from radial and ulnar bone lengths in a Turkish corpse sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;158:135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarojini Devi H, Das BK, Pumabati S, Singh D, Jayashree D. Estimation of stature from upper arm length among Marings of Manipur. Indian Med J. 2006;100:271–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han TS, Lean ME. Lower leg length as an index of stature in adults. Int J Obes Rel Met Disord. 1996;20:21–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalte PM, Bansal PC. Determination of regression formulae for reconstruction of stature from long bones of upper limbs in Maharashtrians and Marathwara region. J Anat Soc India. 1974;23:6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mall G, Hubig M, Buttner A, et al. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;117:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mall G, Hubig M, Buttner A, Kuznik J, Penning R, Graw M. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. J Forensic Sci. 2001;117:23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akman SD, Karakas P, Gülhal BM. The morphometric measurements of humerus segments. Turk J Med Sci. 2006;36:81–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grivas TB, Dounis E, Kyritsis G, et al. Foot length in children 2–12 years old in Athens. Latriki. 1987;51:501–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grivas TB, Mihas C, Arapaki A, Vasiliadis E. Correlation of foot length with height and weight in school age children. J Forensic Legal Med. 2008;15:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang S, et al. Assessment of growth from foot length in Taiwanese neonates. Pediatr Neonatol. 2009;50:287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. Worldwide variation in human growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bogin B, Kapell M, Varela Silva MI, Orden AB, Smith PK, Loucky J. How genetic are human body proportions? In: Dasgupta P, Hauspie R, editors. Perspectives in human growth, development and maturation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2001. p. 205–21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bogin B, Varela-Silva MI. Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:1047–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vashisht RN, Krishan K, Devlal S. Physical growth and nutritional status of Garhwali girls. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:573–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murguía RE. Diferenciación social de la proporcionalidad corporal. México, D F, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. 1981. (Unpublished thesis).

  30. Ramos Rodríguez RM. Crecimiento y proporcionalidad corporal en adolescentes mexicanos. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bogin B, Smith PK, Orden AB, Varela Silva MI, Loucky J. Rapid change in height and body proportions of Maya American children. Am J Hum Biol. 2002;14:753–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dickinson F, García A, Pérez S. Social differentiation and urban segregation in a Mexican regional metropolis. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1999. p. 345–58.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Azcorra H, Dickinson F, Rothenberg SJ. Family migration and physical growth in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Am J Hum Biol. 2009;21:398–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champagne: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frisancho AR. Anthropometric Standards: an interactive nutritional reference of body size and body composition for children and adults. USA: The University of Michigan Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee RD, Nieman DC. Nutritional assessment. New York: McGraw Hill; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Muñoz JI, Linares-Iglesias M, Suarez-Penaranda JM, et al. Stature estimation from radiographically determined long bone length in a Spanish population sample. J Forensic. 2001;46:363–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present paper is based on an investigation headed by one of the authors (FD) . The authors thankfully acknowledge the help extended by Paloma Pérez and Mayra Vera during fieldwork and data collection, and valuable suggestions made by Dr. Luis A. Rodriguez Carvajal of Faculty of Mathematics, UADY at the time of preparation of the manuscripts.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Role of Funding Source

The study is funded by Cinvestav.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudip Datta Banik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Datta Banik, S., Azcorra, H., Valentín, G. et al. Estimation of Stature from Upper Arm Length in Children Aged 4.0 to 6.92 y in Merida, Yucatan. Indian J Pediatr 79, 640–646 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-011-0580-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-011-0580-0

Keywords

Navigation