Hypoxemia is the result of alveolar hypoventilation (with increased CO2) and altered ventilation/perfusion ratio. It is treated by increasing oxygen concentration and recruiting airspaces. Positive pressure improves tidal volume, gas exchange, respiratory frequency, and diaphragm activity in both chronic respiratory failure [4–6] and acute lung injury [7], proportionate to the level of applied pressure.
In 1996, Meduri et al. [8] concluded that utilization of NIV in clinical practice is a safe and an effective alternative to endotracheal intubation in hemodynamically stable patients with hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure.
As Nasal Bubble CPAP (NBCPAP) was first developed for use in premature infants, most of the literature on nasal bubble CPAP pertains to its use in this specialist group. Since 1987, when nasal bubble CPAP was found to reduce the rate of chronic lung disease in premature infants [9], ongoing studies have found nasal bubble CPAP to be a simple inexpensive therapy that decreases respiratory fatigue in premature infants, thereby playing a valuable role in weaning from positive pressure ventilation [10, 11].
The literature discussing the use of nasal bubble CPAP in infants with bronchiolitis is scarce. Soong et al. [12] studied 10 infants with bronchiolitis and impending respiratory failure in a non-randomized study. They reported improvement in symptoms, signs and physiologic parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, PaCO2 and oxygenation index) after 2 h of CPAP via double nasal prongs.
NBCPAP has not been used so far in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to acute lung injury (ALI) under pandemic H1N1 scenario. ALI is defined as acute onset, severe arterial hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 between 200–300), bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and no evidence of left atrial hypertension [13].
CPAP is achieved using a conventional ventilator or CPAP driver, whereas in Bubble CPAP,the positive pressure is achieved by keeping the efferent limb of the exhale tubing under water and the gas flow adjusted to maintain constant bubbling. The depth of the exhale tubing under water determines the amount of CPAP applied to the system.
The present study shows that both infants and children upto 5 years with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure are able to tolerate indigenous NB-CPAP and gives evidence of clinical and laboratory improvement. Another major feature of NB-CPAP is easy installation of non-invasive support, before respiratory muscle fatigue sets in and atelectasis appears. Indigenous assembly of NB-CPAP costs only Rs 250/- for the circuit as compared to Rs 5 lakhs from commercial Bubble CPAP. It is tolerated well by infants and children.
There are descriptive series of pediatric patients with pneumonia and asthma responding to bilevel face mask pressure [14, 15]. In a descriptive trial of 42 patients with NIV, however, only 10 of 18 patients with pneumonia and bronchiolitis responded to positive pressure, which was administered to young infants through a nasal mask [16].
A prospective randomized crossover study suggests that Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure/Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure for 2 h can be effective in patients with lower airway obstruction by reducing respiratory effort [17]. In the authors’ view, patient’s response is dependent on adequate application of inspiratory and expiratory pressure to obtain alveolar opening and counteract intrinsic positive end expiratory pressure, thus, reducing the respiratory effort and also preventing fatigue and need for intubation.
The present indigenous NBCPAP circuit, being at the patient’s bedside, plays a major role to ensure appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure level, avoids triggering respiratory effort, and ensures patient comfort with respiratory muscles at rest.
In the present series, no patient needed intubation. One of the reasons might be the degree of hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2) being in ALI range (<300) rather than ARDS (<200) range. There was sustained oxygenation in the first 6 h with less lung damage and reduced respiratory fatigue.
Unlike the complications seen by Yanez LJ et al. [18], Fortenberry et al. [14] and Padman et al. [15] with use of nasal prongs or facial mask to deliver CPAP, the present series did not show any such problem. No gastric distension was found in this series as the pressure applied did not exceed the opening pressure of the inferior esophageal pressure [19]. None of the patients died. Unlike other series using CPAP, the authors’ included no patient with chronic disease [14–16] and sought to show that early management of acute respiratory failure seems to prevent such outcome.