Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

can the special care neonatal unit admission cut-off be lowered down to 1500g babies?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The study was conducted to find out whether there is any significant difference in outcome if low birth weight babies weighing between 1500g and 1800g are managed by keeping them with their mothers, i.e., without special care neonatal unit (SCNU) admission.

Methods

It was a retrospective study for which data was collected from past medical record section of 6 months duration from 01.07.06 to 31.12.06, Medical College, Kolkata. The subject of the study was babies born with weight between 1500g and 2000g, divided into 2 groups. Group A representing babies born between weight 1500g and 1800g, groups B representing babies born between 1801g and 2000g. The groups were compared with regard to four variable namely average material age, sex of the babies, singleton or twin pregnancy, mode of delivery and gestational maturity. Test of one proportion was used for statistical analysis of outcome.

Results

Total number of live born babies in group A were 198 and in group B 223. Two group were comparable with respect to average maternal age (23.7 yr), sex distribution, singleton or twin pregnancy and number of cesarian section or vaginal delivery and proportion of small for gestational age (SGA) babies. In both the group 13 babies required SCNU admission after being given to their mothers in the postnatal ward. No significant difference in outcome was observed between the groups.

Conclusion

We conclude that the recommended guidelines for giving institutional care to babies below 1800g may be lowered down to 1500g. However, more babies should be evaluated prospectively, over a longer duration of time, before changing the standard guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tudehope DI, Lee W, Harris F, Addison F. Cost analysis of neonatal intensive and special care. Aus Paediatr J 1989; 1989: 61–65.

  2. National Neonatology Forum guidelines, NNF India, 1998.

  3. Bhutta AZ, Khan I, Salat S, Raja F. Reducing length of stay in hospital for very low birth weight infants by involving mothers in stepdown unit. BMJ 2004; 329:1151–1155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Melnyk BM, Alpert-Gillis L, Feinstein NF, Fairbanks E, Schultz-Czarniak J. Improving cognitive development of low-birth-weight premature infants with the COPE program: a pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. Res Nurs Health, 2001; 24: 373–389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melnyk BM, Feinstein NF, Alpert-Gillis L, Fairbanks E, Crean HF. Reducing premature infants’ length of stay and improving parents’ mental health outcomes with the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) neonatal intensive care unit program: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e1414–e1427. Epub 2006 Oct 16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zahr L. Correlates of mother-infant interaction in premature infants from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Pediatr Nurs 1991; 17: 259–264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman R, Eidelman AI, Sirota L, Weller A. Comparison of skin-to-skin (kangaroo) and traditional care: parenting outcomes and preterm infant development. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karan S, Rao SS Benefits of early maternal participation in care of lowbirth weight infants leading to early discharge. J Trop Paediatr 1983; 29: 115–118.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daga SR, Shinde SB. Mothers involvement in neonatal intensive care and its impact. J Trop Paediatr 1987; 33:274–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Colona F, Uxa F, da Graca AM et al The kangaroo mother method:the evaluation of an alternative method for care of low birth weight newborns in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990; 31: 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manzoor A Arif, Khuram Arif. Low birth weight babies in third world: maternal nursing versus professional nursing care. J Trop Paediatr 1999; 45:278–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Medical College, Kolkata, India

    Ipsita Roy Goswami, Jayant K Ghosh, Malay K Sinha, Hosenara Begum & Sukanta Chatterjee

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Medical College Kolkata, 88 College Street, Kolkata, 700063, India

    Ipsita Roy Goswami

Authors
  1. Ipsita Roy Goswami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jayant K Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malay K Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hosenara Begum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sukanta Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ipsita Roy Goswami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goswami, I.R., Ghosh, J.K., Sinha, M.K. et al. can the special care neonatal unit admission cut-off be lowered down to 1500g babies?. Indian J Pediatr 76, 937–939 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0185-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0185-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation