Abstract
Objective
To examine the effectiveness and cost of implementing a noise reduction protocol in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Methods
A prospective longitudinal study was done in a level III NICU, wherein a noise reduction protocol that included behavioral and environmental modification was implemented. The noise levels were measured sequentially every hour for 15 days before and after this intervention. The statistical significance of the reduction in noise levels after implementation of the protocol was tested by paired sample student’s t-test. Cost was calculated using the generalized cost effectiveness model of the World Health Organisation. The present study has 80 % power with 95 % confidence to measure 2 dB differences between groups for the maximum recommended of 50 dB.
Results
The protocol in the present study reduced noise levels in all the rooms of the NICU to within 60 dB with high statistical significance (p< 0.001). The extent of noise reduction in the rooms of the NICU was as follows: ventilator room by 9.58 dB (95 % confidence interval: 6.73–12.42, p < 0.001), stable room by 6.54 dB (95 % confidence interval: 2.92–4.16, p < 0.001), isolation room by 2.26 dB (95 % confidence interval: 1.21–3.30, p < 0.001), pre-term room by 2.37 dB(95 % confidence interval: 1.22–3.51, p < 0.001) and extreme preterm room by 2.09 dB (95 % confidence interval: 1.14–3.02, p < 0.001). The intervention was most cost-effective in the ventilator room, requiring Rs. 81.09 to reduce 1 dB and least effective in the extreme pre-term room requiring Rs. 371.61 to reduce 1 dB.
Conclusion
The high efficacy and affordability of noise reduction protocols justify the need for implementation of these measures as a standard of care in neonatal intensive care units.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
White RD. Recommended standards for newborn ICU design. J Perinatology 2003; 23: 5–21.
Johnson AN. Neonatal response to control of noise inside the incubator. Pediatr Nurs 2001; 27: 600–605.
Chang EF, Michael MM. Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development. Science 2003; 300: 498–502.
Slevin M, Farrington N, Duffy G, Daly L, Murphy JF. Altering the NICU and measuring infant’s responses. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 577–581.
Gupta V, Soodan KS, Gupta G, Sondhi V, Nair MNG. Evaluation of sound pressure level in NICU. J Neonatology 2005; 19: 155–159.
Livera MD, Priya B, Ramesh A, Suman Rao PN, Srilakshmi V, Nagapoornima M et al. Spectral analysis of noise in the neonatal intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr 2008; 75: 217–222.
Nagapoornima P, Ramesh A, Srilakshmi V, Suman Rao PN, Madhuri Gore, M Dominic et al. Universal Hearing Screening. Indian J Pediatr 2007; 74: 545–549.
Estimating costs in World Health Organisation guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. In Tan-TorresEdejer T, Battussen R, Adams T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB and Murray CJL eds, World Health Organisaton, Geneva 2003: 29–48.
Robertson A, Kohn J, Vos P, Cooper-Peel C. Establishing a noise measurement protocol for neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 126–130.
Robertson A, Cooper-Peel C, Vos, P. Peak noise distribution in the neonatal intensive care nursery. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 361–364.
Kent WD, Tan AK, Clarke MC, Bardell T. Excessive noise levels in the neonatal ICU: potential effects on the auditory system development. J Otolaryngol 2002; 31: 355–360.
Nzama NP, Nolte AG, Dorfling CS. Noise in a neonatal unit: guidelines for the reduction or prevention of noise. Curationis 1995; 18: 16–21.
Kim J, Lee JK. Broadband transmission and noise reduction of smart panels featuring piezoelectric shunt circuits and sound absorbing material. J Acoustic Soc Am 20; 112: 990–998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramesh, A., Suman Rao, P.N., Sandeep, G. et al. Efficacy of a low cost protocol in reducing noise levels in the neonatal intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr 76, 475–478 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0066-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0066-5