Skip to main content
Log in

Use of skin-fold thickness in Sri Lankan children: Comparison of several prediction equations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

There are many prediction equations available in the literature for the assessment of body composition from skinfold thickness (SFT). This study aims to cross validate some of those prediction equations to determine the suitability of their use on Sri Lankan children.

Methods

Height, weight and SFT of 5 different sites were measured. Total body water was assessed using the isotope dilution method (D2O). Percentage Fat mass (%FM) was estimated from SFT using prediction equations described by five authors in the literature.

Results

Five to 15 year old healthy, 282 Sri Lankan children were studied. The equation of Brook gave Ihe lowest bias but limits of agreement were high. Equations described by Deurenberg et al gave slightly higher bias but limits of agreement were narrowest and bias was not influence by extremes of body fat. Although prediction equations did not estimate %FM adequately, the association between %FM and SFT measures, were quite satisfactory.

Conclusion

We conclude that SFT can be used effectively in the assessment of body composition in children. However, for the assessment of body composition using SFT, either prediction equations should be derived to suit the local populations or existing equations should be cross-validated to determine the suitability before its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Durnin JVGA, De Bruin H, Feunekes GIJ. Skinfold thickness: Is there a need to be very precise in their location? Bri J Nutr 1997; 77:3–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Revised standards for triceps and subscapular skinfolds in British children. Arch Dis Child 1975; 50: 12–145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McDowell MA, Fryar CD, Hirsch R, Ogden CL. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: US population 1999–2002. Advance data from vital and health statistics. CDC, NCHS 2005, No 361.

  4. Brook CGD. Determination of body composition of children from skinfold measurements. Arch Dis Child 1971; 46: 182–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarria A, Garcia-Llop LA, Moreno LA, Fleta J, Morellon MP, Bueno M. Skinfold thickness measurements and better predictors of body fat percentage than body mass index in male Spanish children and adolescents. EurJ Clin Nutr 1998;52: 573–576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deurenberg P, Pieters JJL, Hautvast JGAJ. The assessment of the body fat percentage by skinfold thickness measurements in childhood and young adolescence. Bri J Nutr 1990; 63:293–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Horswill CA, Stillman RJ, Van Loan MD et al. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 1988; 60: 709–723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harsha DW, Voors AW, Berenson GS. Racial differences in subcutaneous fat patterns in children aged 7–15 years. Am J Phys Aanthropol 1980; 53: 333–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Janz KF, Nielsen DH, Cassady SL, Cook JS, Wu Y, Hansen JR. corss-validation of the Slaughter skinfold equations for children and adolescents. Med Sci Sport and Exer 1993; 25:1070–1076.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reilly JJ, Wilson J, Durnin JVGA). Determination of body composition from skinfold thickness: a validation study. Arch Dis Child 1995; 73: 305–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wickramasinghe VP, Cleghorn GJ, Edmiston KA, Davies PSW. Impact of ethnicity upon body composition assessment in Sri Lankan Australian Children. J Paed Child Health 2005; 41:101–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell NA, McClure PD, Hill RJ, Davies PSW. Assessment of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance for the prediction of total body water. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: 856–859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoeller DA. Hydrometry. In Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, eds. Human Body Composition. ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, 1996; 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison GG, Buskirk ER, Carter JEL et al. Skinfold thickness and measurement technique. In Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorella R, eds. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL. 1988; 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Owen GM. Measurement, recording and assessment of skinfold thickness in children and adolescence: report of a small meeting. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 35: 629–638.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan T, Xin C, Sun Y et al. Study of body composition and obesity definition of children and adolescents. Chinese J Prevent Med 1987; 21: 172–3. In Li Y, Ma G, Ahang Q, Du W, Pan H. validity of body fat percentage using skinfold measurements in 12–14 year old Chinese boys and girls. Int J Body Comp Res 2003; 1: 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8476: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davies PSW. Body composition assessment. Arch Dis Child 1994; 69: 337–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vithanage P. Wickramasinghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wickramasinghe, V.P., Lamabadusuriay, S.P., Cleghorn, G.J. et al. Use of skin-fold thickness in Sri Lankan children: Comparison of several prediction equations. Indian J Pediatr 75, 1237–1242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-008-0227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-008-0227-y

Key words

Navigation