Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available.
Methods
The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
Results
There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events.
Conclusion
TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data used in this study were provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Change history
03 August 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03293-4
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
Ciardiello F, Ciardiello D, Martini G, Napolitano S, Tabernero J, Cervantes A. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:372–401. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21728.
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, Arnold D, Normanno N, Taïeb J, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:10–32. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21728.
Boukouris AE, Theochari M, Stefanou D, Felekouras E, Gogas H, Ziogas DC. Latest evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: a 2022 update. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;173:103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103663.
Singh P, Waghambare P, Khan TA, Omri A. Colorectal cancer management: strategies in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:653–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2022.2084531.
Fan A, Wang B, Wang X, Nie Y, Fan D, Zhao X, et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: current achievements and future perspective. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(14):3837–49. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.64077.
Yoshino T, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K, Nishina T, Komatsu Y, Baba H, et al. TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;13:993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70345-5.
Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, Yoshino T, Garcia-Carbonero R, Mizunuma N, et al. RECOURSE Study Group. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909–19. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414325.
Van Cutsem E, Mayer RJ, Laurent S, Winkler R, Grávalos C, Benavides M, et al. The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2019;90:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.009.
Xu J, Kim TW, Shen L, Sriuranpong V, Pan H, Xu R, et al. Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) monotherapy in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the TERRA study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(4):350–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3245.
Weiss L, Karthaus M, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Kretzschmar A, Welslau M, Vehling-Kaiser U, et al. TALLISUR study group. Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial. ESMO Open. 2022;7(1):100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100391.
Emura T, Suzuki N, Yamaguchi M, Ohshimo H, Fukushima M. A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol. 2004;25(3):571–8.
van der Velden DL, Opdam FL, Voest EE. TAS-102 for treatment of advanced colorectal cancers that are no longer responding to other therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):2835–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2783.
Chen D, Wu YS, Lin H, Wang Y, Li L, Zhang T. Efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2915–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S174584.
Yoshino T, Cleary JM, Van Cutsem E, Mayer RJ, Ohtsu A, Shinozaki E, et al. Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.005.
Pietrantonio F, Fucà G, Manca P, Pagani F, Raimondi A, Prisciandaro M, et al. Validation of the colon life nomogram in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer enrolled in the RECOURSE trial. Tumori. 2021;107(4):353–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891620960808.
Cheung WY, Kavan P, Dolley A. Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. Curr Oncol. 2020;27(5):e451–8. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6533. (Epub 2020 Oct 1).
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.
Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Robertson J, Peterson J, Welch V, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics. 2014.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.
de Haes JC, van Knippenberg FC, Neijt JP. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam symptom checklist. Br J Cancer. 1990;62:1034–8.
Colwell HH, Mathias SD, Turner MP, Lu J, Wright N, Peeters M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the FACT colorectal cancer symptom index (FCSI-9): reliability, validity, responsiveness, and clinical meaningfulness. Oncologist. 2010;15:308–16. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0034.
Leowattana W, Leowattana P, Leowattana T. Systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29:1569–88.
Shin AE, Giancotti FG, Rustgi AK. Metastatic colorectal cancer: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2023;44:222–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2023.01.003.
Xie YH, Chen YX, Fang JY. Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0116-z.
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627.
Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, O’Day S, Weber J, Garbe C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2517–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1104621.
Weng J, Li S, Zhu Z, Liu Q, Zhang R, Yang Y, et al. Exploring immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01294-4.
Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X.
Bachet JB, Wyrwicz L, Price T, Cremolini C, Phelip JM, Portales F, et al. Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study. ESMO Open. 2020;5:e000698. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000698.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81860104) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang autonomous Region (No. 2017GXNSFAA198299).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL was responsible for the conception and design of the study. FH contributed to the literature research, analysis and interpretation of data for the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. HY, WB, YB, SZ and MW contributed to the collection and assembly of data. All gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access cancellation.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, F., Yang, H., Bao, W. et al. Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 26, 468–476 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03268-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03268-5