Abstract
Background
To reach a consensus on recommendations for the management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer by a group of Radiation Oncologists in Catalonia dedicated to prostate cancer.
Methods
A modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus on controversial topics in Radiation Oncology on high-risk non-metastatic (eight questions) and post-operative (eight questions) prostate cancer. An agreement of at least 75% was considered as consensus. The survey was electronically sent 6 weeks before an expert meeting where topics were reviewed and discussed. A second-round survey for the controversial questions only was sent and answered by participants after the meeting.
Results
After the first round of the survey, 19 experienced Radiation Oncologists attended the meeting and 74% fulfilled the second-round online questionnaire. An agreement of 9 of the 16 questions was accounted for the first round. After the meeting, an additional agreement was reached in 3 questions leading to a final consensus on 12 of the 16 questions. There are still controversial topics like the use of PET for staging of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer and the optimal dose to the prostate bed in the salvage setting.
Conclusion
This consensus contributes to establish recommendations and a framework to help in prostate cancer radiation therapy and pharmacological management in daily clinical practice of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Las cifras del cáncer en España 2022. Available at: https://seom.org/images/LAS_CIFRAS_DEL_CANCER_EN_ESPANA_2022.pdf . Las consulted on 25th july 2022.
Barrett D, Heale R. What are Delphi studies? Evid Based Nurs. 2020;23:68–9.
Redondo A, Oaknin A, Rubio MJ, Barretina-Ginesta M-P, de Juan A, Manso L, et al. Management of advanced ovarian cancer in Spain: an expert Delphi consensus. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14:72.
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Prostate Cancer. Version 1.23. 2022.
Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, Chen RC, Crispino T, Fontanarosa J, et al. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options. J Urol. 2018;199:683–90.
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–16.
Bekelman JE, Rumble RB, Chen RC, Pisansky TM, Finelli A, Feifer A, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline endorsement of an American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3251–8.
Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin A-G, Bahary J-P, Lemaire C, Vass S, et al. Duration of androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized phase III trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74:432–41.
Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, Cross W, Jones RJ, Parker CC, et al. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022;399:447–60.
Roach M, Moughan J, Lawton CAF, Dicker AP, Zeitzer KL, Gore EM, et al. Sequence of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy field size in unfavourable, localised prostate cancer (NRG/RTOG 9413): long-term results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2018;19:1504–15. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S147020451830528X
Pommier P, Chabaud S, Lagrange JL, Richaud P, Lesaunier F, Le Prise E, et al. Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? preliminary results of GETUG-01. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5366–73.
Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, Panigrahi G, Krishnatry R, Bakshi G, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1234–42.
Ventimiglia E, Seisen T, Abdollah F, Briganti A, Fonteyne V, James N, et al. A systematic review of the role of definitive local treatment in patients with clinically lymph node-positive prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2:294–301.
Lieng H, Kneebone A, Hayden AJ, Christie DRH, Davis BJ, Eade TN, et al. Radiotherapy for node-positive prostate cancer: 2019 Recommendations of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary group. Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:68–75.
Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, Halperin R, Pai H, McKenzie M, et al. Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2017;98:275–85.
Hoskin PJ, Rojas AM, Bownes PJ, Lowe GJ, Ostler PJ, Bryant L. Randomised trial of external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:217–22.
Kishan AU, Cook RR, Ciezki JP, Ross AE, Pomerantz MM, Nguyen PL, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost and disease progression and mortality in patients with gleason score 9–10 prostate cancer. JAMA. 2018;319:896.
Faria S, Ruo R, Perna M, Cury F, Duclos M, Sarshoghi A, et al. Long-term results of moderate hypofractionation to prostate and pelvic nodes plus androgen suppression in high-risk prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:e514–20.
Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, Buyyounouski MK, Patton C, Barocas D, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: An ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3411–30.
Barbato F, Fendler WP, Rauscher I, Herrmann K, Wetter A, Ferdinandus J, et al. PSMA PET for the assessment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer volume of disease. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1747–50.
Emmett L, Tang R, Nandurkar R, Hruby G, Roach P, Watts JA, et al. 3-Year freedom from progression after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT–triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multicenter trial. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:866–72.
Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological t3n0m0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009;181:956–62.
Wiegel T, Bartkowiak D, Bottke D, Bronner C, Steiner U, Siegmann A, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96–02/AUO AP 09/95 trial. Eur Urol. 2014;66:243–50.
Hackman G, Taari K, Tammela TL, Matikainen M, Kouri M, Joensuu T, et al. Randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension. Eur Urol. 2019;76:586–95.
Parker CC, Clarke NW, Cook AD, Kynaston HG, Petersen PM, Catton C, et al. Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1413–21.
Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, Fisher R, Frydenberg M, Herschtal A, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1331–40.
Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, Magné N, Benyoucef A, Supiot S, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1341–52.
Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, Sargos P, Latorzeff I, Lagrange J-L, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1740–9.
Shipley WU, Seiferheld W, Lukka HR, Major PP, Heney NM, Grignon DJ, et al. Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:417–28.
Spratt DE, McHugh DJ, Morris MJ, Morgans AK. Management of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Ensuring the Right Treatment of the Right Patient at the Right Time. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2018;355–62.
Parker CC, Clarke A, Cook A, Catton C, Cross WR, Kynaston H, Logue J, Petersen PM, Neville P, Persad R, Payne H, Saad F, Stirling A, Parulekar WR, Parmar MK, Sydes MR. LBA9 - Duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with post-operative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer: First results of the RADICALS-HD trial (ISRCTN40814031). Ann Oncol. 2022;33:S808–69.
Ghadjar P, Hayoz S, Bernhard J, Zwahlen DR, Hölscher T, Gut P, et al. Dose-intensified versus conventional-dose salvage radiotherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: the SAKK 09/10 randomized phase 3 trial. Eur Urol. 2021;80:306–15.
Acknowledgements
We want to thank the Council of Vila-Sana (Lleida) and IPSEN pharma for its support during the meeting. The authors also want to thank Magda Font and Kathryn Gibson for their language support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.
Informed consent
The manuscript doesn’t involve patients and no experiments on human subjects have been done. An informed consent does not apply for this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bonet, M., González, D., Baquedano, JE. et al. Management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer in Catalonia: an expert Delphi consensus. Clin Transl Oncol 25, 1017–1023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-03005-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-03005-4