Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Peritoneal metastases (PM) have a poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) gives favorable outcomes, but the influence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains contentious. We designed to distinguish results between CRS versus HIPEC-CRS in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library accessed to collect data and language is restricted to English. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform statistical analysis. The outcomes for categorical variables are mentioned in the risk ratio.

Results

Ten trials involving 1367 patients in which 707 were CRS-HIPEC, while 660 CRS. We got significant results in 3rd year survival (P < 0.05), while 1st and 5th years are not statistically significant P > 0.05.

Conclusion

To compare with CRS, CRS-HIPEC has improved survival rate in deprived of further morbidity or mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PM:

Peritoneal metastases

GC:

Gastric cancer

CRS:

Cytoreductive surgery

HIPEC:

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

NRCTs:

Non-randomized controlled trials

CI:

Confidence interval

RR:

Risk ratios

MD:

Mean difference

MMC:

Mitomycin

CDDP:

Cis-Diaminodichloroplatinum

References

  1. G Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed August 10 2016

  2. Coccolini F, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Cima S, Valli MC, Nita GE, et al. Advanced gastric cancer: what we know and what we still have to learn. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(3):1139–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Montori G, Coccolini F, Ceresoli M, Catena F, Colaianni N, Poletti E, et al. The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced gastric cancer: state of the art. Int J Surg Oncol. 2014;2014:912418.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Sloothen GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(20):3737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deraco M, Kusamura S, Virzi S, Puccio F, Macri A, Famulari C, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as upfront therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: multi-institutional phase-II trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(2):215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyashiro I, Furukawa H, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal and intravenous cisplatin followed by oral fluorouracil (UFT) in serosa-positive gastric cancer versus curative resection alone: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial JCOG9206-2. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(3):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0027-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang XJ, Huang CQ, Suo T, Mei LJ, Yang GL, Cheng FL, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: final results of a phase III randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1575–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang LY, Mok KT, Liu SI, Tsai CC, Wang BW, Chen IS, et al. Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients with serosal invasion. J Chin Med Assoc. 2013;76(8):425–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudloff U, Langan RC, Mullinax JE, Beane JD, Steinberg SM, Beresnev T, et al. Impact of maximal cytoreductive surgery plus regional heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on outcome of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: results of the GYMSSA trial. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(3):275–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui HB, Ge HE, Bai XY, Zhang W, Zhang YY, Wang J, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy on advanced gastric cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7(5):1083–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yarema RR, Ohorchak MA, Zubarev GP, Mylyan YP, Oliynyk YY, Zubarev MG, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion in combined treatment of locally advanced and disseminated gastric cancer: results of a single-centre retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014;30(3):159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murata S, Kaida S, Kodama H, Yamamoto H, Yamaguchi T, Ohtake R, Tani M. A propensity-matched analysis comparing hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant HIPEC to surgery alone for advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl. 15):4056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beeharry MK, Zhu ZL, Liu WT, Yao XX, Yan M, Zhu ZG. Erratum: Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 gastrectomy improves survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for locally advanced gastric cancer: Personal experience from a randomized case control study (BMC Cancer (2019) 19 (932) DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6125-z). BMC Cancer BioMed Central Ltd. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6411-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonnot PE, Piessen G, Kepenekian V, Decullier E, Pocard M, Meunier B et al. Cytoreductive Surgery with or without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A propensity score analysis. In Journal of Clinical Oncology (Vol. 37, pp. 2028–2040). Am Soc Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01688.

  15. Reutovich MY, Krasko OV, Sukonko OG. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in serosa-invasive gastric cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(12):2405–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009;374(9688):477–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60617-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Glockzin G, Zeman F, Croner RS, Königsrainer A, Pelz J, Ströhlein MA, et al. Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 COMBATAC Trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(4):285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji ZH, Peng KW, Yu Y, Li XB, Yonemura Y, Liu Y, et al. Current status and future prospects of clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33(5):562–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2017.1283065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I'd like to thank all the authors for their outstanding work and contributions, particularly Chaohui Wang for revision and funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Muhammad Ali and Zhuming Chen write the manuscript and participate in data analysis, while Zhe Kai and Yang Wang helped in data collection under Chaohui Wang supervision and guidance in the manuscript draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaohui Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

The manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Ali, M., Kai, Z. et al. HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum. Clin Transl Oncol 25, 1011–1016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-03004-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-03004-5

Keywords

Navigation