Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients with refractory advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anti-angiogenic agents are reported to exert clinical activity in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the outcomes of the combination of docetaxel plus nintedanib in refractory NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 19 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who had progressed to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and platinum-based chemotherapy receiving docetaxel and nintedanib at 14 Spanish institutions from January 2013 to December 2019. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median age was 58.9 years (range 42.8–81), 73.7% were female. All patients were Caucasian, and 73.7% were never or light smokers. The baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 94.7% of patients. All patients had adenocarcinoma. Brain and liver metastases were present in 47.4% and 31.6% of patients, respectively. The most common EGFR mutations were exon 19 deletion (52.6%) and exon 21 L858R mutation (36.8%); 47.4% patients presented the EGFR T790M. 94.8% of the patients had received 2–3 previous treatment lines.

Docetaxel was administered at 75 mg/m2/3 weeks to 16 patients, at 60 mg/m2 to 2 patients and at 45 mg/m2 to one patient. Nintedanib was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity at 200 mg twice daily except in 2 patients who received 150 mg twice daily and one patient who received 100 mg/12 h.

With a median follow-up of 11.4 months (1–38), the median PFS was 6.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9–7.3] and the median OS 10.1 months (95% CI 5.9–14.3). The objective response rate (ORR) was 44.4% (23.7–66.8%) and the disease control rate (DCR) 72.2% (49.4–88.5%). Efficacy tended to be greater in patients with the acquired T790M who had received osimertinib, with a median PFS of 6.3 (95% CI 2.1–10.5) versus (vs.) 4.8 (95% CI 3.5–6.1) and a median OS of 12.3 months (95% CI 8.6–16.0) vs. 6.7 months (95% CI 3.9–9.4), although this tendency was not statistically significant (p = 0.468 and p = 0.159, respectively).

Sixteen patients (84.2%) had a total of 34 adverse events (AEs), with a median of two (0–6) AEs per patient. The most frequent AEs were asthenia (20.6%) and diarrhea (20.6%). One treatment-related death due to portal thrombosis was reported.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that the combination of docetaxel and nintedanib can be considered to be an effective treatment for EGFR TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig.2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castellanos E, Feld E, Horn L. Driven by mutations: the predictive value of mutation subtype in EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(4):612–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soria J-C, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, et al. Osimertinib in untreated EGFR -mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):113–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, et al. Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1913662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):947–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sequist LV, Yang JC-H, Yamamoto N, et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3327–34. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):121–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70364-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(25):2380–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0909530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(8):735–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Y-L, Zhou C, Liam C-K, et al. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(9):1883–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cross DAE, Ashton SE, Ghiorghiu S, et al. AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(9):1046–61. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang S, Song Y, Yan F, Liu D. Mechanisms of resistance to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Front Med. 2016;10(4):383–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-016-0488-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Ahn M-J, et al. Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M–positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):629–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goss G, Tsai C-M, Shepherd FA, et al. Osimertinib for pretreated EGFR Thr790Met-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AURA2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(12):1643–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30508-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JC-H, Ahn M-J, Kim D-W, et al. Osimertinib in pretreated T790M-positive advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: AURA study phase II extension component. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(12):1288–96. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida T, Kuroda H, Oya Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy according to T790M mutation status in EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients after initial EGFR-TKI failure. Lung Cancer. 2017;109:89–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soria J-C, Wu Y-L, Nakagawa K, et al. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on first-line gefitinib (IMPRESS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):990–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00121-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mok TSK, Kim S-W, Wu Y-L, et al. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer resistant to first-line gefitinib (IMPRESS): overall survival and biomarker analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4027–34. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.9250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakagawa K, Garon EB, Seto T, et al. Ramucirumab plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (RELAY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(12):1655–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30634-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seto T, Kato T, Nishio M, et al. Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1236–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70381-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosell R, Dafni U, Felip E, et al. Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations (BELIEF): an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(5):435–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30129-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reck M, Mok TSK, Nishio M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower150): key subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR mutations or baseline liver metastases in a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(5):387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30084-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):143–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70586-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corral J, Majem M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, et al. Efficacy of nintedanib and docetaxel in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-line chemotherapy and second-line immunotherapy in the nintedanib NPU program. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(9):1270–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02053-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hong SH, An H jung, Kim K, et al. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation on clinical outcomes of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer from the korean named patient program. Oncology. 2019;96(1):51–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events. 2009. Presented at the: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/Archive/CTCAE_4.0_2009-05-29_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  28. Mazieres J, Drilon A, Lusque A, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1321–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JB Research grant/Funding (institution), Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consulting and Advisory: Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim. LC Consulting and Advisory: Angelini, Grunenthal, Kyowa Kirin, Mudipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Rovi, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Ipsen Pharma, Astra Zeneca. PD Consulting and Advisory: Takeda, Roche, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. Expert testimony: Takeda, Roche, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. Lecture speaking: Roche, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Pfizer. Travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche. AH Lecture speaking: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consulting and Advisory: Boehringer Ingelheim, Travel. Accomodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche,Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca. SPo Consulting and Advisory: Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmamar, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS. Expert testimony: Roche, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmamar, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS. Travel, accommodations, expenses: MSD, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Pharmamar. JMS Consulting of Advisory: Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. Travel/Accommodations/Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche. MA Consulting and Advisory: Roche, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer. RB Speaker honoraria from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Merck, Pfizer and Sanofi. Consultant or advisory role for Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca. AI Consulting and Advisory: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Pfizer, Roche. Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim MSD, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca. Travel, accommodations, expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Pfizer, Roche. EG Consulting and Advisory: Hoffmann-La Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim. XM Consulting and Advisory: Boehringer Ingelheim. TM Lecture speaking: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly; Travel, accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly. MM Consulting or Advisory: AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Tesaro, Helsinn Therapeutics, Takeda, Sanofi, Amgen; Research Funding: BMS; Travel, accommodations, Expenses: Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Majem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors contributed equally in the present manuscript. MR no conflict of interest, DR no conflict of interest, RM no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Ethics Committee ( IIBSP-CAP-2021-83).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riudavets, M., Bosch-Barrera, J., Cabezón-Gutiérrez, L. et al. Efficacy of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients with refractory advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 2560–2567 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02661-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02661-2

Keywords

Navigation