Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying a novel 5-gene signature predicting clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia and biologically heterogeneous diseases with poor prognosis. Thus, we aimed to identify prognostic markers to effectively predict the prognosis of AML patients and eventually guide treatment.

Methods

Prognosis-associated genes were determined by Kaplan–Meier and multivariate analyses using the expression and clinical data of 173 AML patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and validated in an independent Oregon Health and Science University dataset. A prognostic risk score was computed based on a linear combination of 5-gene expression levels using the regression coefficients derived from the multivariate logistic regression model. The classification of AML was established by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A, FCHO2 and LRCH4 expression levels.

Results

High FCHO2 and LRCH4 expression was related to decreased mortality. While high CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A expression was associated with increased mortality. The risk score was predictive of increased mortality rate in AML patients. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the five genes discovered three clusters of AML patients. The cluster1 AML patients were associated with lower cytogenetics risk than cluster2 or 3 patients, and better prognosis than cluster3 patients (P values < 0.05 for all cases, fisher exact test or log-rank test).

Conclusion

The gene panel comprising CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A, FCHO2 and LRCH4 as well as the risk score may offer novel prognostic biomarkers and classification of AML patients to significantly improve outcome prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Estey E, Döhner H. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2006;368:1894–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21254/pdf

  3. Shah A, Andersson TML, Rachet B, Björkholm M, Lambert PC. Survival and cure of acute myeloid leukaemia in England, 1971–2006: a population-based study. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:509–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyers J, Yu Y, Kaye JA, Davis KL. Medicare fee-for-service enrollees with primary acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare resource utilization and costs. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11:275–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-013-0032-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mrózek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD. Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev. 2004;18:115–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walter MJ, Payton JE, Ries RE, Shannon WD, Deshmukh H, Zhao Y, et al. Acquired copy number alterations in adult acute myeloid leukemia genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12950–5. https://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2716381&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

  7. Bullinger L, Krönke J, Schön C, Radtke I, Urlbauer K, Botzenhardt U, et al. Identification of acquired copy number alterations and uniparental disomies in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia using high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Leukemia. 2010;24:438–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel JP, Gönen M, Figueroa ME, Fernandez H, Sun Z, Racevskis J, et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1079–89. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112304 (Massachusetts Medical Society).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Network TCGAR. Genomic and Epigenomic Landscapes of Adult De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–74. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1301689

  10. Tyner JW, Tognon CE, Bottomly D, Wilmot B, Kurtz SE, Savage SL, et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2018;562:526–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0623-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1–pl1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23550210

  12. Therneau T. Survival Analysis. Cran [Internet]. 2016; https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/survival.pdf

  13. Fox J. Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression for Survival Data The Cox Proportional-Hazards Model. Most. 2002;2008:1–18. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.110.2264&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf

  14. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. BioMed Central Ltd; 2011;12:77. https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77

  15. Consortium Gte. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:580–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23715323

  16. Warnes G, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Huber W, Liaw A, et al. gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R Packag. version. 2005.

  17. Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27895058 (American Society of Hematology)

  18. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciftciler R, Goker H, Buyukasık Y, Malkan UY, Saglam EA. Impact of pre-transplant bone marrow blast percentage on survival in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2019;12:9288–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Chiu Y, Li Y, Lin C, Hou H, Chou W, et al. High Expression of dedicator of Cytokinesis 1 ( DOCK1) Confers Poor Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Oncotarget. 2017;8:72250–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Angenendt L, Bormann E, Pabst C, Alla V, Görlich D, Braun L, et al. The neuropeptide receptor calcitonin receptor-like (CALCRL) is a potential therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2019;33:2830–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0505-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D61–5. https://nar.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkl842

  23. Yang L, Zhang H. Expression of cytosolic phospholipase A2 alpha in glioblastoma is associated with resistance to chemotherapy. Am J Med Sci. 2018;356:391–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2018.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Runarsson G, Feltenmark S, Forsell PKA, Sjöberg J, Björkholm M, Claesson H-E. The expression of cytosolic phospholipase A2 and biosynthesis of leukotriene B4 in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Eur J Haematol. 2007;79:468–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00967.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundarraj S, Kannan S, Thangam R, Gunasekaran P. Effects of the inhibition of cytosolic phospholipase A2α in non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:827–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1157-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parhamifar L, Jeppsson B, Sjölander A. Activation of cPLA2 is required for leukotriene D4-induced proliferation in colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1988–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tajiri H, Uruno T, Shirai T, Takaya D, Matsunaga S, Setoyama D, et al. Targeting ras-driven cancer cell survival and invasion through selective inhibition of DOCK1. Cell Rep. 2017;19:969–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KS designed the study. RP, KS, LC downloaded somatic mutation, RNA-seq data and clinical data from the TCGA and OHSU databases. YL, PZ, RP, XS performed the survival analyses and differentially expressed gene analysis. ZF, LC conducted unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. KS prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Sha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in Tykyo 2004).

Informed consent

All participants have provided written informed consent in this study.

Code availability

The codes in the current study are available upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary file2 Supplementary Figure 1. The overlap of prognosis-associated genes between TCGA and OHSU datasets. A. The overlap of protective type genes between TCGA and OHSU datasets, A. The overlap of risk type genes between TCGA and OHSU datasets. (TIF 1959 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Supplementary file3 Supplementary Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients’ OS with CALCRL (A), DOCK1 (B), FCHO2 (C) and LRCH4 (D) and PLA2G4A (E) expression levels in 405 AML patients of the OHSU dataset. (TIF 1232 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM4_ESM.tif

Supplementary file4 Supplementary Figure 3. The mutation frequencies of DOCK1 (A), FCHO2 (B) and PLA2G4A (C) in the TCGA and OHSU datasets. (TIF 1898 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM5_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file5 Supplementary Figure 4. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the 5-gene panel uncovered three classes of AML patients in the TCGA dataset. (JPEG 1663 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM6_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file6 Supplementary Figure 5. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the 5-gene panel uncovered three classes of AML patients in the OHSU dataset. (JPEG 978 kb)

12094_2020_2460_MOESM7_ESM.tif

Supplementary file7 Supplementary Figure 6. The three clusters of AML patients exhibited significant differences in FLT3-ITD mutation in the OHSU dataset. (TIF 1847 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sha, K., Lu, Y., Zhang, P. et al. Identifying a novel 5-gene signature predicting clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 648–656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02460-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02460-1

Keywords

Navigation