Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Article
Google Scholar
Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, Buys S, Daly MB, Dempsey PJ, Farrar WB, Fleming I, Garber JE, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2009;7:1060–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Groheux D, Hindié E, Giacchetti S, Hamy AS, Berger F, Merlet P, de Roquancourt A, de Cremoux P, Marty M, Hatt M, Espié M. Early assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help predict the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1864–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Piva R, Ticconi F, Ceriani V, Scalorbi F, Fiz F, Capitanio S, Bauckneht M, Cittadini G, Sambuceti G, Morbelli S. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017;9:461–71.
CAS
Google Scholar
Ege Aktas G, Taştekin E, Sarikaya A. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters. Nucl Med Commun. 2018;39:83–93.
Article
Google Scholar
Groheux D, Majdoub M, Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Martineau A, Merlet P, Espié M, de Roquancourt A, Hindié E, Hatt M, Visvikis D. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1682–91.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kim BS, Sung SH. Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:175–83.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Sanli Y, Kuyumcu S, Ozkan ZG, Işik G, Karanlik H, Guzelbey B, Turkmen C, Ozel S, Yavuz E, Mudun A. Increased FDG uptake in breast cancer is associated with prognostic factors. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:345–50.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti JL, Porcher R, Espié M, Lehmann-Che J, de Roquancourt A, Hamy AS, Cuvier C, Vercellino L, Hindié E. Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:426–35.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim YH, Yoon HJ, Kim Y, Kim BS. Axillary lymph node-to-primary tumor standard uptake value ratio on preoperative (18)F-FDGPET/CT: a prognostic factor for invasive ductal breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2015;18:173–80.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, Panel members. Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1736–47.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ulaner GA, Castillo R, Goldman DA, Wills J, Riedl CC, Pinker-Domenig K, Jochelson MS, Gönen M. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for systemic staging of newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1937–44.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H, Shigekawa T, Fukatsu K, Kondo N, Yamamoto M, Hama Y, Tamura K, Ishida J, Abe Y, Mochizuki H. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:250–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen S, Ibrahim NK, Yan Y, Wong ST, Wang H, Wong FC. Risk stratification in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer by pretreatment [(18) F]FDG PET/CT. Cancer. 2015;121:3965–74.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kajáry K, Tőkés T, Dank M, Kulka J, Szakáll S Jr, Lengyel Z. Correlation of the value of 18F-FDG uptake, described by SUVmax, SUVavg, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, to clinicopathological prognostic factors and biological subtypes in breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:28–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaida H, Toh U, Hayakawa M, Hattori S, Fujii T, Kurata S, Kawahara A, Hirose Y, Kage M, Ishibashi M. The relationship between 18F-FDG metabolic volumetric parameters and clinicopathological factors of breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:562–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, Panel members. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2206–23.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Dawood S, Hu R, Homes MD, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Connolly J, Colditz GA, Tamimi RM. Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:185–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Song B, Wang L, Zhang Y, Li N, Dai H, Xu H, Cai H, Yan J. Combined detection of HER2, Ki67, and GSTP1 genes on the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2019;34:85–90.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
García Fernández A, Chabrera C, García Font M, Fraile M, Lain JM, Gónzalez S, Barco I, González C, Torres J, Piqueras M, Cirera L, Veloso E. Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17:238–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Elkablawy MA, Albasri AM, Mohammed RA, Hussainy AS, Nouh MM, Alhujaily AS. Ki67 expression in breast cancer. Correlation with prognostic markers and clinicopathological parameters in Saudi patients. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:137–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen X, He C, Han D, Zhou M, Wang Q, Tian J, Li L, Xu F, Zhou E, Yang K. The predictive value of Ki-67 before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol. 2017;13:843–57.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Tchou J, Sonnad SS, Bergey MR, Basu S, Tomaszewski J, Alavi A, Schnall M. Degree of tumor FDG uptake correlates with proliferation index in triple negative breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:657–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Tőkés T, Somlai K, Székely B, Kulka J, Szentmártoni G, Torgyík L, Galgóczy H, Lengyel Z, Györke T, Dank M. The role of FDG-PET-CT in the evaluation of primary systemic therapy in breast cancer: links between metabolic and pathological remission. Orv Hetil. 2012;153:1958–64.
Article
Google Scholar
Jiménez-Ballvé A, García García-Esquinas M, Salsidua-Arroyo O, Serrano-Palacio A, García-Sáenz JA, Ortega Candil A, Fuentes Ferrer ME, Rodríguez Rey C, Román-Santamaría JM, Moreno F, Carreras-Delgado JL. Prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in 18F-FDG PET/CTscans in locally advanced breast cancer staging. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2016;35:365–72.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Groheux D, Martineau A, Teixeira L, Espié M, de Cremoux P, Bertheau P, Merlet P, Lemarignier C. 18FDG-PET/CT for predicting the outcome in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients: comparison of clinicopathological parameters and PET image-derived indices including tumor texture analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:3.
Article
Google Scholar