Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of urinary and plasma DNA in early breast cancer patients and its links to disease relapse

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Identifying patients who are at risk of relapse is a key challenge of primary breast cancer. The current study investigates the utility of urinary DNA in breast cancer management and as a predictor of relapse. This work also compares the sensitivity of plasma DNA with urinary DNA.

Methods

Blood plasma and urine specimens were collected concurrently from 200 breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison of both plasma and urinary DNA was performed at baseline to determine assay significance. Serial measurements of urinary DNA were conducted to gauge DNA variations after surgery. Correlations to disease relapse were performed to affirm the clinical utility of urinary DNA.

Results

Molecular analysis showed patients were successfully identified with mutant PIK3CA using urinary DNA. A strong correlation was affirmed from urinary and plasma DNA at baseline with the correlation coefficient r = 0.859. We analyzed post-surgery measurements of urinary DNA for disease-relapse predictions. In subsequent serial followup of urinary DNA samples, we confirmed increased sensitivity in predicting relapse of these patients. The hazard ratio determined at the 9-month was 1.51 that identified patients at greater risk of disease relapse.

Conclusion

Urinary DNA offers a unique opportunity to glimpse upon dynamic changes in early breast cancer. Our results demonstrated good correlation to plasma DNA and post monitoring of cancer patients to identify individuals susceptible to a high risk of relapse. This potentially allows for early intervention such as adjuvant chemotherapy to be administered to better manage these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LAG et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. JNCI. 2014;106(5):dju55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brackstone M, Townson JL, Chambers AF. Tumour dormancy in breast cancer: an update. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(3):208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Diaz LA Jr, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(6):579–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J. Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology. 2010;257(3):674–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Imaging in the era of molecular oncology. Nature. 2008;452(7187):580.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early-and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(224):224ra24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, et al. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;2004(351):781–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch R-D, et al. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Can Res. 2001;61(4):1659–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Allard WJ, Matera J, Miller MC, Repollet M, Connelly MC, Rao C, et al. Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(20):6897–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maheswaran S, Haber DA. Circulating tumor cells: a window into cancer biology and metastasis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010;20(1):96–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Gregory SG, Garcia-Blanco MA, Armstrong AJ. Using circulating tumor cells to inform on prostate cancer biology and clinical utility. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(4):191–210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnamurthy N, Spencer E, Torkamani A, Nicholson L. Liquid biopsies for cancer: coming to a patient near you. J Clin Med. 2017;6(1):3.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smerage JB, Hayes DF. The measurement and therapeutic implications of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson E, Winter C, George A, Chen Y, Howlin J, Tang MHE, et al. Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with primary breast cancer for detection of occult metastatic disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7(8):1034–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagrath S, Sequist LV, Maheswaran S, Bell DW, Irimia D, Ulkus L, et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature. 2007;450(7173):1235–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(8):627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cidado J, Park BH. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway for breast cancer therapy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplas. 2012;17(3–4):205–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma CX. The PI3K pathway as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Am J Hematol Oncol®. 2015;11(3):23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takeshita T, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto-Ibusuki M, Inao T, Sueta A, Fujiwara S, et al. Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutations of cell-free DNA in early-stage triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2015;106(11):1582–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singletary SE, Greene FL, editors. Revision of breast cancer staging: the 6th edition of the TNM classification 2003: Wiley Online Library.

  22. Yokota M, Tatsumi N, Tsuda I, Takubo T, Hiyoshi M. DNA extraction from human urinary sediment. J Clin Lab Anal. 1998;12(2):88–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brinkmann B, Rand S, Bajanowski T. Forensic identification of urine samples. Int J Legal Med. 1992;105(1):59–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Botezatu I, Og Serdyuk, Potapova G, Shelepov V, Alechina R, Molyaka Y, et al. Genetic analysis of DNA excreted in urine: a new approach for detecting specific genomic DNA sequences from cells dying in an organism. Clin Chem. 2000;46(8):1078–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reckamp KL, Melnikova VO, Karlovich C, Sequist LV, Camidge DR, Wakelee H, et al. A highly sensitive and quantitative test platform for detection of NSCLC EGFR mutations in urine and plasma. J Thoracic Oncol. 2016;11(10):1690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garcia-Murillas I, Schiavon G, Weigelt B, Ng C, Hrebien S, Cutts RJ, et al. Mutation tracking in circulating tumor DNA predicts relapse in early breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(302):302ra133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tachtsidis A, McInnes LM, Jacobsen N, Thompson EW, Saunders CM. Minimal residual disease in breast cancer: an overview of circulating and disseminated tumour cells. Clin Exp Metas. 2016;33(6):521–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guttery DS, Blighe K, Page K, Marchese SD, Hills A, Coombes RC, et al. Hide and seek: tell-tale signs of breast cancer lurking in the blood. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32(1–2):289–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008;14(9):985–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gedvilaitė V, Schveigert D, Cicėnas S. Cell-free DNA in non-small cell lung cancer. Acta medica Lituanica. 2017;24(2):138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants provided by Jingzhou First People’s Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Liu, W. Association of urinary and plasma DNA in early breast cancer patients and its links to disease relapse. Clin Transl Oncol 20, 1053–1060 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1825-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1825-9

Keywords

Navigation