Skip to main content
Log in

Failure modes and effects analysis of total skin electron irradiation technique

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Total skin electron irradiation (TSEI) is a radiotherapy technique which consists of an homogeneous body surface irradiation by electrons. This treatment requires very strict technical and dosimetric conditions, requiring the implementation of multiple controls. Recently, the Task Group 100 report of the AAPM has recommended adapting the quality assurance program of the facility to the risks of their processes.

Materials and methods

A multidisciplinary team evaluated the potential failure modes (FMs) of every process step, regardless of the management tools applied in the installation. For every FM, occurrence (O), severity (S) and detectability (D) by consensus was evaluated, which resulted in the risk priority number (RPN), which permitted the ranking of the FMs. Subsequently, all the management tools used, related to the TSEI process, were examined and the FMs were reevaluated, to analyze the effectiveness of these tools and to propose new management tools to cover the greater risk FMs.

Results

361 FMs were identified, 103 of which had RPN ≥80, initially, and 41 had S ≥ 8. Taking this into account the quality management tools FMs were reevaluated and only 30 FMs had RPN ≥80. The study of these 30 FMs emphasized that the FMs that involved greater risk were related to the diffuser screen placement and the patient’s position during treatment.

Conclusions

The quality assurance program of the facility has been adapted to the risk of this treatment process, following the guidelines proposed by the TG-100. However, clinical experience continually reveals new FMs, so the need for periodic risk analysis is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karzmack C, Anderson J, Buffa A, Fessenden P, Khan F, Svensson G, et al. The report of Task Group No. 23 of the AAPM: Total Skin Electron Therapy: Technique and dosimetry. AAPM; 1988.

  2. Mazzeo E, Rubino L, Buglione M, Antognoni P, Magrini SM, Bertoni F, et al. The current management of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome and the role of radiotherapy: principles and indications. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013;19:77–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Diamantopoulos S, Platoni K, Dilvoi M, Nazos I, Geropantas K, Maravelis G, et al. Clinical implementation of total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy: a review of the relevant literatura. Phys Med. 2011;27:62–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Podgorsak EB. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Viennas: IAEA; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bao Q, Hrycushko BA, Dugas JP, Hager FH, Solberg TD. A technique for pediatric total skin electron irradiation. Radiat Oncol. 2012;20:40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans MD, Hudon C, Podgorsak EB, Freeman CR. Institutional experience with a rotational total skin electron irradiation (RTSEI) technique-A three decade review (1981-2012). Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013;19:120–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim TH, Pla C, Pla M, Podgorsak EB. Clinical aspects of a rotational total skin electron irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1984;57:501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karzmark CJ, Loevinger R, Steele RE, Weissbluth M. A technique for large-field, superficial electron therapy. Radiology. 1960;74:633–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrasco E. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, 2007.

  10. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, et al. Comprehensive QA for Radiation Oncology: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No.40. Med Phys. 1994;21:581–618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group No. 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ortiz Lopez P, Cosset JM, Dunscombe P, Holmberg O, Rosenwald JC, Pinillos Ashton L, et al. ICRP publication 112. A report of preventing accidental exposures from new external beam radiation therapy technologies. Ann. ICRP. 2009;39:1–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huq MS, Fraass BA, Dunscombe PB, Gibbons JP, Ibbott GS, Mundt AJ, et al. The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. Med Phys. 2016;43:4209–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Malicki J, Przybylska K, Jahnen A, Godet JL, Valero M, Bulot M, et al. Radiation Protection nº181: General guidelines on risk management in external beam radiotherapy. European Commission 181; 2015.

  15. Ford EC, Gaudette R, Myers L, Vanderver B, Engineer L, Zellars R, et al. Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis. J. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:852–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teixeira FC, de Almeida CE, Huq MS. Failure mode and effects analysis based risk profile assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery programs at three cancer centers in Brazil. Med Phys. 2016;43:171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibanez-Rosello B, Bautista-Ballesteros JA, Bonaque J, Celada F, Lliso F, Carmona V, et al. Failure mode and effects analysis of skin electronic brachytherapy using Esteya® unit. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016;8:518–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang F, Cao N, Young L, Howard J, Logan W, Arbuckle T, et al. Validating FMEA output against incident learning data: a study in stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2015;42:2777–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayadev J, Dieterich S, Harse R, Lentz S, Mathai M, Boddu S, et al. A failure modes and effects analysis study for gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2015;14:866–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayler E, Eldredge-Hindy H, Dinome J, Lockamy V, Harrison AS. Clinical implementation and failure mode and effects analysis of HDR skin brachytherapy using Valencia and Leipzig surface applicators. Brachytherapy. 2014;14:293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manger RP, Paxton AB, Pawlicki T, Kim GY. Failure mode and effects analysis and fault tree analysis of surface image guided cranial radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2015;42:2449–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Younge KC, Wang Y, Thompson J, Giovinazzo J, Finlay M, Sankreacha R. Practical implementation of failure mode and effects analysis for safety and efficiency in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:1003–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. López-Tarjuelo J, Bouché-Babiloni A, Santos-Serra A, Morillo-Macías V, Calvo FA, Kubyshin Y, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis oriented to risk-reduction interventions in intraoperative electron radiation therapy: the specific impact of patient transportation, automation, and treatment planning availability. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Masini L, Donis L, Loi G, Mones E, Molina E, Bolchini C, et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to intracranial stereotactic radiation surgery by linear accelerator. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4:392–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Broggi S, Cantone MC, Chiara A, Di Muzio N, Longobardi B, Mangili P, et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to pretreatment phases in tomotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14:265–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cantone MC, Ciocca M, Dionisi F, Fossati P, Lorentini S, Krengli M, et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Perks JR, Stanic S, Stern RL, Henk B, Nelson MS, Harse RD, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis for delivery of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1324–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Government under grant FIS2013-42156.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Ibanez-Rosello.

Ethics declarations

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibanez-Rosello, B., Bautista, J.A., Bonaque, J. et al. Failure modes and effects analysis of total skin electron irradiation technique. Clin Transl Oncol 20, 330–365 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1721-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1721-3

Keywords

Navigation