Activity of weekly paclitaxel−cetuximab chemotherapy in unselected patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic factors
- 372 Downloads
Standard treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-SCCHN) is based in on platinum and cetuximab combination therapy. Unfortunately, not all patients are candidates to receive platinum-based treatment, because of different conditions as comorbidity and poor performance status. Weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab (WPC) is an active therapeutic alternative, based on a phase II study, with less toxicity. Our main objective is to confirm its activity in unselected patients, mostly unfit for aggressive therapies, analysing also some clinically relevant prognostic factors (PFs).
Retrospective data was collected for RM-SCCHN patients, treated at our institution between January 2008 and July 2014 with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m2).
148 patients were treated. The objective response rate (OR) was as follows: 13 patients (8.78%) complete response (CR); 57 patients (38.51%) partial response (PR) and 30 patients (20.3%) stable disease (SD). Median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (95% CI 8.31–11.69) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.88–8.12). Response to treatment showed independent prognosis relevance as PF in multivariate analysis for PFS and OS. Furthermore, decline in serum magnesium during the treatment was also an independent PF for OS.
WPC activity was confirmed as a useful therapy on real-life unselected RM-SCCHN patients, with similar benefit to that obtained in the phase II study, and comparable to platinum and cetuximab based treatment, confirming its value in unfit patients. In addition to treatment response, a change in serum magnesium values during treatment was proved as independent PF on OS.
KeywordsWeekly paclitaxel cetuximab Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Recurrent metastatic Prognostic factors Serum magnesium
- 3.Brockstein B, Haraf DJ, Rademaker AW, Kies MS, Stenson KM, Rosen F, et al. Patterns of failure, prognostic factors and survival in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy: a 9-year, 337-patient, multi institutional experience. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(8):1179–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hitt R, Irigoyen A, Cortes-Funes H, Grau JJ, García-Sáenz JA, Cruz Hernandez JJ, Spanish Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group (TTCC). Phase II study of the combination of cetuximab and weekly paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):1016–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Corrêa GT, Bandeira GA, Cavalcanti BG, Santos FB, Rodrigues Neto JF, Guimarães AL, et al. Analysis of ECOG performance status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: association with sociodemographical and clinical factors, and overall survival. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(11):2679–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Guigay J, Fayette J, Dillies AF, Sire C, Kerger JN, Tennevet I, et al. Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, phase II GORTEC study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(9):1941–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W, Mattar B, Forastiere AA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J ClinOncol. 2005; 23(34): 8646-54. Erratum in: J ClinOncol. 2006 Feb 1; 24(4): 724.Google Scholar
- 25.Baselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, Tortochaux J, Cortés-Funes H, Hitt R, et al. Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5568–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, Koralewski P, Diaz-Rubio E, Rolland F, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent inpatients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2171–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Vickers MM, Karapetis CS, Tu D, O’Callaghan CJ, Price TJ, Tebbutt NC, et al. Association of hypomagnesemia with inferior survival in a phase III, randomized study of cetuximab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone: NCIC CTG/AGITG CO. 17. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(4):953–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Bar-Ad V, Zhang QE, Harari PM, Axelrod R, Rosenthal DI, Trotti A, et al. Correlation between the severity of cetuximab-induced skin rash and clinical outcome for head and neck cancer patients: the RTOG experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(5):1346–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.011. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar