Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indirect comparisons in cost-effectiveness analysis: are we being naïve?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009;338:b1147.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C. Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11054.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D’Amico R, et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1–134 (iii–iv).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Villa G, Hernandez-Pastor LJ, Guix M, Lavernia J, Cuesta M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pazopanib in second-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma in Spain. Clinical and translational oncology: official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2014.

Download references

Conflict of interest

J. Martin-Broto has participated, in the past, in advisorie board of GSK, AMGEN, NOVARTIS AND PHARMAMAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Martin-Broto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin-Broto, J. Indirect comparisons in cost-effectiveness analysis: are we being naïve?. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 85–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1256-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1256-9

Keywords

Navigation