Abstract
Purpose
To report the outcomes of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) at a single institution and to determine the factors affecting response to chemotherapy and survival.
Methods/Patients
From 1979–2010, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 221 patients treated at our center. GTN Patients were assigned to low-risk (score ≤6) or high-risk (score ≥7) based on the WHO risk factor scoring system. Overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Logistic regression was applied to study the impact of different factors on the response to initial therapy.
Results
Patients’ OS rate was 97 %. Median age at diagnosis was 37 year. 131 (59 %) patients had low-risk and 88 (40 %) cases had high-risk GTN. Complete remission rates to initial chemotherapy in low-risk group were 53 % and 87 % for single-agent methotrexate or dactinomycin, respectively. In high-risk group, 94 % achieved complete remission to initial chemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA-CO). Etoposide, cisplatin, and dactinomycin as primary therapy in high-risk patients was successful in 70 %, while bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was successful in 53 % of cases. Salvage chemotherapy, surgical intervention or radiation therapy resulted in overall complete remission of 90 % in low-risk and 73 % in high-risk groups. Factors associated with resistance to initial chemotherapy were advanced-stage III/IV (p = 0.005), metastatic site other than lung or vagina (p = 0.005) and high-risk prognostic score (p = 0.05). OS was significantly influenced by the type of antecedent pregnancy (molar 98 % vs. others 93 %; p = 0.04), FIGO stage (I, II 100 % vs. III, IV 94 %; p = 0.02), score (low-risk 100 % vs. high-risk 92 %; p = 0.01), and site of metastasis (lung/vagina 98 % vs. others 85 %; p = 0.002).
Conclusions
GTNs have excellent prognosis if properly treated at experienced centers. Single-agent dactinomycin seems more effective for low-risk GTN. EMA-CO remains the preferred primary treatment regimen for high-risk group. The excellent outcome reflects the success of salvage therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Berkowitz RS. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):717–29.
Soper JT. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:176–87.
Lurain JR, Casanova LA, Miller DS, Rademaker AW. Prognostic factors in gestational trophoblastic tumors: A proposed new scoring system based on multivariate analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:611–6.
Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, Jones H, Montruccoli GC, Pecorelli S. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(Suppl 1):175–7.
Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Ten years’ experience with methotrexate and folinic acid as primary therapy for gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1986;23:111–8.
Ngan S, Seckl MJ. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia management: An update. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:486–91.
Chakrabarti BK, Mondal NR, Chatterjee T. Gestational trophoblastic tumor at a tertiary level cancer center: A retrospective study. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:875–8.
Lok CA, Ansink AC, Grootfaam D, van der Velden J, Verheijen RH, ten Kate-Booij MJ. Treatment and prognosis of post term choriocarcinoma in The Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:698–702.
El-Lamie IK, El Sayed HM, Badawie AG, Bayomi WA, El-Ghazaly HA, Khalaf-Allah AE, et al. Evolution of treatment of high-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors: Ain Shams University experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:866–74.
Osborne RJ, Filiaci V, Schink JC, Mannel RS, Alvarez Secord A, Kelley JL, et al. Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:825-31.
Matsui H, Iitsuka Y, Seki K, Sekiya S. Comparison of chemotherapies with methotrexate, VP-16 and actinomycin-D in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease: Remission rates and drug toxicities. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;46:5–8.
Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD, Begent RH, Rustin GJ, Holden L. Results with the EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimen in high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumours, 1979 to 1989. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:550–7.
Lurain JR, Singh DK, Schink JC. Primary treatment of metastatic high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with EMA-CO chemotherapy. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:767–72.
Escobar PF, Lurain JR, Singh DK, Bozorgi K, Fishman DA. Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:552–7.
Sita-Lumsden A, Short D, Lindsay I, Sebire NJ, Adjogatse D, Seckl MJ, et al. Treatment outcomes for 618 women with gestational trophoblastic tumours following a molar pregnancy at the Charing Cross Hospital, 2000-2009. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1810–4.
Matsui H, Iitsuka Y, Suzuka K, Yamazawa K, Mitsuhashi A, Sekiya S. Salvage chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor. J Reprod Med. 2004;49:438–42.
Loret de Mola JR. Goldfarb JM. Reproductive performance of patients after gestational trophoblastic disease. Semin Oncol. 1995;22:193–7.
Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Reproductive experience after complete and partial molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic tumors. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:3–8.
Roberts JP, Lurain JR. Treatment of low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors with single-agent chemotherapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1917–23; Discussion 1923–4.
Hoekstra AV, Lurain JR, Rademaker AW, Schink JC. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Treatment outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:251–8.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Husaini, H., Soudy, H., Darwish, A. et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 409–415 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1251-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1251-1