Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report the outcomes of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) at a single institution and to determine the factors affecting response to chemotherapy and survival.

Methods/Patients

From 1979–2010, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 221 patients treated at our center. GTN Patients were assigned to low-risk (score ≤6) or high-risk (score ≥7) based on the WHO risk factor scoring system. Overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Logistic regression was applied to study the impact of different factors on the response to initial therapy.

Results

Patients’ OS rate was 97 %. Median age at diagnosis was 37 year. 131 (59 %) patients had low-risk and 88 (40 %) cases had high-risk GTN. Complete remission rates to initial chemotherapy in low-risk group were 53 % and 87 % for single-agent methotrexate or dactinomycin, respectively. In high-risk group, 94 % achieved complete remission to initial chemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA-CO). Etoposide, cisplatin, and dactinomycin as primary therapy in high-risk patients was successful in 70 %, while bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was successful in 53 % of cases. Salvage chemotherapy, surgical intervention or radiation therapy resulted in overall complete remission of 90 % in low-risk and 73 % in high-risk groups. Factors associated with resistance to initial chemotherapy were advanced-stage III/IV (p = 0.005), metastatic site other than lung or vagina (p = 0.005) and high-risk prognostic score (p = 0.05). OS was significantly influenced by the type of antecedent pregnancy (molar 98 % vs. others 93 %; p = 0.04), FIGO stage (I, II 100 % vs. III, IV 94 %; p = 0.02), score (low-risk 100 % vs. high-risk 92 %; p = 0.01), and site of metastasis (lung/vagina 98 % vs. others 85 %; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

GTNs have excellent prognosis if properly treated at experienced centers. Single-agent dactinomycin seems more effective for low-risk GTN. EMA-CO remains the preferred primary treatment regimen for high-risk group. The excellent outcome reflects the success of salvage therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Berkowitz RS. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):717–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soper JT. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:176–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lurain JR, Casanova LA, Miller DS, Rademaker AW. Prognostic factors in gestational trophoblastic tumors: A proposed new scoring system based on multivariate analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:611–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, Jones H, Montruccoli GC, Pecorelli S. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(Suppl 1):175–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Ten years’ experience with methotrexate and folinic acid as primary therapy for gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1986;23:111–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ngan S, Seckl MJ. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia management: An update. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakrabarti BK, Mondal NR, Chatterjee T. Gestational trophoblastic tumor at a tertiary level cancer center: A retrospective study. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:875–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lok CA, Ansink AC, Grootfaam D, van der Velden J, Verheijen RH, ten Kate-Booij MJ. Treatment and prognosis of post term choriocarcinoma in The Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:698–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Lamie IK, El Sayed HM, Badawie AG, Bayomi WA, El-Ghazaly HA, Khalaf-Allah AE, et al. Evolution of treatment of high-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors: Ain Shams University experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:866–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne RJ, Filiaci V, Schink JC, Mannel RS, Alvarez Secord A, Kelley JL, et al. Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:825-31.

  11. Matsui H, Iitsuka Y, Seki K, Sekiya S. Comparison of chemotherapies with methotrexate, VP-16 and actinomycin-D in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease: Remission rates and drug toxicities. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;46:5–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD, Begent RH, Rustin GJ, Holden L. Results with the EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimen in high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumours, 1979 to 1989. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:550–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lurain JR, Singh DK, Schink JC. Primary treatment of metastatic high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with EMA-CO chemotherapy. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:767–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escobar PF, Lurain JR, Singh DK, Bozorgi K, Fishman DA. Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:552–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sita-Lumsden A, Short D, Lindsay I, Sebire NJ, Adjogatse D, Seckl MJ, et al. Treatment outcomes for 618 women with gestational trophoblastic tumours following a molar pregnancy at the Charing Cross Hospital, 2000-2009. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1810–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui H, Iitsuka Y, Suzuka K, Yamazawa K, Mitsuhashi A, Sekiya S. Salvage chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor. J Reprod Med. 2004;49:438–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loret de Mola JR. Goldfarb JM. Reproductive performance of patients after gestational trophoblastic disease. Semin Oncol. 1995;22:193–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Reproductive experience after complete and partial molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic tumors. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:3–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts JP, Lurain JR. Treatment of low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors with single-agent chemotherapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1917–23; Discussion 1923–4.

  20. Hoekstra AV, Lurain JR, Rademaker AW, Schink JC. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Treatment outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Husaini, H., Soudy, H., Darwish, A. et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 409–415 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1251-1

Keywords

Navigation