Skip to main content
Log in

Should we continue temozolomide beyond six cycles in the adjuvant treatment of glioblastoma without an evidence of clinical benefit? A cost analysis based on prescribing patterns in Spain

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The standard adjuvant treatment for glioblastoma is temozolomide concomitant with radiotherapy, followed by a further six cycles of temozolomide. However, due to the lack of empirical evidence and international consensus regarding the optimal duration of temozolomide treatment, it is often extended to 12 or more cycles, even in the absence of residual disease. No clinical trial has shown clear evidence of clinical benefit of this extended treatment. We have explored the economic impact of this practice in Spain.

Materials and methods

Spanish neuro-oncologists completed a questionnaire on the clinical management of glioblastomas in their centers. Based on their responses and on available clinical and demographic data, we estimated the number of patients who receive more than six cycles of temozolomide and calculated the cost of this extended treatment.

Results

Temozolomide treatment is continued for more than six cycles by 80.5 % of neuro-oncologists: 44.4 % only if there is residual disease; 27.8 % for 12 cycles even in the absence of residual disease; and 8.3 % until progression. Thus, 292 patients annually will continue treatment beyond six cycles in spite of a lack of clear evidence of clinical benefit. Temozolomide is covered by the National Health Insurance System, and the additional economic burden to society of this extended treatment is nearly 1.5 million euros a year.

Conclusions

The optimal duration of adjuvant temozolomide treatment merits investigation in a clinical trial due to the economic consequences of prolonged treatment without evidence of greater patient benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crocetti E, Trama A, Stiller C, Caldarella A, Soffietti R, Jaal J, et al. Epidemiology of glial and non-glial brain tumours in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1532–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(Suppl 5):v1–49.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuentes-Raspall R, Vilardell L, Perez-Bueno F, Joly C, Garcia-Gil M, Garcia-Velasco A, et al. Population-based incidence and survival of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in Girona (Spain) 1994–2005. J Neurooncol. 2011;101:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC–NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malkoun N, Chargari C, Forest F, Fotso MJ, Cartier L, Auberdiac P, et al. Prolonged temozolomide for treatment of glioblastoma: preliminary clinical results and prognostic value of p53 overexpression. J Neurooncol. 2012;106:127–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roldan Urgoiti GB, Singh AD, Easaw JC. Extended adjuvant temozolomide for treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol. 2012;108:173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Groves MD Jr, Plummer AB. Helping patients make the best decision regarding duration of temozolomide chemotherapy treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012;18:421–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:453–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Pession A, Tallini G, et al. MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Calbucci F, et al. Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10:361–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graus F, Bruna J, Pardo J, Escudero D, Vilas D, Barcelo I et al. Patterns of care and outcome for patients with glioblastoma diagnosed during 2008–2010 in Spain. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(6):797–805.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bauchet L, Mathieu-Daude H, Fabbro-Peray P, Rigau V, Fabbro M, Chinot O, et al. Oncological patterns of care and outcome for 952 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in 2004. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:725–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brada M, Hoang-Xuan K, Rampling R, Dietrich PY, Dirix LY, Macdonald D, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados MD, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stupp R, Tonn JC, Brada M, Pentheroudakis G. High-grade malignant glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v190–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mason WP, Maestro RD, Eisenstat D, Forsyth P, Fulton D, Laperriere N, et al. Canadian recommendations for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Curr Oncol. 2007;14:110–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malkoun N, Fotso MJ, Cartier L, Forest F, Auberdiac P, Chargari C, et al. Benefit of a prolonged adjuvant treatment with temozolomide for the management of patients with glioblastoma. Cancer Radiother. 2011;15:202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grossman SA, Ye X, Piantadosi S, Desideri S, Nabors LB, Rosenfeld M, et al. Survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide in research studies in the United States. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2443–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American Society of Clinical Oncology. RTOG 0525: A randomized phase III trial comparing standard adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with a dose-dense (dd) schedule in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). In: Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, Stupp R, Hegi M, Jaeckle KA et al, editors. Proceedings of the 2011 ASCO Meeting. June 3–7. Chicago, USA.

  21. Weller M, Stupp R, Reifenberger G, Brandes AA, van den Bent MJ, Wick W, et al. MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine? Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holdhoff M, Grossman SA. Controversies in the adjuvant therapy of high-grade gliomas. Oncologist. 2011;16:351–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Brandes AA. Adjuvant temozolomide: how long and how much? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008;8:663–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following neuro-oncologists who participated in the survey: V. Moreno (Hospital La Paz, Madrid), O. Gallego (Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona), C. Sanchez (Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada), I. Marquez (Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid), I. Fernandez (Hospital Universitario, Vigo), P. Fuster (Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca), E. Pujol (Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza), M. Navarro (Hospital Universitario, Salamanca), C. Mesía (Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona), T. Quejereta (Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz), S. Del Barco (Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Trueta, Girona), C. Olier (Hospital de Alcorcón, Madrid), P. Ramirez (Hospital Puerta de Cádiz, Cádiz), E. Vicente (Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas), R. Marsé (Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca), S. Peralta (Hospital Sant Joan, Reus), M. Santiesteban (Clinica de Navarra, Navarra), T. Quintanar (Hospital Universitario de Elche, Elche), A. Herrero (Hospital Miquel Servet, Zaragoza), M. Quindos (Hospital Teresa Herrera, Complejo Hospitalario La Coruña, La Coruña), B. Perez-Valderrama (Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla), R. Romero (Hospital Lucus Agusti, Lugo). The authors also thank Mercè Francisco and Anna del Prado from Marketing Farmacéutico & Investigación Clínica, S.L. (MFAR) for their expert technical assistance in conducting the survey and Renée O’Brate for her assistance in drafting the manuscript. This work has received no financial support.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Balañá.

Additional information

On behalf of the Spanish Neuro-Oncology Research Group (GEINO).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balañá, C., Vaz, M.A., Lopez, D. et al. Should we continue temozolomide beyond six cycles in the adjuvant treatment of glioblastoma without an evidence of clinical benefit? A cost analysis based on prescribing patterns in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 16, 273–279 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-013-1068-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-013-1068-3

Keywords

Navigation