Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence-based estimation and radiotherapy utilisation rate in Andalusia

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to estimate the theoretical needs-based on evidence-of radiotherapy treatments (RDT) in Andalusia, compare these needs with actual use of RDT in 2006 and analyse their evolution from 2003.

Materials and methods

Correlation between quantitative variables was analysed with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. This dealt with differences between administered/estimated treatments and treatments carried out in years with the Student’s tdistribution, and the χ2 test among qualitative variables.

Results

In Andalusia, the evidence-based rate of cancer irradiation is 55%. Eighty-five percent of theoretical treatments were administered in 2006. From this group, 107% were in gynaecological tumours, 100% in breast cancer cases, 71% in head and neck cancer and 48% in lung cancers; differences in the last two conditions were significant (p<0.01). As for regional distribution, differences were reported with reference to irradiation rates (p<0.0002) and resource distribution. In the last three years, an increment of 17% was observed in treatments conducted in public hospitals. The rate increased from 61% (with regard to optimal values) to 85% in 2006; in a parallel way, an increment was seen in therapy units (from 22 to 26) and radiation oncologists (from 57 to 69).

Conclusions

Despite the increment of irradiation rates seen in the last years, there is still a serious underutilisation of RDT for some cancer types (lung, head and neck cancer), as well as a great variability in the use of RDT between hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. López-Abente G, Pollán M, Aragonés N et al (2004) Plan integral del cáncer. Situación del cáncer en España. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Centro de Publicaciones, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  2. SBU (1996) The Swedish council on technology assessment in health care: radiotherapy for cancer, Vol. 1. Acta Oncol 35

  3. SBU (1996) The Swedish council on technology assessment in health care: radiotherapy for cancer, Vol. 2: a critical review of the literature. Acta Oncol 35

  4. Palacios A, Escó R, López C, Petschen I (2002) Situación de la asistencia oncológica. In: Muñoz A (ed.) Oncología Radioterápica. Tercer Libro Blanco de la Oncología en España. Ergón Creación, S.A., Majadahonda

    Google Scholar 

  5. Board of the Faculty of Clinical Oncology (2003) Equipment, workload and staffing for radiotherapy in the UK 1997–2002. The Royal College of Radiologists, London

  6. Ballas LK, Elkin EB, Schrag D et al (2006) Radiation therapy facilities in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66: 1204–1211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Payne S, Jarrett N, Jeffs D (2000) The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experiences of treatment: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 9:197–203. Review

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pagano E, Di Cuonzo D, Bona C et al (2007) Accessibility as a major determinant of radiotherapy underutilization: a population based study. Health Policy 80:483–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Voti L, Richardson LC, Reis IM et al (2006) Treatment of local breast carcinoma in Florida: the role of the distance to radiation therapy facilities. Cancer 106:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Escó R, Palacios A, Pardo J et al (2003) Infrastructure of radiotherapy in Spain: a minimal standard of radiotherapy resources. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:319–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayo E, Márquez M (2006) Situación de la asistencia oncológica. In: Oncología Radioterápica. Libro Blanco de la Oncología en Andalucía. Informe para la Planificación d la Oncología. Sociedad Andaluza de Cancerología, Content’ed ned communications, S.L. e Impresión Amoretti, S.L., Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bentzen SM, Heeren G, Cottier B et al (2005) Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. Radiother Oncol 75:355–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Expósito J, Cabrera P, Prieto D et al. Study on variability in the use and accessibility of radiotherapy in public hospitals in Andalusia. VARA Proyect Report. Supported by the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía

  14. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M (2005) The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer 104:1129–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moller TR, Brorsson B, Ceberg J et al (2003) A prospective survey of radiotherapy practice 2001 in Sweden. Acta Oncol 42:387–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyldesley S, Boyd C, Schulze K et al (2001) Estimating the need for radiotherapy for lung cancer: an evidence-based, epidemiologic approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:973–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gálvez P, Aranda E, Escalera C et al (2002) Plan Integral de Oncología de Andalucía (2002–2006). Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jaén Olasolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaén Olasolo, J., Alonso Redondo, E., Expósito Hernández, J. et al. Evidence-based estimation and radiotherapy utilisation rate in Andalusia. Clin Transl Oncol 9, 789–796 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-007-0141-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-007-0141-1

Key words

Navigation