Advertisement

Indian Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 165–173 | Cite as

Adaptive Strategies of Bacillus thuringiensis Isolated from Acid Mine Drainage Site in Sabah, Malaysia

  • Low Yi Yik
  • Grace Joy Wei Lie Chin
  • Cahyo Budiman
  • Collin Glenn Joseph
  • Baba Musta
  • Kenneth Francis Rodrigues
Original Research Article

Abstract

The adaptive process in bacteria is driven by specific genetic elements which regulate phenotypic characteristics such as tolerance to high metal ion concentrations and the secretion of protective biofilms. Extreme environments such as those associated with heavy metal pollution and extremes of acidity offer opportunities to study the adaptive mechanisms of microorganisms. This study focused on the genome analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt MCMY1), a gram positive rod shaped bacterium isolated from an acid mine drainage site in Sabah, Malaysia by using a combination of Single Molecule Real Time DNA Sequencing, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The genome size of Bt MCMY1 was determined to be 5,458,152 bases which was encoded on a single chromosome. Analysis of the genome revealed genes associated with resistance to Copper, Mercury, Arsenic, Cobalt, Zinc, Cadmium and Aluminum. Evidence from SEM and FTIR indicated that the bacterial colonies form distinct films which bear the signature of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and this finding was supported by the genome data indicating the presence of a genetic pathway associated with the biosynthesis of PHAs. This is the first report of a Bacillus sp. isolated from an acid mine drainage site in Sabah, Malaysia and the genome sequence will provide insights into the manner in which B. thuringiensis adapts to acid mine drainage.

Keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis Acid mine drainage Polyhydroxyalkanoates Metal tolerance Single molecule real time (SMRT) sequencing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Government of Malaysia, Ministry of Higher Education, Fundamental Research Grant Scheme. Project title: Molecular Characterization of the Bacterial and Archaeal Diversity of Mamut Copper Mine (FRG0455-TWN-1/2016). The authors wish to acknowledge the collaboration provided by the Department of Mineralogy, State Government of Sabah, Malaysia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaenicke R (1991) Protein stability and molecular adaptation to extreme conditions. Eur J Biochem 202:715–728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77200-9_22 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babu P, Chandel AK, Singh OV (2015) Extremophiles and their applications in medical processes. Extrem Bact.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12808-5_4 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson DB, Schippers A (2017) Editorial: recent advances in acidophile microbiology: fundamentals and applications. Front Microbiol 8:428.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00428 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van de Vossenberg JLCM, Driessen AJM, Zillig W, Konings WN (1998) Bioenergetics and cytoplasmic membrane stability of the extremely acidophilic, thermophilic archeon Picrophilus oshimae. Extremophiles 2:67–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s007920050044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawashima T, Amano N, Koike H, Makino S, Higuchi S, Kawashima-Ohya Y, Watanabe K, Yamazaki M, Kanehori K, Kawamoto T, Nunoshiba T, Yamamoto Y, Aramaki H, Makino K, Suzuki M (2000) Archaeal adaptation to higher temperatures revealed by genomic sequence of Thermoplasma volcanium. PNAS 97:14257–14262.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14257 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawarabayasi Y, Hino Y, Horikawa H, Jin-no K, Takahashi M, Sekine M, Baba S, Ankai A, Kosugi H, Hosoyama A, Fukui S, Nagai Y, Nishijima K, Otsuka R, Nakazawa H, Takamiya M, Kato Y, Yoshizawa T, Tanaka T, Kudoh Y, Yamazaki J, Kushida N, Oguchi A, Aoki K, Masuda S, Yanagii M, Nishimura M, Yamagishii A, Oshima T, Kikuchi H (2001) Complete genome sequence of an Aerobic Thermoacidophilic Crenarchaeon, Sulfolobus tokodaii strain7. DNA Res 8:123–140.  https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/8.4.123 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang X, Liu X, Liang Y, Guo X, Xiao Y, Ma L, Miao B, Liu H, Peng D, Huang W, Zhang Y, Yin H (2017) Adaptive evolution of extreme acidophile Sulfobacillus thermosulfodooxidans potentially driven by horizontal gene transfer and gene loss. Appl Environ Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03098-16 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marandi R (2011) Bioextraction of Cu (II) ions from acid mine drainage by Bacillus thuringiensis. Int J of Biol Eng 1:11–17.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j/ijbe.20110101.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oves M, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2013) Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thuringiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil. Saudi J Biol Sci 20:121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofte H, Whiteley HR (1989) Insectidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242–255PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frankenhuyzen KV (2009) Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol 101:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang F, Peng D, Cheng C, Zhou W, Ju S, Wan D, Yu Z, Shi J, Deng Y, Wang F, Ye X, Hu Z, Lin J, Ruan L, Sun M (2016) Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein Cry6Aa triggers Caenorhabditis elegans necrosis pathway mediated by aspartic protease (ASP-1). Int J Mol Sci 17:1355.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005389 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raymond B, Federici BA (2017) Perspective in defence of Bacillus thuringiensis, the safest and most successful microbial insecticide available to humanity—a response to EFSA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix084 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papazisi L, Rasko DA, Ratnayake S, Bock G, Remortel BG, Appalla L, Liu J, Dracheva T, Braisted JC, Shallom S, Jarrahi B, Snesrud E, Ahn S, Sun Q, Rilstone J, Økstad OA, Kolstø A, Fleischmann RD, Peterson SN (2011) Investigating the genome diversity of B. cereus and evolutionary aspects of B. anthracis emergence. Genomics 98:26–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.03.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zwick ME, Joseph SJ, Didelot X, Chen PE, Bishop-Lilly KA, Stewart AC, Willner K, Nolan N, Lentz S, Thomason MK, Sozhamannan S, Mateczun AJ, Du L, Read TD (2012) Genomic characterization of the Bacillus cereus sensu lato species: backdrop to the evolution of Bacillus anthracis. Genome Res 22:1512–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.134437.111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christel S, Herold M, Bellenberg S, Hajjami ME, Buetti-Dinh A, Pivkin IV, Sand W, Wilmes P, Poetsch A, Dopson M (2017) Multi-omics reveal the lifestyle of the acidophilic, mineral-oxidizing model species Leptospirillum ferriphilum. Appl Environ Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02091-17 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azizli KM, Yau TC, Birrel J (1995) Technical note design of the Lohan Tailings Dam, Mamut Copper Mining Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia. Miner Eng 8:705–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(95)00031-k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ali MF, Heng LY, Ratnam W, Nais J, Ripin R (2004) Metal distribution and contamination of the Mamut River, Malaysia, caused by copper mine discharge. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73:535–542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-004-0462-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ali BNM, Lin CY, Cleophas F, Abdullah MH, Musta B (2015) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in Mamut River sediment using sediment quality guidelines and geochemical indices. Environ Monit Assess 185:4190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4190-y Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jopony M, Tongkul F (2009) Acid mine drainages at Mamut Copper Mine, Sabah, Malaysia. Borneo Sci 24:83–94Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    QIAGEN (2006) Protocol: pretreatment for gram-positive bacteria and purification of total DNA from animal tissues (spin-column protocol). DNeasy Blood Tissue Handb 30–48Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thermo Scientific (2014) Protocol A. Plasmid DNA purification using centrifuges. GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep KitGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang Y, Hahn S, Kim B, Chang H (1994) Optimization of microbial poly (3-hdroxybutyrate) recovery using dispersion of sodium hypochlorite solution and chloroform. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:256–261.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440215 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh P, Parmar N (2011) Isolation and characterization of two novel polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)-producing bacteria. Afr J Biotechnol 10:4907–4919.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1737 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Department of the Environment (1993) Code of practice for agriculture use of sewage sludgeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller KW, Risanico SS, Risatti JB (1992) Differential tolerance of Sulfolobus strains to transition-metals. FEMS Micriobiol Lett 93:69–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097992)90491-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walkin ELJ, Keeling SE, Perrot FA, Shier DW, Palmer ML, Watling HR (2008) Metals tolerance in moderately thermophilic isolates from a spent copper sulfide heap, closely related to Acidithiobacillus caldus, Acidimicrobium ferroxidans and Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:461–465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S10295-008-0508-5 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Q, Xu LZ, Ai P, Huang GH, Li P, Zheng AP (2015) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis strain HD521. Stand Genom Sci 10:62.  https://doi.org/10.1186/S40793-015-0058-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    He J, Wang J, Yin W, Shao X, Zheng H, Li M, ZhaoY Sun M, Wang S, Yu Z (2011) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. chinensis strain CT-43. J Bacteriol 193:3407–3408.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.05085-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murawska E, Fiedoruk K, Bideshi K, Swiecicka I (2013) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Thuringiensis Strain IS5056, an Isolate highly toxic to Trichoplusia ni. Genome Announc 1:e00108-13.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomea.00108-13 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sheppard AE, Poehlein A, Rosenstiel P, Leisegang H, Scholenburg H (2013) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 407 Cry. Genome Announc 1:e00158-12.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomea.00158-12 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu Y, Lai Q, Göker M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Wang M, Sun Y, Wang L, Shao Z (2015) Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci Rep 5:14082.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14082 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarrafzadeh MH, Bigey F, Capariccio B, Mehrnia M, Guiraud J, Navarro J (2007) Simple indicators of plasmid loss during fermentation of Bacillus thuringiensis. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1052–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oshima T, Arakawa H, Baba M (1977) Biochemical studies on an acidophilic, thermophilic bacterium Bacillus acidocaldarius: isolation of bacteria, intracellular pH and stabilities of biopolymers. J Biochem 81:1107–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131535 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Futterer O, Angelov A, Liesegang H, Gottschalk G, Schleper C, Dock C, Antranikian G, Liebl W (2004) Genome sequence of Picrophilus torridus and its implications for life around pH 0. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9091–9096.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401356101 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baker-Austin C, Dopson M (2007) Life in acid: pH homeostasis in acidophiles. Trends Microbiol 15:165–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007/02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bowra BJ, Dilworth MJ (1981) Motility and chemotaxis towards sugars in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 126:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-126-1-231 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lauffenburger D, Aris R, Keller K (1982) Effects of cell motility and chemotaxis on microbial population growth. Biophys J 40:209–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(82)84476-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fujinami S, Terahara N, Krulwich TA, Ito M (2009) Motility and chemotaxis in alkaliphilic Bacillus species. Future Microbiol 4:1137–1149.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.09.76 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Acuna J, Rojas J, Amaro AM, Toledo H, Jerez CA (1992) Chemotaxis of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and other acidophilic chemolothotrophs: comparison with the Escherichia coli chemosensory system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 96:37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(92)90453-u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moreno-Paz M, Gomez MJ, Arcas A, Parro V (2010) Environmental transcriptome analysis reveals physiological differences between biofilm and plantonic modes of life of the iron oxidizing bacteria Leptospirillum spp. In their natural microbial community. BMC Genom 11:404.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang X, Feng X, Tao J, Ma L, Xiao Y, Liang Y, Liu X, Yin H (2016) Comparative genomics of the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans reveals intraspecific divergence and niche adaptation. Int J Mol Sci 17:1355.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijm17081355 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jiao Y, Cody GD, Harding AK, Wilmes P, Schrenk M, Wheeler KE, Banfield JF, Thelen MP (2010) Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances from acidophilic microbial biofilm. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2916–2922.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02289-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Llamas I, Amjres H, Mata JA, Quesada E, Bejar V (2012) The potential biotechnological applications of the exopolysaccharide produced by the halophilic bacterium Halomonas almeriensis. Molecules 17:7103–7120.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nocelli N, Bogino PC, Banchio E, Giordano W (2016) Roles of extracellular polysaccharides and biofilm formation in heavy metal resistance of Rhizobia. Materials.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060418 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Keshavarz T, Roy I (2010) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: bioplastics with a green agenda. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.02.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Strong PJ, Laycock B, Mahamud SNS, Jensen PD, Lant PA, Tyson G, Prat S (2016) The opportunity for high-performance biomaterials from methane. Microorganisms.  https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms4010011 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh M, Kumar P, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2013) Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate co-polymer by Bacillus thuringiensis. Indian J Microbiol 53:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0294-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zubairi SI, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A, Aizad S (2015) Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) for tissue engineering applications: biotransformation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) to value-added polymers. Jurnal Teknologi Science Engineering 78:13–29.  https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4042 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gomaa EZ (2014) Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) by Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli grown on cane molasses fortified with ethanol. Braz Arch Biol Technol 57:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132014000100020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hong K, Sun S, Tian W, Chen GQ, Huang W (1999) A rapid method for detecting bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates in intact cells by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:523–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gupta S, Madan RN, Bansal MC (1987) Chemical composition of Pinus caribaea hemicellulose. Tappi J (USA) 70(8):113–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Microbiologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology Research InstituteUniversiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and Natural ResourcesUniversiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations