Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of Subclinical Mastitis and Prevalence of Major Mastitis Pathogens in Organized Farms and Unorganized Sectors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subclinical mastitis (SCM) represents a major proportion of the burden of mastitis. Determining somatic cell count (SCC) and electrical conductivity (EC) of milk are useful approaches to detect SCM. In order to correlate grades of SCM with the load of five major mastitis pathogens, 246 milk samples from a handful of organized and unorganized sectors were screened. SCC (>5 × 105/mL) and EC (>6.5 mS/cm) identified 110 (45 %) and 153 (62 %) samples, respectively, to be from SCM cases. Randomly selected SCM-negative samples as well as 186 samples positive by either SCC or EC were then evaluated for isolation of five major mastitis-associated bacteria. Of the 323 isolates obtained, 95 each were S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 48 were E. coli and 85 were streptococci. There was no association between the distribution of organisms and (a) the different groups of SCC, or (b) organised farms and unorganised sectors. By contrast, there was a significant difference in the distribution of CoNS, and not other species, between organized farms and unorganized sectors. In summary, bacteria were isolated irrespective of the density of somatic cells or the type of farm setting, and the frequency of isolation of CoNS was higher with organized farms. These results suggest the requirement for fine tuning SCC and EC limits and the higher probability for CoNS to be associated with SCM in organized diary sectors, and have implications for the identification, management and control of mastitis in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson DJ, Gonzales RN, Das HH (1997) Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. J Dairy Sci 80:2592–2598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver SP, Calvinho LF (1995) Influence of inflammation on mammary gland metabolism and milk composition. J Anim Sci 73:18–33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh PJ, Singh PB (1994) A study of economic losses due to mastitis in India. Ind J Dairy Sci 47:265–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bansal BK, Gupta DK (2009) Economic analysis of bovine mastitis in India and Punjab. Ind J Dairy Sci 62:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hayakawa Y, Akagi M, Hayashi M, Shimango T, Komae H, Funaki O, Kaidoh T, Takeuchi S (2000) Antibody response to toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy cows. Vet Microbiol 72:321–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pyorala S (2003) Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet Res 34:565–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwal MS (2011) Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 24:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitra M, Ghosh D, Ali K, Guha C, Pramanic AK (1995) Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in an organized buffalo farm at Haringhata. Ind Vet J 72:1310–1311

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mallikarjunaswamy MC, Krishnamurthy GV (1997) Antibiogram of bacterial pathogens isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis cases. Ind Vet J 74:885–886

    Google Scholar 

  10. Datta S, Rangnekar A (2001) Subclinical mastitis in a Jersey herd. Ind Vet J 78:161–162

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumari MP, Ramgupta JB (2002) Diagnosis and therapy of subclinical mastitis in post parturient cows. Ind Vet J 79:89

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rajeev NK, Isloor S, Rathnamma D, Shridhar NB (2009) Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli of bovine mastitis. Ind Vet J 86:883–885

    Google Scholar 

  13. Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B (2008) Tests for identification of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A (eds) Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anonymous (1971) A monograph on bovine mastitis. In: International Dairy Federation Bulletin, Brussels, Belgium

  15. Paape MJ, Contreras A (1997) Historical perspective on the evaluation of the milk somatic cell count. Flem Vet J Suppl 66:93–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sargeant JM, Leslie KE, Shirley JE, Pulkrabek JL, Liim GH (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California mastitis test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 84:2018–2024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansell PD, Seguya A (2003) The use of a hand-held conductivity meter for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows during late lactation. New Zealand Vet J 51:21–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamann J, Nipp B, Zecconi A (1998) Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator. In: International Dairy Federation Bulletin, Brussels, Belgium

  19. Jensen NE, Knudsen K (1991) Inter-quarter comparison of markers of subclinical mastitis: somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase and antitrypsin. J Dairy Res 58:389–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Botrel MA, Haenni M, Morignat E, Madec JY, Calavas D (2010) Distribution and antimicrobial resistance of clinical and subclinical mastitis pathogens in dairy cows in Rhône-Alpes, France. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7:479–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schukken YH, Grommers FJ, van de Geer D, Brand A, van degeer D (1989) Incidence of clinical mastitis on farms with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Vet Rec 125:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatt VD, Ahir VB, Koringa PG, Jakhesara SJ, Rank DN, Nauriyal DS, Kunjadi AP, Joshi CG (2012) Milk microbiome signatures of subclinical mastitis-affected cattle analysed by shotgun sequencing. J Appl Microbiol 112:639–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Odierno L, Calvinho L, Traverssa P, Lasagno M, Bogni C, Reinoso E (2006) Conventional identification of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 89:3886–3890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonano M, Winter P (2008) Phenotypic and molecular identification of Streptococcal species isolated from milk of intra mammary infected Dairy cows in Austria. In: Proceedings of international conference on Mastitis control: from science to practice, September 30th–2nd October 2008, The Hague, Netherlands

  25. Khan IU, Hassan AA, Abdulmawjood A, Lammler C, Wolter W, Zschock M (2003) Identification and epidemiological characterization of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine mastitis using conventional and molecular methods. J Vet Sci 4:213–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. King JS (1981) Streptococcus uberis: a review of its role as a causative organism of bovine mastitis. Br Vet J 137:160–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Calvinho LF, Vitulich CA, Zurbriggen MA, Canavesio VR, Tarabla HD (1991) Prevalencia de microorganismos patogenos de la ubre en rodeos de la cuenca lechera santafesina. [Prevalence of microorganisms as udder pathogens in the dairy herds of Santa Fe]. Therios 18:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thoerberg BM (2008) Coagulase negative staphylococci in bovine subclinical mastitis. Master’s Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  29. Euzeby JP (2008) List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/. Accessed 8 July 2012

  30. Lim GH, Leslie KE, Kelton DF, Duffield TF, Timms LL, Dingwell RT (2007) Adherence and efficacy of an external sealant to prevent new intramammary infections in the dry period. J Dairy Sci 90:1289–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Taponen S (2008) Bovine mastitis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland

  32. Tenhagen BA, Koster G, Wallman J, Henwieser W (2006) Pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. J Dairy Sci 89:2542–2551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pitkala A, Haveri M, Pyorala S, Myllys V, Buzalski HT (2004) Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001-prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. J Dairy Sci 87:2433–2441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Trinidad P, Nickerson SC, Adkinson RW (1990) Histopathology of Staphylococcal mastitis in inbred dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 73:639–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research under the National Agriculture Innovation Projects Scheme. We thank Avinash Bhat, Dept. of Pharmacology, Veterinary College, Bengaluru, for assistance with statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagendra R. Hegde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hegde, R., Isloor, S., Prabhu, K.N. et al. Incidence of Subclinical Mastitis and Prevalence of Major Mastitis Pathogens in Organized Farms and Unorganized Sectors. Indian J Microbiol 53, 315–320 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0336-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0336-1

Keywords

Navigation