Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative efficacy and pathogenicity of keratinophilic soil fungi against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Out of seven fungal species belonging to four genera isolated from pond and wallow soils using feathers of Pavo cristatus as bait, four species viz., Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium and Trichophyton ajelloi were most frequent. Chrysosporium and Trichophyton spp. were more pathogenic on Culex quinquefasciatus larvae than Aspergillus and Penicillium. The bioefficacy tests conducted as per the protocol of World Health Organization and the LC50 values calculated by the Probit analysis showed that 3rd-instar C. quinquefasciatus were more susceptible to the conidia of above fungi. Highest mortality was observed in the larvae of C. quinquefasciatus when exposed to T. ajelloi. The density of fungal conidia was greatest on the ventral brush, palmate hair and anal region of the mosquito larvae after exposing for 72 hours. The potentiality of these fungi for use in the control of C. quinquefasciatus is discussed which can be exploited as a suitable biocontrol agent in the tropics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das D, Kumar S, Dash AP and Babu BV (2005) Knowledge of lymphatic filariasis among the population of an endemic area in rural Madhya Pradesh, India. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 99: 101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Michael E, Bundy DAP and Grenfell BT (1996) Reassessing the global prevalence and distribution of lymphatic filariasis. Parasitology 112:409–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Das PK, Pani SP and Krishnamoorthy K (2002) Prospects of elimination of lymphatic filariasis in India. ICMR Bulletin 32:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shah PA and Pell JK (2003) Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61: 413–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sur B, Bihari V, Sharma A and Basu SK (1999) Survey of termite-inhabited soil and mosquito breeding sites in Lucknow, India for potential mycopathogens of Anopheles stephensi. Mycopathologia 144:77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soares GG, Riba G, Caudal A and Vincent JJ (1985) Comparative studies of eleven isolates of the fungal entomopathogen Tolypocladium cylindrosporum and two isolates of Tolypocladium extinguens. J Invertebr Pathol 46: 115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deshmukh SK and Verekar SA (2006) Keratinophilic fungi from the vicinity of meteorite crater soils of Lonar (India). Mycopathologia 162:303–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saxena P, Kumar A and Shrivastava JN (2004) Diversity of keratinophilic mycoflora in the soil of Agra (India). Folia Microbiol 49:430–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohanty SS and Prakash S (2000) Laboratory evaluation of Trichophyton ajelloi, a fungal pathogen of Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 16:254–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Oorschot CAN (1980) A revision of Chrysosporium and allied genera. Studies in mycology 20:1–85

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raper KB and Fennell DI (1965) The genus Aspergillus. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company 1–686

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frey D, Oldfield RJ and Bridger RC (1980) A colour atlas of pathogenic fungi. Wolfe Medical Publications Limited 1–51

  13. Domsch KH, Games W and Anderson TH (1980) Compendium of soil fungi. London: Academic Press 1–859

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner JM and Pillai JS (1986) Tolypocladium cylindrosporum (Deuteromycotina: Moniliales), a fungal pathogen of the mosquito Aedes australis. Mycopathologia 96:87–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohanty SS and Prakash S (2002) Efficacy of Chrysosporium lobatum against larvae of malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi in the laboratory. Current Science 83:1585–1588

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis. 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1–333

    Google Scholar 

  17. Serit MA and Yap HH (1984) Comparative bioassays of Tolypocladium cylindrosporum Gams (Californian strain) against four species of mosquitoes in Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 15:331–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alves SB, Alves LFA, Lopes RB, Pereira RM and Vieira SA (2002) Potential of some Metarhizium anisopliae isolates for control of Culex quinquefasciatus (Dipt: Culicidae). J Appl Entomol 126:504–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mvoutoulou N (1992) Larvicidal effects of Penicillium citrinum spores and extracts upon Aedes aegypti. J Invertebr Pathol 60:208–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiser J (1991) Biological control of vectors. England: John Wiley & Sons Limited 1–189

    Google Scholar 

  21. Balaraman K, Bheema Rao US and Rajagopalan PK (1979) Isolation of Metarrhizium anisopliae, Beauveria tenella and Fusarium oxysporum (Deuteromycetes) and their pathogenicity to Culex fatigans and Anopheles stephensi. Indian J Med Res 70:718–722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark TB, Kellen WR, Fukuda T and Lindegren JE (1968) Field and laboratory studies on the pathogenicity of the fungus Beauveria bassiana to three genera of mosquito. J Invertebr Pathol 11:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman Sundar Mohanty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohanty, S.S., Prakash, S. Comparative efficacy and pathogenicity of keratinophilic soil fungi against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. Indian J Microbiol 50, 299–302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-010-0051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-010-0051-8

Keywords

Navigation