Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of native Bacillus thuringiensis strains by PCR-RAPD based fingerprinting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seventy isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis were isolated from soil samples collected from cotton fields. These isolates were characterized by randomly amplified poylmorphic DNA (RAPD) markers to determine their genetic diversity pattern based on their source of origin. Different random decamer primers were used for RAPD amplification, which generated a total of 1935 fragments; of these 1865 were polymorphic and 68 monomorphic. The primers OPA03, OPA08, OPD14, OPD19, OPD20, OPE17 and OPD19 produced 100% polymorphic fragments, whereas primers OPC06, OPC20 and OPD17 produced 20, 31 and 17 monomorphic fragments, respectively. When the RAPD banding pattern data was subjected to dendrogram construction, the 70 isolates fell into two separate clusters, cluster I and cluster II, which includes 26 and 44 B. thuringiensis isolates, respectively. These two main clusters were further divided into four subclusters at Eucledian distance of 150 and 80% similarity index. All primers showed amplification and indicated the good diversity of B. thuringiensis isolates. The RAPD pattern showed 4–10 bands per isolate, with MWt in the range of 0.4–3.5 Kb and an average of 193.5 fragments were produced per primer. The primer OPE17 was found to be the most discriminatory as it produced 286 polymorphic bands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hofte H and Whiteley HR (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Micorbiol Rev 53:242–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Charles JF, Nielson-LeRoux C and Deecluse (1996) A Bacillus sphericus toxins: Molecular biology and mode of action. Annul Rev Entomol 41:389–410

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin P and Travers R (1989) Worldwide abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 2437–2442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iriarte J, Bel Y, Ferrandis MD, Andrew R, Murillo J, Ferre J and Caballero P(1998) Environmental distribution and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in Spain. Sys Appl Microbiol 21:97–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caetano-Anolles G, Bassam BJ and Gresshoff PM (1991) DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotige primers. Biotechnology 9:553–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Bruijn (1992) Use of repetitive (repetitive extragenic palandromic and enterobacterial repetitive intergeneric consensus) sequences and the polymerase chain reaction to fingerprint the genomes of Rhizobium meliloti isolates and other soil bacteria. Applied Env Microbiol 58: 2180–2187

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sikora S, Redzepovic S, Pejic, I and Kozumplik V (1997) Genetic diversity of Bradyrhizobium japonicum field population revealed by RAPD fingerprinting. J Applied Microbiol 82:527–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Welsh J and McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 7213–7218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams JGK, Kubelik A R, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by aribitary primers are useful as genetics markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brousseau R, Saint-Onge A, Prefontaine G, Masson L and Cabane J (1993) Arbitrary primer polymerase chain reaction, a powerful method to identify Bacillus thuringiensis serovars and strains. Appl Environ Micorbiol 59:114–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen BM, Damgaard PH, Eilenberg J and Pedersen JC (1998) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from leaves and insects. J Invertebr Pathol 71:106–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Travers RS, Martin PA and Reichelderfer CF (1987) Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus sp. Appl Environ Micorbiol 53:1263–1266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohba M and Aizawa K (1986) Insect toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from soils of Japan. J Inverte Pathol 47:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Welsh J and McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 7213–7218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaradoni SN, Krishnaraj PU, Ussuf KK and Kuruvinashetti MS (2003) Molecular characterization of isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis from Western Ghats. J Plant Biol 30:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaviera-Rivera AM and Priest FG (2003) Molecular typing of Bacillus thuringiensis serovars by RAPD-PCR. Syst Appl Micobiol 26:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Malkawi HI, Al-Momani F, Meqdam MM, Saadoun I and Mohammad MJ (1999) Detection of genetic polymorphisms by RAPD-PCR among isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis. New Microbiol 22:241–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pattanayak D, Chakrabarty SK, Kumar PA and Naik PS (2001) Characterization of genetic diversity of some serovars of Bacillus thuringiensis by RAPD. Indian J Exp Biology 39(9) 897–901

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bostock A, Khattak MN, Mathews R and Burnie J (1993) Comparison of PCR fingerprinting, by random amplification of polymorphic DNA with other molecular typing methods for Candida albicans. J General Microbiol 139: 2179–2184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharmender Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, D., Chaudhary, K. & Boora, K.S. Characterization of native Bacillus thuringiensis strains by PCR-RAPD based fingerprinting. Indian J Microbiol 50, 27–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-009-0011-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-009-0011-3

Keywords

Navigation